Characterizing noisy quantum computation with imperfectly addressed errors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03261v1
• Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 09:37:26 GMT
• Title: Characterizing noisy quantum computation with imperfectly addressed errors
• Authors: Riddhi S. Gupta, Salini Karuvade, Kerstin Beer, Laura J. Henderson, Sally Shrapnel,
• Abstract summary: Quantum protocols on hardware are subject to noise that prohibits performance.<n>We study the eigen- and singular spectral distributions over an ensemble of random superoperators.<n>We find that distributions of singular spectra depend on how noise violates critical assumptions of these protocols.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Quantum protocols on hardware are subject to noise that prohibits performance. Protocols for addressing errors, such as error correction or error mitigation, may fail to combat errors in quantum computation if noise violates critical assumptions required for these protocols to be effective. However, tools for characterizing such failures in realistic operating conditions are limited. For example, while brute force simulations may be used to characterize the impact of such failures on a handful of input states, such simulations lack a complete description for how noise transforms state-spaces in the full quantum Hilbert space. In this work, we associate quantum computation subject to realistic noise to an ensemble of random superoperators and study the eigen- and singular spectral distributions over this ensemble. We propose a new theoretical framework to characterize singular values of random complex matrices using matrix Chernoff concentration. Using our framework, we analyze imperfectly addressed errors in error mitigation and error correction. We find that distributions of singular spectra depend on how noise violates critical assumptions of these protocols. Finally, we quantitatively discuss how our work may be applied to understanding limiting behavior of quantum computation, such as establishing spectral gaps and relaxation times for specific families of quantum Markov processes. Our work paves the way for new tools to diagnose when to trust the output of noisy quantum computers.

Related papers

• Unconditionally decoherence-free quantum error mitigation by density matrix vectorization [4.2630430280861376]
  We give a new paradigm of quantum error mitigation based on the vectorization of density matrices. Our proposal directly changes the way of encoding information and maps the density matrices of noisy quantum states to noiseless pure states. Our protocol requires no knowledge of the noise model, no ability to tune the noise strength, and no ancilla qubits for complicated controlled unitaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T09:55:05Z)
• Power Characterization of Noisy Quantum Kernels [52.47151453259434]
  We show that noise may make quantum kernel methods to only have poor prediction capability, even when the generalization error is small. We provide a crucial warning to employ noisy quantum kernel methods for quantum computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T01:02:16Z)
• Correcting for finite statistics effects in a quantum steering experiment [33.013102271622614]
  We introduce a one-sided device-independent protocol that corrects for apparent signaling effects in experimental probability distributions.<n>Our results show a significantly higher probability of violation than existing state-of-the-art inequalities.<n>This work demonstrates the power of semidefinite programming for entanglement verification and brings quantum networks closer to practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T14:39:08Z)
• Quantum Conformal Prediction for Reliable Uncertainty Quantification in Quantum Machine Learning [47.991114317813555]
  Quantum models implement implicit probabilistic predictors that produce multiple random decisions for each input through measurement shots. This paper proposes to leverage such randomness to define prediction sets for both classification and regression that provably capture the uncertainty of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T22:05:21Z)
• Leveraging hardware-control imperfections for error mitigation via generalized quantum subspace [0.8399688944263843]
  In the era of quantum computing without full fault-tolerance, it is essential to suppress noise effects via the quantum error mitigation techniques to enhance the computational power of the quantum devices. One of the most effective noise-agnostic error mitigation schemes is the generalized quantum subspace expansion (GSE) method. We propose the fault-subspace method, which constructs an error-mitigated quantum state with copies of quantum states with different noise levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T07:01:30Z)
• Learning logical Pauli noise in quantum error correction [0.7264378254137809]
  We focus on the characterization of quantum computers in the context of stabilizer quantum error correction. For arbitrary stabilizer codes, subsystem codes, and data syndrome codes, we prove that the logical error channel induced by Pauli noise can be estimated from syndrome data under minimal conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T18:00:06Z)
• Noisy Quantum Kernel Machines [58.09028887465797]
  An emerging class of quantum learning machines is that based on the paradigm of quantum kernels. We study how dissipation and decoherence affect their performance. We show that decoherence and dissipation can be seen as an implicit regularization for the quantum kernel machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:52:02Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Characterizing quantum instruments: from non-demolition measurements to quantum error correction [48.43720700248091]
  In quantum information processing quantum operations are often processed alongside measurements which result in classical data. Non-unitary dynamical processes can take place on the system, for which common quantum channel descriptions fail to describe the time evolution. Quantum measurements are correctly treated by means of so-called quantum instruments capturing both classical outputs and post-measurement quantum states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T18:00:13Z)
• Experimental violations of Leggett-Garg's inequalities on a quantum computer [77.34726150561087]
  We experimentally observe the violations of Leggett-Garg-Bell's inequalities on single and multi-qubit systems. Our analysis highlights the limits of nowadays quantum platforms, showing that the above-mentioned correlation functions deviate from theoretical prediction as the number of qubits and the depth of the circuit grow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:35:15Z)
• Achieving fault tolerance against amplitude-damping noise [1.7289359743609742]
  We develop a protocol for fault-tolerant encoded quantum computing components in the presence of amplitude-damping noise. We describe a universal set of fault-tolerant encoded gadgets and compute the pseudothreshold for the noise. Our work demonstrates the possibility of applying the ideas of quantum fault tolerance to targeted noise models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:59:54Z)
• Impact of correlations and heavy-tails on quantum error correction [0.0]
  We show that space- and time-correlated single-qubit rotation errors can lead to high-weight errors in a quantum circuit when the rotation angles are drawn from heavy-tailed distributions. This leads to a breakdown of quantum error correction, yielding reduced or in some cases no protection of the encoded logical qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T19:00:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.