A Dual-Axis Taxonomy of Knowledge Editing for LLMs: From Mechanisms to Functions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08795v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 09:51:39 GMT
• Title: A Dual-Axis Taxonomy of Knowledge Editing for LLMs: From Mechanisms to Functions
• Authors: Amir Mohammad Salehoof, Ali Ramezani, Yadollah Yaghoobzadeh, Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) acquire vast knowledge from large text corpora, but this information can become outdated or inaccurate.<n>Since retraining is computationally expensive, knowledge editing offers an efficient alternative -- modifying internal knowledge without full retraining.<n>This survey introduces a novel, complementary function-based taxonomy to provide a more holistic view.
• Score: 6.051561613968997
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) acquire vast knowledge from large text corpora, but this information can become outdated or inaccurate. Since retraining is computationally expensive, knowledge editing offers an efficient alternative -- modifying internal knowledge without full retraining. These methods aim to update facts precisely while preserving the model's overall capabilities. While existing surveys focus on the mechanism of editing (e.g., parameter changes vs. external memory), they often overlook the function of the knowledge being edited. This survey introduces a novel, complementary function-based taxonomy to provide a more holistic view. We examine how different mechanisms apply to various knowledge types -- factual, temporal, conceptual, commonsense, and social -- highlighting how editing effectiveness depends on the nature of the target knowledge. By organizing our review along these two axes, we map the current landscape, outline the strengths and limitations of existing methods, define the problem formally, survey evaluation tasks and datasets, and conclude with open challenges and future directions.

Related papers

• Knowledge Updating? No More Model Editing! Just Selective Contextual Reasoning [38.018263569983226]
  We provide an evaluation of ten model editing methods along four dimensions: reliability, generalization, locality, and portability.<n>We then propose a straightforward method called Selective Contextual Reasoning (SCR) for knowledge updating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T08:04:25Z)
• GeoEdit: Geometric Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [52.37408324849593]
  Regular updates are essential for maintaining up-to-date knowledge in large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose a novel framework called Geometric Knowledge Editing (GeoEdit)<n>GeoEdit distinguishes between neurons associated with new knowledge updates and those related to general knowledge perturbations.<n>For the remaining neurons, we integrate both old and new knowledge for aligned directions and apply a "forget-then-learn" editing strategy for opposite directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T10:27:48Z)
• K-Edit: Language Model Editing with Contextual Knowledge Awareness [71.73747181407323]
  Knowledge-based model editing enables precise modifications to the weights of large language models.<n>We present K-Edit, an effective approach to generating contextually consistent knowledge edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T01:35:13Z)
• Related Knowledge Perturbation Matters: Rethinking Multiple Pieces of Knowledge Editing in Same-Subject [49.559994791305535]
  Current state-of-the-art editing methods struggle when tasked with editing multiple related knowledge pieces for the same subject.<n>We introduce the $textS2textRKE$(Same-Subject Related Knowledge Editing) benchmark.<n>Our experiments reveal that only mainstream locate-then-edit methods, such as ROME and MEMIT, exhibit "related knowledge perturbation"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T04:47:17Z)
• Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models [26.516571783335824]
  Recent studies have identified side effects, such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities, that have emerged after editing. This survey presents a comprehensive study of these side effects, providing a unified perspective on the challenges of knowledge editing in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T15:28:21Z)
• AKEW: Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild [79.96813982502952]
  AKEW (Assessing Knowledge Editing in the Wild) is a new practical benchmark for knowledge editing. It fully covers three editing settings of knowledge updates: structured facts, unstructured texts as facts, and extracted triplets. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the considerable gap between state-of-the-art knowledge-editing methods and practical scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T07:08:34Z)
• Propagation and Pitfalls: Reasoning-based Assessment of Knowledge Editing through Counterfactual Tasks [36.292901021210575]
  We introduce a novel reasoning-based benchmark -- ReCoE (Reasoning-based Counterfactual Editing dataset) We conduct a thorough analysis of existing knowledge editing techniques, including input augmentation, finetuning, and locate-and-edit. All model editing methods show notably low performance on this dataset, especially in certain reasoning schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T04:12:59Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• History Matters: Temporal Knowledge Editing in Large Language Model [42.74144542674756]
  We introduce the task of Temporal Knowledge Editing (TKE) and establish a benchmark AToKe to evaluate current model editing methods. We find that while existing model editing methods are effective at making models remember new knowledge, the edited model catastrophically forgets historical knowledge. To address this gap, we propose a simple and general framework termed Multi-Editing with Time Objective (METO) for enhancing existing editing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-09T07:51:56Z)
• Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge [72.63368052592004]
  We study LMs' abilities to make inferences based on injected facts (or propagate those facts) We find that existing methods for updating knowledge show little propagation of injected knowledge. Yet, prepending entity definitions in an LM's context improves performance across all settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T17:59:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.