GrandJury: A Collaborative Machine Learning Model Evaluation Protocol for Dynamic Quality Rubrics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02926v2
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 19:57:38 GMT
• Title: GrandJury: A Collaborative Machine Learning Model Evaluation Protocol for Dynamic Quality Rubrics
• Abstract summary: Generative Machine Learning models have become central to modern systems, powering applications in creative writing, summarization, multi-hop reasoning, and context-aware dialogue.<n>Standard evaluation regimes still rely on static, benchmark-style tests, incentivizing optimization toward leaderboard scores rather than alignment with dynamic user needs or evolving realities.<n>GrandJury introduces a formal evaluation protocol combining time-decayed aggregation, complete traceability, with the support of dynamic, transparent task attribution, and human judgment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative Machine Learning models have become central to modern systems, powering applications in creative writing, summarization, multi-hop reasoning, and context-aware dialogue. These models underpin large-scale AI assistants, workflow automation, and autonomous decision-making. In such domains, acceptable response is rarely absolute or static, but plural and highly context-dependent. Yet standard evaluation regimes still rely on static, benchmark-style tests, incentivizing optimization toward leaderboard scores rather than alignment with dynamic user needs or evolving realities. GrandJury introduces a formal evaluation protocol combining time-decayed aggregation, complete traceability, with the support of dynamic, transparent task rubric attribution, and multi-rater human judgment. Together, these elements enable pluralistic, accountable evaluation that captures evolving consensus and surfaces disagreement. We provide an open-source implementation (grandjury PyPI package) and a public collection of Large Language Model (LLM) inference outputs to illustrate the need and method. GrandJury provides a new paradigm for AI practitioners when evaluating machine learning outputs without absolute ground truth.

Related papers

• Test-Time Learning with an Evolving Library [76.87197412229318]
  EvoLib is a test-time learning framework that enables large language models to accumulate, reuse, and evolve knowledge.<n>Instead of adapting model parameters, our approach maintains a shared library of knowledge abstractions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T07:18:12Z)
• UniDial-EvalKit: A Unified Toolkit for Evaluating Multi-Faceted Conversational Abilities [70.79422099851506]
  We present UniDial-EvalKit (UDE), a unified evaluation toolkit for assessing interactive AI systems.<n>UDE standardizes heterogeneous data formats into a universal schema, streamlines complex evaluation pipelines through a modular architecture, and aligns metric calculations under a consistent scoring interface.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T13:01:31Z)
• When Models Judge Themselves: Unsupervised Self-Evolution for Multimodal Reasoning [30.162034423611292]
  We propose an unsupervised self-evolution training framework for multimodal reasoning.<n>It achieves stable performance improvements without using human-annotated answers or external reward models.<n>Our method consistently improves reasoning performance and generalization on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T15:22:19Z)
• MPCEval: A Benchmark for Multi-Party Conversation Generation [23.227067535888768]
  We introduce MPCEval, a task-aware evaluation and benchmarking suite for multi-party conversation generation.<n>MPCEval decomposes generation quality into speaker modeling, content quality, and speaker--content consistency.<n>We apply MPCEval to diverse public and real-world datasets and evaluate modern generation methods alongside human-authored conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T09:07:00Z)
• Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Models for Multi-Requirement Software Engineering Tasks [15.072898489107887]
  We build on DevAI, a benchmark of 55 programming tasks, by adding ground-truth solutions and evaluating the relevance and utility of interviewer hints.<n>Our results highlight the importance of dynamic evaluation in advancing the development of collaborative code-generating agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T10:22:37Z)
• Test-Time Scaling Strategies for Generative Retrieval in Multimodal Conversational Recommendations [70.94563079082751]
  E-commerce has exposed the limitations of traditional product retrieval systems in managing complex, multi-turn user interactions.<n>We propose a novel framework that introduces test-time scaling into conversational multimodal product retrieval.<n>Our approach builds on a generative retriever, further augmented with a test-time reranking mechanism that improves retrieval accuracy and better aligns results with evolving user intent throughout the dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T15:38:56Z)
• Adapting Vision-Language Models for Evaluating World Models [24.813041196394582]
  We present UNIVERSE, a method for adapting Vision-language Evaluator for Rollouts in Simulated Environments under data and compute constraints.<n>We conduct a large-scale study comparing full, partial, and parameter-efficient finetuning across task formats, context lengths, sampling strategies, and data compositions.<n>The resulting unified evaluator matches the performance of task-specific baselines using a single checkpoint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T09:53:28Z)
• Continual Learning for Generative AI: From LLMs to MLLMs and Beyond [56.29231194002407]
  We present a comprehensive survey of continual learning methods for mainstream generative AI models.<n>We categorize these approaches into three paradigms: architecture-based, regularization-based, and replay-based.<n>We analyze continual learning setups for different generative models, including training objectives, benchmarks, and core backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T02:27:25Z)
• Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey [45.485318955120924]
  The transition from traditional large language models (LLMs) to more advanced AI agents represents a pivotal evolutionary step.<n>Existing evaluation frameworks often blur the distinctions between LLM chatbots and AI agents, leading to confusion among researchers selecting appropriate benchmarks.<n>This paper introduces a systematic analysis of current evaluation approaches, grounded in an evolutionary perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T17:52:18Z)
• MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering [57.156093929365255]
  Gym-style framework for systematically reinforcement learning, evaluating, and improving autonomous large language model (LLM) agents.<n>MLE-Dojo covers diverse, open-ended MLE tasks carefully curated to reflect realistic engineering scenarios.<n>Its fully executable environment supports comprehensive agent training via both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T17:35:43Z)
• Generalising from Self-Produced Data: Model Training Beyond Human Constraints [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework in which AI models autonomously generate and validate new knowledge.<n>Central to this approach is an unbounded, ungamable numeric reward that guides learning without requiring human benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:48:02Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignment [84.09815387884753]
  We propose a generative judge with 13B parameters, Auto-J, designed to address these challenges. Our model is trained on user queries and LLM-generated responses under massive real-world scenarios. Experimentally, Auto-J outperforms a series of strong competitors, including both open-source and closed-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T07:27:15Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
• Towards Automatic Evaluation of Dialog Systems: A Model-Free Off-Policy Evaluation Approach [84.02388020258141]
  We propose a new framework named ENIGMA for estimating human evaluation scores based on off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. ENIGMA only requires a handful of pre-collected experience data, and therefore does not involve human interaction with the target policy during the evaluation. Our experiments show that ENIGMA significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of correlation with human evaluation scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T03:29:20Z)
• RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust Task-oriented Dialog Systems [75.87418236410296]
  We introduce the RADDLE benchmark, a collection of corpora and tools for evaluating the performance of models across a diverse set of domains. RADDLE is designed to favor and encourage models with a strong generalization ability. We evaluate recent state-of-the-art systems based on pre-training and fine-tuning, and find that grounded pre-training on heterogeneous dialog corpora performs better than training a separate model per domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-29T08:58:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.