Beyond Solving Math Quiz: Evaluating the Ability of Large Reasoning Models to Ask for Information

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11252v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 06:42:00 GMT
• Title: Beyond Solving Math Quiz: Evaluating the Ability of Large Reasoning Models to Ask for Information
• Authors: Youcheng Huang, Bowen Qin, Chen Huang, Duanyu Feng, Xi Yang, Wenqiang Lei,
• Abstract summary: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable problem-solving abilities in mathematics.<n>We propose a new dataset consisting of two types of incomplete problems with diverse contexts.<n>Based on the dataset, our systematical evaluation of LRMs reveals their inability in proactively asking for information.
• Score: 21.562453754113072
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable problem-solving abilities in mathematics, as evaluated by existing benchmarks exclusively on well-defined problems. However, such evaluation setup constitutes a critical gap, since a genuine intelligent agent should not only solve problems (as a math quiz solver), but also be able~to ask for information when the problems lack sufficient information, enabling proactivity in responding users' requests. To bridge such gap, we proposes a new dataset consisting of two types of incomplete problems with diverse contexts. Based on the dataset, our systematical evaluation of LRMs reveals their inability in proactively asking for information. In addition, we uncover the behaviors related to overthinking and hallucination of LRMs, and highlight the potential and challenges of supervised fine-tuning in learning such ability. We hope to provide new insights in developing LRMs with genuine intelligence, rather than just solving problems.

Related papers

• Teaching Language Models To Gather Information Proactively [53.85419549904644]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to function as collaborative partners.<n>In this work, we introduce a new task paradigm: proactive information gathering.<n>We design a scalable framework that generates partially specified, real-world tasks, masking key information.<n>Within this setup, our core innovation is a reinforcement finetuning strategy that rewards questions that elicit genuinely new, implicit user information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T23:50:09Z)
• SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning [95.28059121743831]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective for training large language models (LLMs) on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce a Self-aware Weakness-driven problem Synthesis framework (SwS) that systematically identifies model deficiencies and leverages them for problem augmentation.<n>SwS enables robust generalization byempowering the model to self-identify and address its weaknesses in RL, yielding average performance gains of 10.0% and 7.7% on 7B and 32B models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T17:02:00Z)
• FindTheFlaws: Annotated Errors for Detecting Flawed Reasoning and Scalable Oversight Research [0.6286531904189063]
  Approaches to scaling AI supervision include debate, critique, and prover-verifier games.<n>We present FindTheFlaws, a group of five diverse datasets spanning medicine, mathematics, science, coding, and the Lojban language.<n>We evaluate frontier models' critiquing capabilities and observe a range of performance that can be leveraged for scalable oversight experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T06:38:30Z)
• Unleashing LLM Reasoning Capability via Scalable Question Synthesis from Scratch [54.12139707822201]
  We propose ScaleQuest, a novel, scalable, and cost-effective data synthesis method.<n>By generating diverse questions from scratch, we produce a dataset of 1 million problem-solution pairs.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that models trained on our data outperform existing open-source datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T12:42:04Z)
• ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection [60.297079601066784]
  We introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' capabilities in error detection. ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization. It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions. Results indicate significant challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T14:59:09Z)
• MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains [54.117238759317004]
  Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark features comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T00:58:41Z)
• MathOdyssey: Benchmarking Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Large Language Models Using Odyssey Math Data [20.31528845718877]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language understanding and demonstrated strong problem-solving abilities. This paper investigates the mathematical problem-solving capabilities of LLMs using the newly developed "MathOdyssey" dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T13:02:35Z)
• Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Solving Financial Question Answering [5.10832476049103]
  FinQA introduced a numerical reasoning dataset for financial documents. We propose a novel approach to tackle numerical reasoning problems using case based reasoning (CBR) Our model retrieves relevant cases to address a given question, and then generates an answer based on the retrieved cases and contextual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T10:06:55Z)
• UNK-VQA: A Dataset and a Probe into the Abstention Ability of Multi-modal Large Models [55.22048505787125]
  This paper contributes a comprehensive dataset, called UNK-VQA. We first augment the existing data via deliberate perturbations on either the image or question. We then extensively evaluate the zero- and few-shot performance of several emerging multi-modal large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T02:38:09Z)
• BoardgameQA: A Dataset for Natural Language Reasoning with Contradictory Information [11.299785330182004]
  Language Models (LMs) have demonstrated complex reasoning capacities even without any finetuning. This paper formulates the problem of reasoning with contradictory information guided by preferences over sources as the classical problem of defeasible reasoning. We benchmark various LMs on BoardgameQA and the results reveal a significant gap in the reasoning capacity of state-of-the-art LMs on this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T17:39:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.