Each to Their Own: Exploring the Optimal Embedding in RAG

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17442v1
• Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 12:03:54 GMT
• Title: Each to Their Own: Exploring the Optimal Embedding in RAG
• Authors: Shiting Chen, Zijian Zhao, Jinsong Chen,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation is notable for its low cost and minimal effort for parameter tuning.<n>We propose and examine two approaches to enhance RAG by combining the benefits of multiple embedding models.<n>Confident RAG generates responses multiple times using different embedding models and then selects the responses with the highest confidence level.
• Score: 5.61623830061444
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recently, as Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally impacted various fields, the methods for incorporating up-to-date information into LLMs or adding external knowledge to construct domain-specific models have garnered wide attention. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), serving as an inference-time scaling method, is notable for its low cost and minimal effort for parameter tuning. However, due to heterogeneous training data and model architecture, the variant embedding models used in RAG exhibit different benefits across various areas, often leading to different similarity calculation results and, consequently, varying response quality from LLMs. To address this problem, we propose and examine two approaches to enhance RAG by combining the benefits of multiple embedding models, named Mixture-Embedding RAG and Confident RAG. Mixture-Embedding RAG simply sorts and selects retrievals from multiple embedding models based on standardized similarity; however, it does not outperform vanilla RAG. In contrast, Confident RAG generates responses multiple times using different embedding models and then selects the responses with the highest confidence level, demonstrating average improvements of approximately 10% and 5% over vanilla LLMs and RAG, respectively. The consistent results across different LLMs and embedding models indicate that Confident RAG is an efficient plug-and-play approach for various domains. We will release our code upon publication.

Related papers

• RAG in the Wild: On the (In)effectiveness of LLMs with Mixture-of-Knowledge Retrieval Augmentation [45.679455112940175]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge retrieved at inference time.<n>We evaluated RAG systems using MassiveDS, a large-scale datastore with mixture of knowledge, and identified critical limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T20:57:24Z)
• Learning to Route Queries Across Knowledge Bases for Step-wise Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning [60.84901522792042]
  Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) has shown promise in mitigating hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We propose R1, a novel MRAG framework that learns to decide when and where to retrieve knowledge based on the evolving reasoning state.<n>R1- can adaptively and effectively leverage diverse KBs, reducing unnecessary retrievals and improving both efficiency and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T08:17:57Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal Contexts [56.7225771305861]
  This paper introduces Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (M$2$RAG), a benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Multi-modal Large Language Models.<n>The benchmark comprises four tasks: image captioning, multi-modal question answering, multi-modal fact verification, and image reranking.<n>To enhance the context utilization capabilities of MLLMs, we also introduce Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Instruction Tuning (MM-RAIT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T16:25:25Z)
• Improving Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [51.54046200512198]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is extensively utilized to incorporate external, current knowledge into large language models.<n>A standard RAG pipeline may comprise several components, such as query rewriting, document retrieval, document filtering, and answer generation.<n>To overcome these challenges, we propose treating the RAG pipeline as a multi-agent cooperative task, with each component regarded as an RL agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-25T14:24:50Z)
• RAG-DDR: Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Using Differentiable Data Rewards [78.74923079748521]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven its effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving knowledge from external resources.<n>Current approaches use instruction tuning to optimize LLMs, improving their ability to utilize retrieved knowledge.<n>We propose a Differentiable Data Rewards ( DDR) method, which trains RAG systems by aligning data preferences between different RAG modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T12:53:29Z)
• Model-GLUE: Democratized LLM Scaling for A Large Model Zoo in the Wild [84.57103623507082]
  This paper introduces Model-GLUE, a holistic Large Language Models scaling guideline.<n>We benchmark existing scaling techniques, especially selective merging, and variants of mixture.<n>We then formulate an optimal strategy for the selection and aggregation of a heterogeneous model zoo.<n>Our methodology involves the clustering of mergeable models and optimal merging strategy selection, and the integration of clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T15:55:55Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [66.93260816493553]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.<n>With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics: Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.<n> Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [26.158785168036662]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation allows to enhance Large Language Models with external knowledge. Inconsistent benchmarking poses a major challenge in comparing approaches and understanding the impact of each component in the pipeline. In this work, we study best practices that lay the groundwork for a systematic evaluation of RAG and present BERGEN, an end-to-end library for reproducible research standardizing RAG experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T09:09:27Z)
• Fine-Tuning or Fine-Failing? Debunking Performance Myths in Large Language Models [0.8399688944263842]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have the capability to understand and generate human-like text from input queries. This study extends this concept to the integration of LLMs within Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines. We evaluate the impact of fine-tuning on the LLMs' capacity for data extraction and contextual understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T04:35:17Z)
• Multi-Head RAG: Solving Multi-Aspect Problems with LLMs [18.581518952488093]
  Multi-Head RAG (MRAG) is a novel scheme for fetching multi-aspect documents.<n>We show MRAG's design advantages over 18 RAG baselines, empirical improvements of up to 20% in retrieval success ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T16:59:38Z)
• FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Research [70.6584488911715]
  retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has attracted considerable research attention.<n>Existing RAG toolkits are often heavy and inflexibly, failing to meet the customization needs of researchers.<n>Our toolkit has implemented 16 advanced RAG methods and gathered and organized 38 benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T12:12:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.