Multi-Objective Infeasibility Diagnosis for Routing Problems Using Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03406v1
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 12:53:20 GMT
- Title: Multi-Objective Infeasibility Diagnosis for Routing Problems Using Large Language Models
- Authors: Kai Li, Ruihao Zheng, Xinye Hao, Zhenkun Wang,
- Abstract summary: In real-world routing problems, users propose conflicting or unreasonable requirements, leading to an empty feasible solution set.<n>Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods attempt to diagnose infeasible models.<n>We introduce Multi-Objective Infeasibility Diagnosis (MOID), which combines LLM agents and multi-objective optimization within an automatic routing solver.
- Score: 8.538624566791189
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In real-world routing problems, users often propose conflicting or unreasonable requirements, which result in infeasible optimization models due to overly restrictive or contradictory constraints, leading to an empty feasible solution set. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods attempt to diagnose infeasible models, but modifying such models often involves multiple potential adjustments that these methods do not consider. To fill this gap, we introduce Multi-Objective Infeasibility Diagnosis (MOID), which combines LLM agents and multi-objective optimization within an automatic routing solver, to provide a set of representative actionable suggestions. Specifically, MOID employs multi-objective optimization to consider both path cost and constraint violation, generating a set of trade-off solutions, each encompassing varying degrees of model adjustments. To extract practical insights from these solutions, MOID utilizes LLM agents to generate a solution analysis function for the infeasible model. This function analyzes these distinct solutions to diagnose the original infeasible model, providing users with diverse diagnostic insights and suggestions. Finally, we compare MOID with several LLM-based methods on 50 types of infeasible routing problems. The results indicate that MOID automatically generates multiple diagnostic suggestions in a single run, providing more practical insights for restoring model feasibility and decision-making compared to existing methods.
Related papers
- Benchmarking MOEAs for solving continuous multi-objective RL problems [3.8936716676293917]
Multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) addresses the challenge of simultaneously optimizing multiple, often conflicting, rewards.<n>This paper investigates the applicability and limitations of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in solving complex MORL problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T20:54:20Z) - Autoformulation of Mathematical Optimization Models Using LLMs [50.030647274271516]
This paper approaches the problem of $textitautoformulation$: the automated creation of solver-ready optimization models from natural language problem descriptions.<n>We identify three core challenges of autoformulation: $textit(1)$ the vast, problem-dependent hypothesis space, and $textit(2)$ efficient and diverse exploration of this space under uncertainty.<n>We present a novel method leveraging $textitLarge Language Models$ with $textitMonte-Carlo Tree Search$, exploiting the hierarchical nature of optimization modeling to generate and systematically explore possible formulations
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-03T20:41:38Z) - Efficient and Effective Weight-Ensembling Mixture of Experts for Multi-Task Model Merging [111.8456671452411]
Multi-task learning (MTL) leverages a shared model to accomplish multiple tasks and facilitate knowledge transfer.
We propose a Weight-Ensembling Mixture of Experts (WEMoE) method for multi-task model merging.
We show that WEMoE and E-WEMoE outperform state-of-the-art (SOTA) model merging methods in terms of MTL performance, generalization, and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T07:16:31Z) - Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making.<n>Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate.<n>We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z) - Expensive Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Based on Diffusion Models [17.19004913553654]
Multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) has shown promising performance on various expensive multi-objective optimization problems (EMOPs)
We propose a novel Composite Diffusion Model based Pareto Set Learning algorithm, namely CDM-PSL, for expensive MOBO.
Our proposed algorithm attains superior performance compared with various state-of-the-art MOBO algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-14T14:55:57Z) - UCB-driven Utility Function Search for Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning [51.00436121587591]
In Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning (MORL) agents are tasked with optimising decision-making behaviours.<n>We focus on the case of linear utility functions parametrised by weight vectors w.<n>We introduce a method based on Upper Confidence Bound to efficiently search for the most promising weight vectors during different stages of the learning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T09:34:42Z) - Model Composition for Multimodal Large Language Models [71.5729418523411]
We propose a new paradigm through the model composition of existing MLLMs to create a new model that retains the modal understanding capabilities of each original model.
Our basic implementation, NaiveMC, demonstrates the effectiveness of this paradigm by reusing modality encoders and merging LLM parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T06:38:10Z) - Towards Robust Multi-Modal Reasoning via Model Selection [7.6621866737827045]
LLM serves as the "brain" of the agent, orchestrating multiple tools for collaborative multi-step task solving.
We propose the $textitM3$ framework as a plug-in with negligible runtime overhead at test-time.
Our experiments reveal that our framework enables dynamic model selection, considering both user inputs and subtask dependencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T16:06:18Z) - Pareto Set Learning for Neural Multi-objective Combinatorial
Optimization [6.091096843566857]
Multiobjective optimization (MOCO) problems can be found in many real-world applications.
We develop a learning-based approach to approximate the whole Pareto set for a given MOCO problem without further search procedure.
Our proposed method significantly outperforms some other methods on the multiobjective traveling salesman problem, multiconditioned vehicle routing problem and multi knapsack problem in terms of solution quality, speed, and model efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-29T09:26:22Z) - Discovering Diverse Solutions in Deep Reinforcement Learning [84.45686627019408]
Reinforcement learning algorithms are typically limited to learning a single solution of a specified task.
We propose an RL method that can learn infinitely many solutions by training a policy conditioned on a continuous or discrete low-dimensional latent variable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-12T04:54:31Z) - Multi-Domain Learning by Meta-Learning: Taking Optimal Steps in
Multi-Domain Loss Landscapes by Inner-Loop Learning [5.490618192331097]
We consider a model-agnostic solution to the problem of Multi-Domain Learning for multi-modal applications.
Our method is model-agnostic, requiring no additional model parameters and no network architecture changes.
We demonstrate our solution to a fitting problem in medical imaging, specifically, in the automatic segmentation of white matter hyperintensity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-25T19:54:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.