LLM-Based Identification of Infostealer Infection Vectors from Screenshots: The Case of Aurora

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23611v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 14:49:03 GMT
• Title: LLM-Based Identification of Infostealer Infection Vectors from Screenshots: The Case of Aurora
• Abstract summary: Infostealers exfiltrate credentials, session cookies, and sensitive data from infected systems.<n>With over 29 million stealer logs reported in 2024, manual analysis and mitigation at scale are virtually unfeasible/unpractical.<n>This paper introduces a novel approach leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze infection screenshots.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Infostealers exfiltrate credentials, session cookies, and sensitive data from infected systems. With over 29 million stealer logs reported in 2024, manual analysis and mitigation at scale are virtually unfeasible/unpractical. While most research focuses on proactive malware detection, a significant gap remains in leveraging reactive analysis of stealer logs and their associated artifacts. Specifically, infection artifacts such as screenshots, image captured at the point of compromise, are largely overlooked by the current literature. This paper introduces a novel approach leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs), more specifically gpt-4o-mini, to analyze infection screenshots to extract potential Indicators of Compromise (IoCs), map infection vectors, and track campaigns. Focusing on the Aurora infostealer, we demonstrate how LLMs can process screenshots to identify infection vectors, such as malicious URLs, installer files, and exploited software themes. Our method extracted 337 actionable URLs and 246 relevant files from 1000 screenshots, revealing key malware distribution methods and social engineering tactics. By correlating extracted filenames, URLs, and infection themes, we identified three distinct malware campaigns, demonstrating the potential of LLM-driven analysis for uncovering infection workflows and enhancing threat intelligence. By shifting malware analysis from traditional log-based detection methods to a reactive, artifact-driven approach that leverages infection screenshots, this research presents a scalable method for identifying infection vectors and enabling early intervention.

Related papers

• A Large Language Model Approach to Generating Bypass Rules for Malware Evasion in Analysis Sandbox [0.0]
  Existing approaches rely on manually crafted bypass rules that require deep reverse engineering of each evasion mechanism.<n>We propose ABLE, which analyzes execution traces from malware terminated due to potentially evasive behavior.<n>ABLE achieves a 79% bypass success rate, with iterative refinement contributing 29.5% of successful cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T23:43:02Z)
• EntropyScan: Towards Model-level Backdoor Detection in LVLMs via Visual Attention Entropy [66.59724477993339]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks, yet they remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks.<n>We propose EntropyScan, a lightweight and trigger-agnostic method for model-level backdoor detection in LVLMs.<n>Our code will be publicly available soon.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T08:01:32Z)
• Silent Egress: When Implicit Prompt Injection Makes LLM Agents Leak Without a Trace [0.0]
  We show that adversarial instructions embedded in automatically generated URL previews can introduce a system-level risk that we refer to as silent egress.<n>Using a fully local and reproducible testbed, we demonstrate that a malicious web page can induce an agent to issue outbound requests that exfiltrate sensitive runtime context.<n>In 480 experimental runs with a qwen2.5:7b-based agent, the attack succeeds with high probability (P (egress) =0.89), and 95% of successful attacks are not detected by output-based safety checks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T22:26:23Z)
• The Silent Spill: Measuring Sensitive Data Leaks Across Public URL Repositories [3.557034943202842]
  We present an automated system that detects and analyzes potential sensitive information leaked through publicly accessible URLs.<n>We apply it to 6,094,475 URLs collected from public scanning platforms, paste sites, and web archives.<n>These findings show that sensitive information remains exposed, underscoring the importance of automated detection to identify accidental leaks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T11:54:46Z)
• The Trojan Knowledge: Bypassing Commercial LLM Guardrails via Harmless Prompt Weaving and Adaptive Tree Search [58.8834056209347]
  Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety guardrails to elicit harmful outputs.<n>We introduce the Correlated Knowledge Attack Agent (CKA-Agent), a dynamic framework that reframes jailbreaking as an adaptive, tree-structured exploration of the target model's knowledge base.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T07:05:23Z)
• BackdoorVLM: A Benchmark for Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language Models [63.5775877701015]
  We introduce textbfBackdoorVLM, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating backdoor attacks on vision-language models (VLMs)<n>BackdoorVLM organizes multimodal backdoor threats into 5 representative categories: targeted refusal, malicious injection, jailbreak, concept substitution, and perceptual hijack.<n>We evaluate these threats using 12 representative attack methods spanning text, image, and bimodal triggers, tested on 2 open-source VLMs and 3 multimodal datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T09:30:38Z)
• Paper Summary Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs through LLM Safety Papers [61.57691030102618]
  We propose a novel jailbreaking method, Paper Summary Attack (llmnamePSA)<n>It synthesizes content from either attack-focused or defense-focused LLM safety paper to construct an adversarial prompt template.<n>Experiments show significant vulnerabilities not only in base LLMs, but also in state-of-the-art reasoning model like Deepseek-R1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T18:33:50Z)
• Semantic Preprocessing for LLM-based Malware Analysis [0.0]
  We propose a new preprocessing method which creates reports for Portable Executable files.<n>The purpose of this preprocessing is to gather a semantic representation of binary files, understandable by malware analysts.<n>Using this preprocessing to train a Large Language Model for Malware classification, we achieve a weighted-average F1-score of 0.94 on a complex dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T13:39:00Z)
• Enhanced Consistency Bi-directional GAN(CBiGAN) for Malware Anomaly Detection [0.25163931116642785]
  This paper introduces the application of the CBiGAN in the domain of malware anomaly detection.<n>We utilize several datasets including both portable executable (PE) files as well as Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) files.<n>We then evaluated our model against a diverse set of both PE and OLE files, including self-collected malicious executables from 214 malware families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T02:43:25Z)
• Document Screenshot Retrievers are Vulnerable to Pixel Poisoning Attacks [72.4498910775871]
  Vision-language model (VLM)-based retrievers leverage document screenshots embedded as vectors to enable effective search and offer a simplified pipeline over traditional text-only methods.<n>In this study, we propose three pixel poisoning attack methods designed to compromise VLM-based retrievers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T12:40:37Z)
• Unveiling Malware Patterns: A Self-analysis Perspective [15.517313565392852]
  VisUnpack is a static analysis-based data visualization framework for bolstering attack prevention and aiding recovery post-attack.<n>Our method includes unpacking packed malware programs, calculating local similarity descriptors based on basic blocks, enhancing correlations between descriptors, and refining them by minimizing noises.<n>Our comprehensive evaluation of VisUnpack based on a freshly gathered dataset with over 27,106 samples confirms its capability in accurately classifying malware programs with a precision of 99.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T16:04:13Z)
• Living off the Analyst: Harvesting Features from Yara Rules for Malware Detection [50.55317257140427]
  A strategy used by malicious actors is to "live off the land," where benign systems are used and repurposed for the malicious actor's intent.<n>We show that this is plausible via YARA rules, which use human-written signatures to detect specific malware families.<n>By extracting sub-signatures from publicly available YARA rules, we assembled a set of features that can more effectively discriminate malicious samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T17:03:00Z)
• Burning the Adversarial Bridges: Robust Windows Malware Detection Against Binary-level Mutations [16.267773730329207]
  We conduct root-cause analyses of the practical binary-level black-box adversarial malware examples. We highlight volatile information channels within the software and introduce three software pre-processing steps to eliminate the attack surface. To counter the emerging section injection attacks, we propose a graph-based section-dependent information extraction scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T03:28:02Z)
• DRSM: De-Randomized Smoothing on Malware Classifier Providing Certified Robustness [58.23214712926585]
  We develop a certified defense, DRSM (De-Randomized Smoothed MalConv), by redesigning the de-randomized smoothing technique for the domain of malware detection. Specifically, we propose a window ablation scheme to provably limit the impact of adversarial bytes while maximally preserving local structures of the executables. We are the first to offer certified robustness in the realm of static detection of malware executables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T17:25:22Z)
• Mate! Are You Really Aware? An Explainability-Guided Testing Framework for Robustness of Malware Detectors [49.34155921877441]
  We propose an explainability-guided and model-agnostic testing framework for robustness of malware detectors. We then use this framework to test several state-of-the-art malware detectors' abilities to detect manipulated malware. Our findings shed light on the limitations of current malware detectors, as well as how they can be improved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T08:02:38Z)
• Towards an Automated Pipeline for Detecting and Classifying Malware through Machine Learning [0.0]
  We propose a malware taxonomic classification pipeline able to classify Windows Portable Executable files (PEs) Given an input PE sample, it is first classified as either malicious or benign. If malicious, the pipeline further analyzes it in order to establish its threat type, family, and behavior(s)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T10:07:50Z)
• Being Single Has Benefits. Instance Poisoning to Deceive Malware Classifiers [47.828297621738265]
  We show how an attacker can launch a sophisticated and efficient poisoning attack targeting the dataset used to train a malware classifier. As opposed to other poisoning attacks in the malware detection domain, our attack does not focus on malware families but rather on specific malware instances that contain an implanted trigger. We propose a comprehensive detection approach that could serve as a future sophisticated defense against this newly discovered severe threat.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T15:27:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.