Unified Conformalized Multiple Testing with Full Data Efficiency

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12085v1
• Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 15:45:29 GMT
• Title: Unified Conformalized Multiple Testing with Full Data Efficiency
• Abstract summary: We propose a unified framework that puts data utilization at the center.<n>It uses all available data-null, alternative, and unlabeled-to construct scores and calibrate p-values through a full permutation strategy.
• Score: 2.156170153103442
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conformalized multiple testing offers a model-free way to control predictive uncertainty in decision-making. Existing methods typically use only part of the available data to build score functions tailored to specific settings. We propose a unified framework that puts data utilization at the center: it uses all available data-null, alternative, and unlabeled-to construct scores and calibrate p-values through a full permutation strategy. This unified use of all available data significantly improves power by enhancing non-conformity score quality and maximizing calibration set size while rigorously controlling the false discovery rate. Crucially, our framework provides a systematic design principle for conformal testing and enables automatic selection of the best conformal procedure among candidates without extra data splitting. Extensive numerical experiments demonstrate that our enhanced methods deliver superior efficiency and adaptability across diverse scenarios.

Related papers

• Preference Data Selection for Mitigating the Alignment Tax in Large Language Models [52.18310687523229]
  BALIGN is a balanced data selection strategy that mitigates catastrophic forgetting while optimizing alignment efficacy.<n>By aggregating three key data-centric features into a unified composite risk score, BALIGN systematically filters out high-risk preference samples.<n>Experiments on standard human preference datasets demonstrate that BALIGN strongly preserves foundational capabilities without compromising alignment gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T07:58:42Z)
• Reliability-Aware Determinantal Point Processes for Robust Informative Data Selection in Large Language Models [6.463509584149428]
  We introduce ProbDPP, a reliability-aware implementation of k-DPP that accounts for probabilistic data access.<n>We frame this reliability-aware diversity as a semi-bandit problem and propose a UCB-style algorithm to efficiently learn unknown reliability online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T20:14:33Z)
• Add-One-In: Incremental Sample Selection for Large Language Models via a Choice-Based Greedy Paradigm [50.492124556982674]
  This paper introduces a novel choice-based sample selection framework.<n>It shifts the focus from evaluating individual sample quality to comparing the contribution value of different samples.<n>We validate our approach on a larger medical dataset, highlighting its practical applicability in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T07:32:41Z)
• Optimized Conformal Selection: Powerful Selective Inference After Conformity Score Optimization [4.984656106595651]
  This paper presents OptCS, a framework that allows valid statistical testing (selection) after flexible data-driven model optimization.<n>We introduce general conditions under which OptCS constructs valid conformal p-values despite substantial data reuse.<n>We propose three FDR-controlling procedures, each optimizing the models differently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T01:40:50Z)
• A CLIP-Powered Framework for Robust and Generalizable Data Selection [51.46695086779598]
  Real-world datasets often contain redundant and noisy data, imposing a negative impact on training efficiency and model performance.<n>Data selection has shown promise in identifying the most representative samples from the entire dataset.<n>We propose a novel CLIP-powered data selection framework that leverages multimodal information for more robust and generalizable sample selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T03:00:58Z)
• An incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting [53.36437745983783]
  We first construct a max-margin optimization-based model to model potentially non-monotonic preferences. We devise information amount measurement methods and question selection strategies to pinpoint the most informative alternative in each iteration. Two incremental preference elicitation-based algorithms are developed to learn potentially non-monotonic preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T14:36:20Z)
• Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Bandits [61.740094604552475]
  We aim to learn decision policies that optimize an unbiased offline estimate of an online reward metric. We propose a single framework built on their equivalence in learning scenarios. Our framework enables us to characterize the variance-optimal unbiased estimator and provide a closed-form solution for it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:52:22Z)
• Adaptive Selection of the Optimal Strategy to Improve Precision and Power in Randomized Trials [2.048226951354646]
  We show how to select the adjustment approach -- which variables and in which form -- to maximize precision. Our approach maintains Type-I error control (under the null) and offers substantial gains in precision. When applied to real data, we also see meaningful efficiency improvements overall and within subgroups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T16:25:38Z)
• Joint Adaptive Graph and Structured Sparsity Regularization for Unsupervised Feature Selection [6.41804410246642]
  We propose a joint adaptive graph and structured sparsity regularization unsupervised feature selection (JASFS) method. A subset of optimal features will be selected in group, and the number of selected features will be determined automatically. Experimental results on eight benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T08:17:04Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)
• Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness [61.767399505764736]
  We consider fairness in the integration component of data management. We propose an approach to identify a sub-collection of features that ensure the fairness of the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T20:20:10Z)
• Outlier Detection Ensemble with Embedded Feature Selection [42.8338013000469]
  We propose an outlier detection ensemble framework with embedded feature selection (ODEFS) For each random sub-sampling based learning component, ODEFS unifies feature selection and outlier detection into a pairwise ranking formulation. We adopt the thresholded self-paced learning to simultaneously optimize feature selection and example selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-15T13:14:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.