Leveraging LLMs for Privacy-Aware Predictions in Participatory Budgeting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06577v1
• Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 15:26:22 GMT
• Title: Leveraging LLMs for Privacy-Aware Predictions in Participatory Budgeting
• Authors: Juan Zambrano, Clément Contet, Jairo Gudiño, Felipe Garrido-Lucero, Umberto Grandi, Cesar A Hidalgo,
• Abstract summary: Participatory Budgeting empowers citizens to propose and vote on public investment projects.<n>Despite its democratic potential, PB initiatives often suffer from low participation rates, limiting their visibility and perceived legitimacy.<n>We propose a privacy-preserving approach to predict which PB proposals are likely to be funded, using only their textual descriptions and anonymous historical voting records.
• Score: 5.126601234881228
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Participatory Budgeting (PB) empowers citizens to propose and vote on public investment projects. Yet, despite its democratic potential, PB initiatives often suffer from low participation rates, limiting their visibility and perceived legitimacy. In this work, we aim to strengthen PB elections in two key ways: by supporting project proposers in crafting better proposals, and by helping PB organizers manage large volumes of submissions in a transparent manner. We propose a privacy-preserving approach to predict which PB proposals are likely to be funded, using only their textual descriptions and anonymous historical voting records -- without relying on voter demographics or personally identifiable information. We evaluate the performance of GPT 4 Turbo in forecasting proposal outcomes across varying contextual scenarios, observing that the LLM's prior knowledge needs to be complemented by past voting data to obtain predictions reflecting real-world PB voting behavior. Our findings highlight the potential of AI-driven tools to support PB processes by improving transparency, planning efficiency, and civic engagement.

Related papers

• Fair Compromises in Participatory Budgeting: a Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach [0.8192907805418581]
  Participatory budgeting requires voters to make decisions on projects which can lead to choice overload'<n>A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach to decision support can make decision making easier for voters by identifying voting strategies that increase the winning proportion of their vote.<n>This paper presents a novel, ethically aligned approach to decision support using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning modelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T11:46:13Z)
• PBa-LLM: Privacy- and Bias-aware NLP using Named-Entity Recognition (NER) [45.870212237420226]
  This work explores the use of Named- Entity Recognition (NER) to facilitate the privacy-preserving training of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose a framework that uses NER technologies to anonymize sensitive information in text data, such as personal identities or geographic locations.<n>The study involved two language models (BERT and RoBERTa) and six anonymization algorithms (based on Presidio, FLAIR, BERT, and different versions of GPT) applied to a database of 24,000 candidate profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T14:42:49Z)
• ElectionSim: Massive Population Election Simulation Powered by Large Language Model Driven Agents [70.17229548653852]
  We introduce ElectionSim, an innovative election simulation framework based on large language models. We present a million-level voter pool sampled from social media platforms to support accurate individual simulation. We also introduce PPE, a poll-based presidential election benchmark to assess the performance of our framework under the U.S. presidential election scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T05:25:50Z)
• TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights [73.9088920210495]
  We propose a token-level importance sampling DPO objective named TIS-DPO that assigns importance weights to each token based on its reward.<n>TIS-DPO significantly outperforms various baseline methods on harmlessness and helpfulness alignment and summarization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T04:03:00Z)
• Designing Digital Voting Systems for Citizens: Achieving Fairness and Legitimacy in Participatory Budgeting [10.977733942901535]
  Participatory Budgeting (PB) has evolved into a key democratic instrument for resource allocation in cities. This work presents the results of behavioural experiments where participants were asked to vote in a fictional PB setting. We identify approaches to designing PB voting that minimise cognitive load and enhance the perceived fairness and legitimacy of the digital process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T12:25:48Z)
• Improving City Life via Legitimate and Participatory Policy-making: A Data-driven Approach in Switzerland [2.5234156040689237]
  This paper focuses on a case study of 1,204 citizens in the city of Aarau, Switzerland. We analyze survey data containing insightful indicators that can impact the legitimacy of decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T13:38:39Z)
• Users are the North Star for AI Transparency [111.5679109784322]
  Despite widespread calls for transparent artificial intelligence systems, the term is too overburdened with disparate meanings to express precise policy aims or to orient concrete lines of research. Part of why this happens is that a clear ideal of AI transparency goes unsaid in this body of work. We explicitly name such a north star -- transparency that is user-centered, user-appropriate, and honest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T18:53:29Z)
• Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest [70.02478301291264]
  Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse. Prior studies have used black-box methods to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T17:32:35Z)
• Sequential Information Design: Markov Persuasion Process and Its Efficient Reinforcement Learning [156.5667417159582]
  This paper proposes a novel model of sequential information design, namely the Markov persuasion processes (MPPs) Planning in MPPs faces the unique challenge in finding a signaling policy that is simultaneously persuasive to the myopic receivers and inducing the optimal long-term cumulative utilities of the sender. We design a provably efficient no-regret learning algorithm, the Optimism-Pessimism Principle for Persuasion Process (OP4), which features a novel combination of both optimism and pessimism principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-22T05:41:43Z)
• Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy [22.682698778214434]
  We report on the progress of a project that aims to address barriers to citizen participation in democratic decision-making processes. The main objectives are to explore if the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning can improve citizens' experience of digital citizen participation platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-28T13:30:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.