CoT-Self-Instruct: Building high-quality synthetic prompts for reasoning and non-reasoning tasks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23751v2
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 14:36:00 GMT
- Title: CoT-Self-Instruct: Building high-quality synthetic prompts for reasoning and non-reasoning tasks
- Authors: Ping Yu, Jack Lanchantin, Tianlu Wang, Weizhe Yuan, Olga Golovneva, Ilia Kulikov, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, Jing Xu,
- Abstract summary: CoT-Self-Instruct is a synthetic data generation method that instructs LLMs to first reason and plan via Chain-of-Thought.<n>In verifiable reasoning, our synthetic data significantly outperforms existing training datasets.<n>For non-verifiable instruction-following tasks, our method surpasses the performance of both human and standard Self-Instruct training data.
- Score: 59.69339605157168
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We propose CoT-Self-Instruct, a synthetic data generation method that instructs LLMs to first reason and plan via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) based on given seed tasks, and then generate a new synthetic example of similar quality and complexity. This is followed by a filtering step to select high-quality data using automatic metrics, which are then used for LLM training. In verifiable reasoning, our synthetic data significantly outperforms existing training datasets, such as s1k and OpenMathReasoning, when evaluated on MATH500, AMC23, AIME24, and GPQA-Diamond. For non-verifiable instruction-following tasks, our method surpasses the performance of both human and standard Self-Instruct training data on the AlpacaEval 2.0 and Arena-Hard benchmarks.
Related papers
- InfoSynth: Information-Guided Benchmark Synthesis for LLMs [69.80981631587501]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant advancements in reasoning and code generation.<n>Traditional benchmark creation relies on manual human effort, a process that is both expensive and time-consuming.<n>This work introduces Info Synth, a novel framework for automatically generating and evaluating reasoning benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-02T05:26:27Z) - UnitCoder: Scalable Iterative Code Synthesis with Unit Test Guidance [65.01483640267885]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various tasks, yet code generation remains a major challenge.<n>We introduce UnitCoder, a systematic pipeline leveraging model-generated unit tests to guide and validate the code generation process.<n>Our work presents a scalable approach that leverages model-generated unit tests to guide the synthesis of high-quality code data from pre-training corpora.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T05:37:02Z) - Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets.
The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method.
The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z) - Synthesizing Post-Training Data for LLMs through Multi-Agent Simulation [51.20656279478878]
MATRIX is a multi-agent simulator that automatically generates diverse text-based scenarios.<n>We introduce MATRIX-Gen for controllable and highly realistic data synthesis.<n>On AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard benchmarks, Llama-3-8B-Base, post-trained on datasets synthesized by MATRIX-Gen with just 20K instruction-response pairs, outperforms Meta's Llama-3-8B-Instruct model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T08:01:39Z) - Optimizing Instruction Synthesis: Effective Exploration of Evolutionary Space with Tree Search [25.108044778194536]
We introduce IDEA-MCTS (Instruction Data Enhancement using Monte Carlo Tree Search), a scalable framework for efficiently synthesizing instructions.
With tree search and evaluation models, it can efficiently guide each instruction to evolve into a high-quality form, aiding in instruction fine-tuning.
Experimental results show that IDEA-MCTS significantly enhances the seed instruction data, raising the average evaluation scores of quality, diversity, and complexity from 2.19 to 3.81.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T11:28:30Z) - Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark [3.2968976262860408]
We investigate the effectiveness of generating synthetic data through large language models (LLMs)
Our experiments show that while synthetic data can effectively capture performance of various methods for simpler tasks, it falls short for more complex tasks like named entity recognition.
We propose a new metric called the bias factor, which evaluates the biases introduced when the same LLM is used to both generate benchmarking data and to perform the tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T13:20:23Z) - Genetic Instruct: Scaling up Synthetic Generation of Coding Instructions for Large Language Models [59.60208063956459]
Large Language Models (LLMs) require high quality instruction data for effective alignment.<n>We present Genetic-Instruct, a scalable algorithm for synthesizing large-scale, high quality coding instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T20:42:59Z) - CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data [51.59223474427153]
We introduce CodecLM, a framework for adaptively generating high-quality synthetic data for instruction-following abilities.
We first encode seed instructions into metadata, which are concise keywords generated on-the-fly to capture the target instruction distribution.
We also introduce Self-Rubrics and Contrastive Filtering during decoding to tailor data-efficient samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-08T21:15:36Z) - RECOST: External Knowledge Guided Data-efficient Instruction Tuning [25.985023475991625]
We argue that most current data-efficient instruction-tuning methods are highly dependent on the quality of the original instruction-tuning dataset.
We propose a framework dubbed as textbfRECOST, which integrates external-knowledge-base re-ranking and diversity-consistent sampling into a single pipeline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T09:47:36Z) - Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Models [59.930513259982725]
We introduce a novel and simple method for obtaining high-quality text embeddings using only synthetic data and less than 1k training steps.
We leverage proprietary LLMs to generate diverse synthetic data for hundreds of thousands of text embedding tasks across 93 languages.
Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves strong performance on highly competitive text embedding benchmarks without using any labeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-31T02:13:18Z) - From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets.
Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z) - Reinforcement Learning and Data-Generation for Syntax-Guided Synthesis [0.0]
We present a reinforcement-learning algorithm for SyGuS which uses Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to search the space of candidate solutions.
Our algorithm learns policy and value functions which, combined with the upper confidence bound for trees, allow it to balance exploration and exploitation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T11:30:50Z) - Exploiting Asymmetry for Synthetic Training Data Generation: SynthIE and
the Case of Information Extraction [28.51694365908817]
This work shows that useful data can be synthetically generated even for tasks that cannot be solved directly by large language models.
We synthetically generate a dataset of 1.8M data points, establish its superior quality compared to existing datasets in a human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-07T18:48:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.