P-Aligner: Enabling Pre-Alignment of Language Models via Principled Instruction Synthesis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04626v1
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 16:51:38 GMT
• Title: P-Aligner: Enabling Pre-Alignment of Language Models via Principled Instruction Synthesis
• Authors: Feifan Song, Bofei Gao, Yifan Song, Yi Liu, Weimin Xiong, Yuyang Song, Tianyu Liu, Guoyin Wang, Houfeng Wang,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are expected to produce safe, helpful, and honest content during interaction with human users.<n>LLMs frequently fail to align with such values when given flawed instructions.<n>P-Aligner is a lightweight module generating instructions that preserve the original intents while being expressed in a more human-preferred form.
• Score: 33.48877877146247
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are expected to produce safe, helpful, and honest content during interaction with human users, but they frequently fail to align with such values when given flawed instructions, e.g., missing context, ambiguous directives, or inappropriate tone, leaving substantial room for improvement along multiple dimensions. A cost-effective yet high-impact way is to pre-align instructions before the model begins decoding. Existing approaches either rely on prohibitive test-time search costs or end-to-end model rewrite, which is powered by a customized training corpus with unclear objectives. In this work, we demonstrate that the goal of efficient and effective preference alignment can be achieved by P-Aligner, a lightweight module generating instructions that preserve the original intents while being expressed in a more human-preferred form. P-Aligner is trained on UltraPrompt, a new dataset synthesized via a proposed principle-guided pipeline using Monte-Carlo Tree Search, which systematically explores the space of candidate instructions that are closely tied to human preference. Experiments across different methods show that P-Aligner generally outperforms strong baselines across various models and benchmarks, including average win-rate gains of 28.35% and 8.69% on GPT-4-turbo and Gemma-2-SimPO, respectively. Further analyses validate its effectiveness and efficiency through multiple perspectives, including data quality, search strategies, iterative deployment, and time overhead.

Related papers

• Multi-Preference Lambda-weighted Listwise DPO for Small-Scale Model Alignment [5.276657230880984]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong generalization across a wide range of language tasks, but often generate outputs that misalign with human preferences.<n>Direct Optimization Preference (DPO) simplifies the process by treating alignment as a classification task over binary preference pairs.<n>We propose Multi-Preference Lambda-weighted Listwise DPO, which allows the model to learn from more detailed human feedback.<n>Our method consistently outperforms standard DPO on alignment while enabling efficient, controllable, and fine-grained adaptation suitable for real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T16:47:17Z)
• Enhancing Training Data Attribution with Representational Optimization [57.61977909113113]
  Training data attribution methods aim to measure how training data impacts a model's predictions.<n>We propose AirRep, a representation-based approach that closes this gap by learning task-specific and model-aligned representations explicitly for TDA.<n>AirRep introduces two key innovations: a trainable encoder tuned for attribution quality, and an attention-based pooling mechanism that enables accurate estimation of group-wise influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T05:17:53Z)
• RankPO: Preference Optimization for Job-Talent Matching [7.385902340910447]
  We propose a two-stage training framework for large language models (LLMs)<n>In the first stage, a contrastive learning approach is used to train the model on a dataset constructed from real-world matching rules.<n>In the second stage, we introduce a novel preference-based fine-tuning method inspired by Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to align the model with AI-curated pairwise preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T10:14:37Z)
• PIPA: Preference Alignment as Prior-Informed Statistical Estimation [57.24096291517857]
  We introduce Pior-Informed Preference Alignment (PIPA), a unified, RL-free probabilistic framework.<n> PIPA accommodates both paired and unpaired data, as well as answer and step-level annotations.<n>By integrating different types of prior information, we developed two variations of PIPA: PIPA-M and PIPA-N.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T04:31:30Z)
• Multimodal Preference Data Synthetic Alignment with Reward Model [23.978820500281213]
  We propose a new framework in generating synthetic data using a reward model as a proxy of human preference for effective multimodal alignment with DPO training.<n>Experiment results indicate that integrating selected synthetic data, such as from generative and rewards models can effectively reduce reliance on human-annotated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T09:29:40Z)
• SPaR: Self-Play with Tree-Search Refinement to Improve Instruction-Following in Large Language Models [88.29990536278167]
  We introduce SPaR, a self-play framework integrating tree-search self-refinement to yield valid and comparable preference pairs.<n>Our experiments show that a LLaMA3-8B model, trained over three iterations guided by SPaR, surpasses GPT-4-Turbo on the IFEval benchmark without losing general capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T09:47:43Z)
• Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [75.83359213697854]
  Recent advancements suggest that directly working with preference probabilities can yield a more accurate reflection of human preferences. We propose a self-play-based method for language model alignment, which treats the problem as a constant-sum two-player game. Our approach, dubbed Self-Play Preference Optimization (SPPO), utilizes iterative policy updates to provably approximate the Nash equilibrium.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T17:59:20Z)
• Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback [70.32795295142648]
  Linear alignment is a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step. Experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-21T10:46:23Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models with Counterfactual DPO [1.8130068086063336]
  This paper explores the utilization of counterfactual prompting to align the model's style without relying on human intervention. We demonstrate that this method effectively instils desirable behaviour, mitigates undesirable ones, and encourages the model to disregard inappropriate instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T19:43:43Z)
• Dialogue for Prompting: a Policy-Gradient-Based Discrete Prompt Generation for Few-shot Learning [14.200398093260118]
  Prior discrete prompt optimization methods require expert knowledge to design the base prompt set and identify high-quality prompts. Existing continuous prompt optimization methods improve the performance by learning the ideal prompts. By training a policy network with only 0.67% of the PLM parameter size on the tasks in the few-shot setting, $DPO$ outperforms the state-of-the-art (SOTA) method by 1.52% in accuracy on four open-source datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T16:58:50Z)
• Approximated Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Pre-trained Models [54.326232586461614]
  In vision-language pre-trained models, prompt tuning often requires a large number of learnable tokens to bridge the gap between the pre-training and downstream tasks. We propose a novel Approximated Prompt Tuning (APT) approach towards efficient VL transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T05:43:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.