Can Large Language Models Adequately Perform Symbolic Reasoning Over Time Series?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03963v1
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 22:58:54 GMT
- Title: Can Large Language Models Adequately Perform Symbolic Reasoning Over Time Series?
- Authors: Zewen Liu, Juntong Ni, Xianfeng Tang, Max S. Y. Lau, Wei Jin,
- Abstract summary: We introduce SymbolBench, a benchmark to assess symbolic reasoning over real-world time series.<n>Unlike prior efforts, SymbolBench spans a diverse set of symbolic forms with varying complexity.<n>We propose a unified framework that integrates Large Language Models with genetic programming to form a closed-loop symbolic reasoning system.
- Score: 10.185545951475104
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Uncovering hidden symbolic laws from time series data, as an aspiration dating back to Kepler's discovery of planetary motion, remains a core challenge in scientific discovery and artificial intelligence. While Large Language Models show promise in structured reasoning tasks, their ability to infer interpretable, context-aligned symbolic structures from time series data is still underexplored. To systematically evaluate this capability, we introduce SymbolBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess symbolic reasoning over real-world time series across three tasks: multivariate symbolic regression, Boolean network inference, and causal discovery. Unlike prior efforts limited to simple algebraic equations, SymbolBench spans a diverse set of symbolic forms with varying complexity. We further propose a unified framework that integrates LLMs with genetic programming to form a closed-loop symbolic reasoning system, where LLMs act both as predictors and evaluators. Our empirical results reveal key strengths and limitations of current models, highlighting the importance of combining domain knowledge, context alignment, and reasoning structure to improve LLMs in automated scientific discovery.
Related papers
- Discrete JEPA: Learning Discrete Token Representations without Reconstruction [23.6286989806018]
Symbolic cornerstone of cognitive intelligence lies in extracting hidden patterns from observations.<n>We propose Discrete-JEPA, extending latent predictive coding framework with semantic tokenization.<n>Our approach promises a significant impact for advancing world modeling and planning capabilities in artificial intelligence systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T10:15:17Z) - Exploiting Symbolic Heuristics for the Synthesis of Domain-Specific Temporal Planning Guidance using Reinforcement Learning [51.54559117314768]
Recent work investigated the use of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the synthesis of guidance to improve the performance of temporal planners.<n>We propose an evolution of this learning and planning framework that focuses on exploiting the information provided by symbolics during both the RL and planning phases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T17:19:13Z) - Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Quasi-Symbolic Abstractions [45.950841507164064]
Chain-of-Though (CoT) represents a common strategy for reasoning in Large Language Models.<n>We present QuaSAR, a variation of CoT that guides LLMs to operate at a higher level of abstraction via quasi-symbolic explanations.<n>Our experiments show that quasi-symbolic abstractions can improve CoT-based methods by up to 8% accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T07:58:48Z) - Large Language Models Meet Symbolic Provers for Logical Reasoning Evaluation [24.081573908824353]
First-order logic (FOL) reasoning is pivotal for intelligent systems.<n>Existing benchmarks often rely on extensive human annotation or handcrafted templates.<n>We propose a novel framework called ProverGen that synergizes the generative strengths of Large Language Models with the rigor and precision of symbolic provers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T15:31:54Z) - CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge [44.59258397967782]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various natural language processing tasks.
We present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs' complex logical reasoning abilities.
We find that LLMs excel at reasoning over general world knowledge but face significant challenges with specialized domain-specific knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-30T05:40:32Z) - Investigating Symbolic Capabilities of Large Language Models [16.88906206735967]
This study aims to bridge the gap by rigorously evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on a series of symbolic tasks.
Our analysis encompasses eight LLMs, including four enterprise-grade and four open-source models, of which three have been pre-trained on mathematical tasks.
The findings reveal a significant decline in LLMs' performance on context-free and context-sensitive symbolic tasks as the complexity, represented by the number of symbols, increases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T21:24:34Z) - MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoning [63.80739044622555]
We introduce MuSR, a dataset for evaluating language models on soft reasoning tasks specified in a natural language narrative.
This dataset has two crucial features. First, it is created through a novel neurosymbolic synthetic-to-natural generation algorithm.
Second, our dataset instances are free text narratives corresponding to real-world domains of reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T17:59:20Z) - Discrete, compositional, and symbolic representations through attractor dynamics [51.20712945239422]
We introduce a novel neural systems model that integrates attractor dynamics with symbolic representations to model cognitive processes akin to the probabilistic language of thought (PLoT)
Our model segments the continuous representational space into discrete basins, with attractor states corresponding to symbolic sequences, that reflect the semanticity and compositionality characteristic of symbolic systems through unsupervised learning, rather than relying on pre-defined primitives.
This approach establishes a unified framework that integrates both symbolic and sub-symbolic processing through neural dynamics, a neuroplausible substrate with proven expressivity in AI, offering a more comprehensive model that mirrors the complex duality of cognitive operations
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T05:40:56Z) - Towards LogiGLUE: A Brief Survey and A Benchmark for Analyzing Logical Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models [56.34029644009297]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to overcome various limitations of formal Knowledge Representation (KR) systems.
LLMs excel most in abductive reasoning, followed by deductive reasoning, while they are least effective at inductive reasoning.
We study single-task training, multi-task training, and "chain-of-thought" knowledge distillation fine-tuning technique to assess the performance of model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T01:00:50Z) - LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and
Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge.
During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training.
These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z) - Symbolic Visual Reinforcement Learning: A Scalable Framework with
Object-Level Abstraction and Differentiable Expression Search [63.3745291252038]
We propose DiffSES, a novel symbolic learning approach that discovers discrete symbolic policies.
By using object-level abstractions instead of raw pixel-level inputs, DiffSES is able to leverage the simplicity and scalability advantages of symbolic expressions.
Our experiments demonstrate that DiffSES is able to generate symbolic policies that are simpler and more scalable than state-of-the-art symbolic RL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-30T17:50:54Z) - Interpretable Time-series Representation Learning With Multi-Level
Disentanglement [56.38489708031278]
Disentangle Time Series (DTS) is a novel disentanglement enhancement framework for sequential data.
DTS generates hierarchical semantic concepts as the interpretable and disentangled representation of time-series.
DTS achieves superior performance in downstream applications, with high interpretability of semantic concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-17T22:02:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.