Left Leaning Models: AI Assumptions on Economic Policy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15771v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 16:27:16 GMT
• Title: Left Leaning Models: AI Assumptions on Economic Policy
• Authors: Maxim Chupilkin,
• Abstract summary: This paper uses a conjoint experiment to tease out the main factors influencing large language models' evaluation of economic policy.<n>It finds that LLMs are most sensitive to unemployment, inequality, financial stability, and environmental harm and less sensitive to traditional macroeconomic concerns such as economic growth, inflation, and government debt.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: How does AI think about economic policy? While the use of large language models (LLMs) in economics is growing exponentially, their assumptions on economic issues remain a black box. This paper uses a conjoint experiment to tease out the main factors influencing LLMs' evaluation of economic policy. It finds that LLMs are most sensitive to unemployment, inequality, financial stability, and environmental harm and less sensitive to traditional macroeconomic concerns such as economic growth, inflation, and government debt. The results are remarkably consistent across scenarios and across models.

Related papers

• Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis [55.328782443604986]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) face frequent knowledge conflicts due to discrepancies between pre-trained parametric knowledge and real-time market data.<n>This paper offers the first quantitative analysis of confirmation bias in LLM-based investment analysis.<n>We observe a consistent preference for large-cap stocks and contrarian strategies across most models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T16:09:38Z)
• Harnessing the Reasoning Economy: A Survey of Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [51.85792055455284]
  Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks.<n>System 1 reasoning is computationally efficient but leads to suboptimal performance.<n>System 2 reasoning often incurs substantial computational costs due to its slow thinking nature and inefficient or unnecessary reasoning behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:58:07Z)
• Large Language Models Reflect the Ideology of their Creators [71.65505524599888]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on vast amounts of data to generate natural language.<n>This paper shows that the ideological stance of an LLM appears to reflect the worldview of its creators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T04:02:30Z)
• GLEE: A Unified Framework and Benchmark for Language-based Economic Environments [19.366120861935105]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show significant potential in economic and strategic interactions.<n>These questions become crucial concerning the economic and societal implications of integrating LLM-based agents into real-world data-driven systems.<n>We introduce a benchmark for standardizing research on two-player, sequential, language-based games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T17:55:35Z)
• LLM economicus? Mapping the Behavioral Biases of LLMs via Utility Theory [20.79199807796242]
  Utility theory is an approach to evaluate the economic biases of large language models. We find that the economic behavior of current LLMs is neither entirely human-like nor entirely economicus-like.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T19:00:43Z)
• EconNLI: Evaluating Large Language Models on Economics Reasoning [22.754757518792395]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used for writing economic analysis reports or providing financial advice. We propose a new dataset, natural language inference on economic events (EconNLI), to evaluate LLMs' knowledge and reasoning abilities in the economic domain. Our experiments reveal that LLMs are not sophisticated in economic reasoning and may generate wrong or hallucinated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T11:58:24Z)
• Learning Macroeconomic Policies through Dynamic Stackelberg Mean-Field Games [14.341143540616441]
  We formulate a dynamic Stackelberg game: the government (leader) sets policies, and agents (followers) respond by optimizing their behavior over time.<n>As the number of agents increases, explicitly simulating all agent-agent and agent-government interactions becomes computationally infeasible.<n>We propose the Dynamic Stackelberg Mean Field Game framework, which approximates these complex interactions via agent-population and government-population couplings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T13:22:31Z)
• Exploring the Jungle of Bias: Political Bias Attribution in Language Models via Dependency Analysis [86.49858739347412]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have sparked intense debate regarding the prevalence of bias in these models and its mitigation. We propose a prompt-based method for the extraction of confounding and mediating attributes which contribute to the decision process. We find that the observed disparate treatment can at least in part be attributed to confounding and mitigating attributes and model misalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T00:02:25Z)
• EconAgent: Large Language Model-Empowered Agents for Simulating Macroeconomic Activities [43.70290385026672]
  We introduce EconAgent, a large language model-empowered agent with human-like characteristics for macroeconomic simulation. We first construct a simulation environment that incorporates various market dynamics driven by agents' decisions. Through the perception module, we create heterogeneous agents with distinct decision-making mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:19:40Z)
• Weak Supervision in Analysis of News: Application to Economic Policy Uncertainty [0.0]
  Our work focuses on studying the potential of textual data, in particular news pieces, for measuring economic policy uncertainty (EPU) Economic policy uncertainty is defined as the public's inability to predict the outcomes of their decisions under new policies and future economic fundamentals. Our work proposes a machine learning based solution involving weak supervision to classify news articles with regards to economic policy uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T09:08:29Z)
• Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy Design using the AI Economist [67.08543240320756]
  We show that the AI Economist framework enables effective, flexible, and interpretable policy design using two-level reinforcement learning and data-driven simulations. We find that log-linear policies trained using RL significantly improve social welfare, based on both public health and economic outcomes, compared to past outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T01:30:41Z)
• The AI Economist: Optimal Economic Policy Design via Two-level Deep Reinforcement Learning [126.37520136341094]
  We show that machine-learning-based economic simulation is a powerful policy and mechanism design framework. The AI Economist is a two-level, deep RL framework that trains both agents and a social planner who co-adapt. In simple one-step economies, the AI Economist recovers the optimal tax policy of economic theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T17:42:35Z)
• The AI Economist: Improving Equality and Productivity with AI-Driven Tax Policies [119.07163415116686]
  We train social planners that discover tax policies that can effectively trade-off economic equality and productivity. We present an economic simulation environment that features competitive pressures and market dynamics. We show that AI-driven tax policies improve the trade-off between equality and productivity by 16% over baseline policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T06:57:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.