Chart-CoCa: Self-Improving Chart Understanding of Vision LMs via Code-Driven Synthesis and Candidate-Conditioned Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11975v1
• Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 08:26:55 GMT
• Title: Chart-CoCa: Self-Improving Chart Understanding of Vision LMs via Code-Driven Synthesis and Candidate-Conditioned Answering
• Authors: Gongyao Jiang, Qiong Luo,
• Abstract summary: Vision Language Models (VLMs) often struggle with chart understanding tasks, particularly in accurate chart description and complex reasoning.<n>We introduce a chart synthesis pipeline that generates aligned chart-question-answer triplets through code generation and execution.<n>Experiments demonstrate significant improvements, with up to 15.50 points accuracy gain over the initial VLM.
• Score: 4.036085193573325
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision Language Models (VLMs) often struggle with chart understanding tasks, particularly in accurate chart description and complex reasoning. Synthetic data generation is a promising solution, while usually facing the challenge of noise labels. To address this challenge, we first introduce a chart synthesis pipeline that generates aligned chart-question-answer triplets through code generation and execution, ensuring the reliability of synthetic data without human intervention. Furthermore, inspired by test-time scaling that increases inference budget and thereby improves performance, we design a candidate-conditioned answering process. The VLM first generates multiple responses per query, and then synthesizes the final answer by contextualizing these candidates. Experiments demonstrate significant improvements, with up to 15.50 points accuracy gain over the initial VLM, in a fully self-improving paradigm without either human-labeled data or external models.

Related papers

• ChartVerse: Scaling Chart Reasoning via Reliable Programmatic Synthesis from Scratch [57.01439313241121]
  We introduce Rollout Posterior Entropy (RPE), a novel metric that quantifies chart complexity.<n>We also develop truth-anchored inverse QA synthesis to guarantee reasoning rigor.<n>To further elevate difficulty and reasoning depth, we filter samples based on model fail-rate and distill high-quality Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T05:11:44Z)
• Learning to Pose Problems: Reasoning-Driven and Solver-Adaptive Data Synthesis for Large Reasoning Models [54.29243291958429]
  We develop a problem generator that reasons explicitly to plan problem directions before synthesis.<n>We treat the solver's feedback on synthetic problems as a reward signal, enabling the generator to calibrate difficulty.<n>Our method achieves an average improvement of 2.5% and generalizes to both language and vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T03:08:51Z)
• Effective Training Data Synthesis for Improving MLLM Chart Understanding [21.347586170711608]
  We show that modularizing chart generation and diversifying visual details improves chart understanding capabilities.<n>In particular, we design a five-step data synthesis pipeline, where we separate data and function creation for single plot generation.<n>This approach allows us to streamline the generation of fine-tuning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T17:59:10Z)
• Align-GRAG: Reasoning-Guided Dual Alignment for Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation [75.9865035064794]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but still struggle with issues like hallucinations and outdated information.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) addresses these issues by grounding LLM outputs in external knowledge with an Information Retrieval (IR) system.<n>We propose Align-GRAG, a novel reasoning-guided dual alignment framework in post-retrieval phrase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T05:15:27Z)
• Chart-HQA: A Benchmark for Hypothetical Question Answering in Charts [62.45232157149698]
  We introduce a novel Chart Hypothetical Question Answering (HQA) task, which imposes assumptions on the same question to compel models to engage in counterfactual reasoning based on the chart content.<n> Furthermore, we introduce HAI, a human-AI interactive data synthesis approach that leverages the efficient text-editing capabilities of MLLMs alongside human expert knowledge to generate diverse and high-quality HQA data at a low cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T05:08:40Z)
• SPARC: Score Prompting and Adaptive Fusion for Zero-Shot Multi-Label Recognition in Vision-Language Models [74.40683913645731]
  Zero-shot multi-label recognition (MLR) with Vision-Language Models (VLMs) faces significant challenges without training data, model tuning, or architectural modifications.<n>Our work proposes a novel solution treating VLMs as black boxes, leveraging scores without training data or ground truth.<n>Analysis of these prompt scores reveals VLM biases and AND''/OR' signal ambiguities, notably that maximum scores are surprisingly suboptimal compared to second-highest scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T07:15:05Z)
• Instance-Aware Graph Prompt Learning [71.26108600288308]
  We introduce Instance-Aware Graph Prompt Learning (IA-GPL) in this paper. The process involves generating intermediate prompts for each instance using a lightweight architecture. Experiments conducted on multiple datasets and settings showcase the superior performance of IA-GPL compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T18:38:38Z)
• Trust but Verify: Programmatic VLM Evaluation in the Wild [62.14071929143684]
  Programmatic VLM Evaluation (PROVE) is a new benchmarking paradigm for evaluating VLM responses to open-ended queries. We benchmark the helpfulness-truthfulness trade-offs of a range ofVLMs on PROVE, finding that very few are in-fact able to achieve a good balance between the two.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T01:19:18Z)
• Charting the Future: Using Chart Question-Answering for Scalable Evaluation of LLM-Driven Data Visualizations [7.32619928577074]
  We propose a novel framework that leverages Visual Question Answering (VQA) models to automate the evaluation of LLM-generated data visualizations. Our results indicate that LLM-generated charts do not match the accuracy of the original non-LLM-generated charts based on VQA performance measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T14:02:48Z)
• From the Least to the Most: Building a Plug-and-Play Visual Reasoner via Data Synthesis [38.256412418893554]
  We explore multi-step reasoning in vision-language models (VLMs) We first introduce a least-to-most visual reasoning paradigm, which interleaves steps of a question into sub-questions. We propose a novel data synthesis approach that can automatically create questions and multi-step reasoning paths for an image.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T14:04:10Z)
• Synthesize Step-by-Step: Tools, Templates and LLMs as Data Generators for Reasoning-Based Chart VQA [9.659820850719413]
  We leverage Large Language Models (LLMs), which have shown to have strong reasoning ability, as an automatic data annotator. Key innovation in our method lies in the Synthesize Step-by-Step strategy. We significantly enhance the chart VQA models, achieving the state-of-the-art accuracy on the ChartQA and PlotQA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T03:02:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.