Differentially Private Model-X Knockoffs via Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04800v1
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 18:16:53 GMT
• Title: Differentially Private Model-X Knockoffs via Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform
• Authors: Yuxuan Tao, Adel Javanmard,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel privatization framework for high-dimensional controlled variable selection.<n>Our framework enables rigorous False Discovery Rate (FDR) control under differential privacy constraints.<n>This work bridges two critical paradigms -- knockoff-based FDR control and private data release.
• Score: 3.5297361401370044
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We introduce a novel privatization framework for high-dimensional controlled variable selection. Our framework enables rigorous False Discovery Rate (FDR) control under differential privacy constraints. While the Model-X knockoff procedure provides FDR guarantees by constructing provably exchangeable ``negative control" features, existing privacy mechanisms like Laplace or Gaussian noise injection disrupt its core exchangeability conditions. Our key innovation lies in privatizing the data knockoff matrix through the Gaussian Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transformation (JLT), a dimension reduction technique that simultaneously preserves covariate relationships through approximate isometry for $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differential privacy. We theoretically characterize both FDR and the power of the proposed private variable selection procedure, in an asymptotic regime. Our theoretical analysis characterizes the role of different factors, such as the JLT's dimension reduction ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, differential privacy parameters, sample size and feature dimension, in shaping the privacy-power trade-off. Our analysis is based on a novel `debiasing technique' for high-dimensional private knockoff procedure. We further establish sufficient conditions under which the power of the proposed procedure converges to one. This work bridges two critical paradigms -- knockoff-based FDR control and private data release -- enabling reliable variable selection in sensitive domains. Our analysis demonstrates that structural privacy preservation through random projections outperforms the classical noise addition mechanism, maintaining statistical power even under strict privacy budgets.

Related papers

• ImprovDML: Improved Trade-off in Private Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Machine Learning [22.85986751447643]
  A common strategy involves integrating Byzantine-resilient aggregation rules with differential privacy mechanisms.<n>We propose ImprovDML, that achieves model accuracy while simultaneously ensuring privacy preservation.<n>We demonstrate that it enables an improved trade-off between model accuracy and differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T06:53:52Z)
• Knockoffs Inference under Privacy Constraints [7.615990547453691]
  We propose a comprehensive framework for knockoff inference within the differential privacy paradigm.<n>Our proposed method guarantees robust privacy protection while preserving the exact FDR control entailed by the original model-X knockoff procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T13:06:21Z)
• Differentially Private Random Feature Model [52.468511541184895]
  We produce a differentially private random feature model for privacy-preserving kernel machines.<n>We show that our method preserves privacy and derive a generalization error bound for the method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T05:31:08Z)
• Private Language Models via Truncated Laplacian Mechanism [18.77713904999236]
  We propose a novel private embedding method called the high dimensional truncated Laplacian mechanism. We show that our method has a lower variance compared to the previous private word embedding methods. Remarkably, even in the high privacy regime, our approach only incurs a slight decrease in utility compared to the non-private scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T15:25:02Z)
• Convergent Differential Privacy Analysis for General Federated Learning: the $f$-DP Perspective [57.35402286842029]
  Federated learning (FL) is an efficient collaborative training paradigm with a focus on local privacy. differential privacy (DP) is a classical approach to capture and ensure the reliability of private protections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T08:22:21Z)
• Bounded and Unbiased Composite Differential Privacy [25.427802467876248]
  The objective of differential privacy (DP) is to protect privacy by producing an output distribution that is indistinguishable between two neighboring databases. Existing solutions attempt to address this issue by employing post-processing or truncation techniques. We propose a novel differentially private mechanism which uses a composite probability density function to generate bounded and unbiased outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-04T04:43:47Z)
• Adaptive False Discovery Rate Control with Privacy Guarantee [1.4213973379473654]
  We propose a differentially private adaptive FDR control method that can control the classic FDR metric exactly at a user-specified level $alpha$ with privacy guarantee. Compared to the non-private AdaPT, it incurs a small accuracy loss but significantly reduces the computation cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T01:22:15Z)
• Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with $f$-Differential Privacy [51.11280118806893]
  We consider a federated data analytics problem in which a server coordinates the collaborative data analysis of multiple users with privacy concerns and limited communication capability. We study the local differential privacy guarantees of discrete-valued mechanisms with finite output space through the lens of $f$-differential privacy (DP) More specifically, we advance the existing literature by deriving tight $f$-DP guarantees for a variety of discrete-valued mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T16:58:53Z)
• Stronger Privacy Amplification by Shuffling for R\'enyi and Approximate Differential Privacy [43.33288245778629]
  A key result in this model is that randomly shuffling locally randomized data amplifies differential privacy guarantees. Such amplification implies substantially stronger privacy guarantees for systems in which data is contributed anonymously. In this work, we improve the state of the art privacy amplification by shuffling results both theoretically and numerically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-09T08:13:48Z)
• Error-based Knockoffs Inference for Controlled Feature Selection [49.99321384855201]
  We propose an error-based knockoff inference method by integrating the knockoff features, the error-based feature importance statistics, and the stepdown procedure together. The proposed inference procedure does not require specifying a regression model and can handle feature selection with theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T01:55:59Z)
• Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy [70.818129585404]
  We experimentally demonstrate that networks, trained with differential privacy, in some settings might be even more vulnerable in comparison to non-private versions. We study how the main ingredients of differentially private neural networks training, such as gradient clipping and noise addition, affect the robustness of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T18:59:24Z)
• Differentially Private Federated Learning with Laplacian Smoothing [72.85272874099644]
  Federated learning aims to protect data privacy by collaboratively learning a model without sharing private data among users. An adversary may still be able to infer the private training data by attacking the released model. Differential privacy provides a statistical protection against such attacks at the price of significantly degrading the accuracy or utility of the trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T04:28:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.