New source, new possibilities: An exploratory study of Bluesky posts referencing scholarly articles
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18840v1
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:31:28 GMT
- Title: New source, new possibilities: An exploratory study of Bluesky posts referencing scholarly articles
- Authors: Er-Te Zheng, Xiaorui Jiang, Zhichao Fang, Mike Thelwall,
- Abstract summary: This study presents the first large-scale analysis of scholarly article dissemination on Bluesky.<n>We collected and analysed 87,470 Bluesky posts referencing 72,898 scholarly articles from February 2024 to April 2025.<n>A sharp increase in scholarly activity on Bluesky was observed from November 2024, coinciding with broader academic shifts away from X.
- Score: 4.486976696247063
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Amid the migration of academics from X, the social media platform Bluesky has been proposed as a potential alternative. To assess its viability and relevance for science communication, this study presents the first large-scale analysis of scholarly article dissemination on Bluesky, exploring its potential as a new source of social media metrics. We collected and analysed 87,470 Bluesky posts referencing 72,898 scholarly articles from February 2024 to April 2025, integrating metadata from the OpenAlex database. We examined temporal trends, disciplinary coverage, language use, textual characteristics, and user engagement. A sharp increase in scholarly activity on Bluesky was observed from November 2024, coinciding with broader academic shifts away from X. Posts primarily focus on the social, environmental, and medical sciences and are predominantly written in English. As on X, likes and reposts are much more common than replies and quotes. Nevertheless, Bluesky posts demonstrate a higher degree of textual originality than previously observed on X, suggesting greater interpretive engagement. These findings highlight Bluesky's emerging role as a credible platform for science communication and a promising source for altmetrics. The platform may facilitate not only early visibility of research outputs but also more meaningful scholarly dialogue in the evolving social media landscape.
Related papers
- Why Academics Are Leaving Twitter for Bluesky [42.41481706562645]
We show that 18% of scholars in our sample transitioned, with transition rates varying sharply by discipline, political expression, and Twitter engagement but not by traditional academic metrics.<n>We uncover a striking asymmetry whereby information sources drive migration far more powerfully than audience, with this influence decaying exponentially within a week.<n>Our findings provide new insights onto theories of network externalities, directional influence, and platform migration, highlighting information sources' central role in overcoming switching costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T17:03:21Z) - Optimizing Research Portfolio For Semantic Impact [55.2480439325792]
Citation metrics are widely used to assess academic impact but suffer from social biases.<n>We introduce rXiv Semantic Impact (XSI), a novel framework that predicts research impact.<n>XSI tracks the evolution of research concepts in the academic knowledge graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T17:44:13Z) - A Network Analysis Approach to Conlang Research Literature [0.0]
This paper aims to have an overall understanding of the literature on conlang research.
Analysing over 2300 academic publications since 1927 until 2022, we have found that Esperanto is by far the most documented conlang.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T04:40:45Z) - SMP Challenge: An Overview and Analysis of Social Media Prediction Challenge [63.311045291016555]
Social Media Popularity Prediction (SMPP) is a crucial task that involves automatically predicting future popularity values of online posts.
This paper summarizes the challenging task, data, and research progress.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T02:36:14Z) - Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals.
Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z) - A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [55.33653554387953]
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) has led to numerous literature reviews aimed at collecting and fragmented information.<n>This paper presents a thorough analysis of these literature reviews within the PAMI field.<n>We try to address three core research questions: (1) What are the prevalent structural and statistical characteristics of PAMI literature reviews; (2) What strategies can researchers employ to efficiently navigate the growing corpus of reviews; and (3) What are the advantages and limitations of AI-generated reviews compared to human-authored ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z) - Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research.
We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023.
Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z) - Topic Modelling of Swedish Newspaper Articles about Coronavirus: a Case
Study using Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method [8.405827390095064]
Topic Modelling (TM) is from the research branches of natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language processing (NLP)
In this study, we apply popular Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) methods to model the topic changes in Swedish newspaper articles about Coronavirus.
We describe the corpus we created including 6515 articles, methods applied, and statistics on topic changes over approximately 1 year and two months period of time from 17th January 2020 to 13th March 2021.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-08T12:33:58Z) - Exploring Fake News Detection with Heterogeneous Social Media Context
Graphs [4.2177790395417745]
Fake news detection has become a research area that goes way beyond a purely academic interest as it has direct implications on our society as a whole.
We propose to construct heterogeneous social context graphs around news articles and reformulate the problem as a graph classification task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T13:29:47Z) - Change Summarization of Diachronic Scholarly Paper Collections by
Semantic Evolution Analysis [10.554831859741851]
We demonstrate a novel approach to analyze the collections of research papers published over longer time periods.
Our approach is based on comparing word semantic representations over time and aims to support users in a better understanding of large domain-focused archives of scholarly publications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-07T11:15:19Z) - Surveying the Research on Fake News in Social Media: a Tale of Networks
and Language [0.0]
The history of journalism and news diffusion is tightly coupled with the effort to dispel hoaxes, misinformation, propaganda, unverified rumours, poor reporting, and messages containing hate and divisions.
With the explosive growth of online social media and billions of individuals engaged with consuming, creating, and sharing news, this ancient problem has surfaced with a renewed intensity.
This has triggered many researchers to develop new methods for studying, understanding, detecting, and preventing fake-news diffusion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-13T14:10:44Z) - Semantic Analysis for Automated Evaluation of the Potential Impact of
Research Articles [62.997667081978825]
This paper presents a novel method for vector representation of text meaning based on information theory.
We show how this informational semantics is used for text classification on the basis of the Leicester Scientific Corpus.
We show that an informational approach to representing the meaning of a text has offered a way to effectively predict the scientific impact of research papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-26T20:37:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.