Beyond Algorethics: Addressing the Ethical and Anthropological Challenges of AI Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16430v1
• Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:22:08 GMT
• Title: Beyond Algorethics: Addressing the Ethical and Anthropological Challenges of AI Recommender Systems
• Authors: Octavian M. Machidon,
• Abstract summary: I examine the ethical and anthropological challenges posed by AI-driven recommender systems (RSs)<n>I argue that existing ethical approaches, including algorethics, are necessary but ultimately inadequate.<n>I propose a comprehensive framework for human-centered RS design, integrating interdisciplinary perspectives, regulatory strategies, and educational initiatives.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, I examine the ethical and anthropological challenges posed by AI-driven recommender systems (RSs), which have become central to shaping digital environments and social interactions. By curating personalized content, RSs do not merely reflect user preferences but actively construct individual experiences across social media, entertainment platforms, and e-commerce. Despite their ubiquity, the ethical implications of RSs remain insufficiently explored, even as concerns over privacy, autonomy, and mental well-being intensify. I argue that existing ethical approaches, including algorethics, the effort to embed ethical principles into algorithmic design, are necessary but ultimately inadequate. RSs inherently reduce human complexity to quantifiable dimensions, exploit user vulnerabilities, and prioritize engagement over well-being. Addressing these concerns requires moving beyond purely technical solutions. I propose a comprehensive framework for human-centered RS design, integrating interdisciplinary perspectives, regulatory strategies, and educational initiatives to ensure AI systems foster rather than undermine human autonomy and societal flourishing.

Related papers

• On Demographic Transformation: Why We Need to Think Beyond Silos [0.0]
  We examine the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in transforming geriatric care.<n>These technologies offer powerful tools for personalizing treatment, enhancing diagnostics, and enabling remote monitoring.<n>We conclude by advocating for a transdisciplinary framework that unites policymakers, healthcare professionals, engineers, ethicists, and community stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T19:12:01Z)
• Feeling Machines: Ethics, Culture, and the Rise of Emotional AI [18.212492056071657]
  This paper explores the growing presence of emotionally responsive artificial intelligence through a critical and interdisciplinary lens.<n>It explores how AI systems that simulate or interpret human emotions are reshaping our interactions in areas such as education, healthcare, mental health, caregiving, and digital life.<n>The analysis is structured around four central themes: the ethical implications of emotional AI, the cultural dynamics of human-machine interaction, the risks and opportunities for vulnerable populations, and the emerging regulatory, design, and technical considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T10:28:26Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [55.2480439325792]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Addressing Social Misattributions of Large Language Models: An HCXAI-based Approach [45.74830585715129]
  We suggest extending the Social Transparency (ST) framework to address the risks of social misattributions in Large Language Models (LLMs) LLMs may lead to mismatches between designers' intentions and users' perceptions of social attributes, risking to promote emotional manipulation and dangerous behaviors. We propose enhancing the ST framework with a fifth 'W-question' to clarify the specific social attributions assigned to LLMs by its designers and users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T17:02:42Z)
• Evolving AI Collectives to Enhance Human Diversity and Enable Self-Regulation [40.763340315488406]
  Large language model behavior is shaped by the language of those with whom they interact. This capacity and their increasing prevalence online portend that they will intentionally or unintentionally "program" one another. We discuss opportunities for AI cross-moderation and address ethical issues and design challenges associated with creating and maintaining free-formed AI collectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T22:59:43Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Beneficent Intelligence: A Capability Approach to Modeling Benefit, Assistance, and Associated Moral Failures through AI Systems [12.239090962956043]
  The prevailing discourse around AI ethics lacks the language and formalism necessary to capture the diverse ethical concerns that emerge when AI systems interact with individuals. We present a framework formalizing a network of ethical concepts and entitlements necessary for AI systems to confer meaningful benefit or assistance to stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T22:38:14Z)
• Human-AI Coevolution [48.74579595505374]
  Coevolution AI is a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other. This paper introduces Coevolution AI as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T18:10:54Z)
• Ethics in conversation: Building an ethics assurance case for autonomous AI-enabled voice agents in healthcare [1.8964739087256175]
  The principles-based ethics assurance argument pattern is one proposal in the AI ethics landscape. This paper presents the interim findings of a case study applying this ethics assurance framework to the use of Dora, an AI-based telemedicine system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:04:59Z)
• Human Uncertainty in Concept-Based AI Systems [37.82747673914624]
  We study human uncertainty in the context of concept-based AI systems. We show that training with uncertain concept labels may help mitigate weaknesses in concept-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T19:17:57Z)
• Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices [44.67324097900778]
  Many current AI systems were found vulnerable to imperceptible attacks, biased against underrepresented groups, lacking in user privacy protection, etc. In this review, we strive to provide AI practitioners a comprehensive guide towards building trustworthy AI systems. To unify the current fragmented approaches towards trustworthy AI, we propose a systematic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T03:20:39Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Towards an Ethical Framework in the Complex Digital Era [0.0]
  Digital platforms have been used to build a global chaotic and truth-agnostic system. Ethical frameworks based only on the individual level are no longer sufficient. New ethical vision must comprise the understanding of the scales and complex interconnections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T15:28:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.