Bias Analysis for Synthetic Face Detection: A Case Study of the Impact of Facial Attributes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19705v2
• Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 13:45:39 GMT
• Title: Bias Analysis for Synthetic Face Detection: A Case Study of the Impact of Facial Attributes
• Authors: Asmae Lamsaf, Lucia Cascone, Hugo Proença, João Neves,
• Abstract summary: We introduce an evaluation framework to contribute to the analysis of bias of synthetic face detectors with respect to several facial attributes.<n>We build on the proposed framework to provide an extensive case study of the bias level of five state-of-the-art detectors in synthetic datasets with 25 controlled facial attributes.
• Score: 14.594459540658429
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bias analysis for synthetic face detection is bound to become a critical topic in the coming years. Although many detection models have been developed and several datasets have been released to reliably identify synthetic content, one crucial aspect has been largely overlooked: these models and training datasets can be biased, leading to failures in detection for certain demographic groups and raising significant social, legal, and ethical issues. In this work, we introduce an evaluation framework to contribute to the analysis of bias of synthetic face detectors with respect to several facial attributes. This framework exploits synthetic data generation, with evenly distributed attribute labels, for mitigating any skew in the data that could otherwise influence the outcomes of bias analysis. We build on the proposed framework to provide an extensive case study of the bias level of five state-of-the-art detectors in synthetic datasets with 25 controlled facial attributes. While the results confirm that, in general, synthetic face detectors are biased towards the presence/absence of specific facial attributes, our study also sheds light on the origins of the observed bias through the analysis of the correlations with the balancing of facial attributes in the training sets of the detectors, and the analysis of detectors activation maps in image pairs with controlled attribute modifications.

Related papers

• Trust Your Gut: Comparing Human and Machine Inference from Noisy Visualizations [7.305342793164905]
  We investigate scenarios where human intuition might surpass idealized statistical rationality. Our findings suggest that analyst gut reactions to visualizations may provide an advantage, even when departing from rationality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T22:39:57Z)
• Thinking Racial Bias in Fair Forgery Detection: Models, Datasets and Evaluations [63.52709761339949]
  We first contribute a dedicated dataset called the Fair Forgery Detection (FairFD) dataset, where we prove the racial bias of public state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods.<n>We design novel metrics including Approach Averaged Metric and Utility Regularized Metric, which can avoid deceptive results.<n>We also present an effective and robust post-processing technique, Bias Pruning with Fair Activations (BPFA), which improves fairness without requiring retraining or weight updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T14:53:18Z)
• Bias and Diversity in Synthetic-based Face Recognition [12.408456748469426]
  We investigate how the diversity of synthetic face recognition datasets compares to authentic datasets. We look at the distribution of gender, ethnicity, age, and head position. With regard to bias, it can be seen that the synthetic-based models share a similar bias behavior with the authentic-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T13:12:34Z)
• Benchmarking Algorithmic Bias in Face Recognition: An Experimental Approach Using Synthetic Faces and Human Evaluation [24.35436087740559]
  We propose an experimental method for measuring bias in face recognition systems. Our method is based on generating synthetic faces using a neural face generator. We validate our method quantitatively by evaluating race and gender biases of three research-grade face recognition models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-10T08:57:31Z)
• Robustness Disparities in Face Detection [64.71318433419636]
  We present the first of its kind detailed benchmark of face detection systems, specifically examining the robustness to noise of commercial and academic models. Across all the datasets and systems, we generally find that photos of individuals who are $textitmasculine presenting$, of $textitolder$, of $textitdarker skin type$, or have $textitdim lighting$ are more susceptible to errors than their counterparts in other identities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T05:22:47Z)
• Are Face Detection Models Biased? [69.68854430664399]
  We investigate possible bias in the domain of face detection through facial region localization. Most existing face detection datasets lack suitable annotation for such analysis. We observe a high disparity in detection accuracies across gender and skin-tone, and interplay of confounding factors beyond demography.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T14:27:55Z)
• Investigating Bias with a Synthetic Data Generator: Empirical Evidence and Philosophical Interpretation [66.64736150040093]
  Machine learning applications are becoming increasingly pervasive in our society. Risk is that they will systematically spread the bias embedded in data. We propose to analyze biases by introducing a framework for generating synthetic data with specific types of bias and their combinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-13T11:18:50Z)
• CIAO! A Contrastive Adaptation Mechanism for Non-Universal Facial Expression Recognition [80.07590100872548]
  We propose Contrastive Inhibitory Adaptati On (CIAO), a mechanism that adapts the last layer of facial encoders to depict specific affective characteristics on different datasets. CIAO presents an improvement in facial expression recognition performance over six different datasets with very unique affective representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T15:46:05Z)
• Mitigating Bias in Facial Analysis Systems by Incorporating Label Diversity [4.089080285684415]
  We introduce a novel learning method that combines subjective human-based labels and objective annotations based on mathematical definitions of facial traits. Our method successfully mitigates unintended biases, while maintaining significant accuracy on the downstream task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T13:17:27Z)
• Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysis [86.79402670904338]
  Existing facial analysis systems have been shown to yield biased results against certain demographic subgroups. It has become imperative to ensure that these systems do not discriminate based on gender, identity, or skin tone of individuals. This has led to research in the identification and mitigation of bias in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T09:51:13Z)
• Using Synthetic Images To Uncover Population Biases In Facial Landmarks Detection [0.8594140167290096]
  We show that synthetic test sets can efficiently detect a model's weak spots and overcome limitations of real test set in terms of quantity and/or diversity. This shows that synthetic test sets can efficiently detect a model's weak spots and overcome limitations of real test set in terms of quantity and/or diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T15:42:15Z)
• SynFace: Face Recognition with Synthetic Data [83.15838126703719]
  We devise the SynFace with identity mixup (IM) and domain mixup (DM) to mitigate the performance gap. We also perform a systematically empirical analysis on synthetic face images to provide some insights on how to effectively utilize synthetic data for face recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-18T03:41:54Z)
• Unravelling the Effect of Image Distortions for Biased Prediction of Pre-trained Face Recognition Models [86.79402670904338]
  We evaluate the performance of four state-of-the-art deep face recognition models in the presence of image distortions. We have observed that image distortions have a relationship with the performance gap of the model across different subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-14T16:49:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.