Wisdom of the Crowd: Reinforcement Learning from Coevolutionary Collective Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12338v1
• Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 11:57:34 GMT
• Title: Wisdom of the Crowd: Reinforcement Learning from Coevolutionary Collective Feedback
• Authors: Wenzhen Yuan, Shengji Tang, Weihao Lin, Jiacheng Ruan, Ganqu Cui, Bo Zhang, Tao Chen, Ting Liu, Yuzhuo Fu, Peng Ye, Lei Bai,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but its reliance on expensive human-labeled data or complex reward models severely limits scalability.<n>We propose Reinforcement Learning from Coevolutionary Collective Feedback (RLCCF), a novel RL framework that enables multi-model collaborative evolution without external supervision.
• Score: 33.64877246216574
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but its reliance on expensive human-labeled data or complex reward models severely limits scalability. While existing self-feedback methods aim to address this problem, they are constrained by the capabilities of a single model, which can lead to overconfidence in incorrect answers, reward hacking, and even training collapse. To this end, we propose Reinforcement Learning from Coevolutionary Collective Feedback (RLCCF), a novel RL framework that enables multi-model collaborative evolution without external supervision. Specifically, RLCCF optimizes the ability of a model collective by maximizing its Collective Consistency (CC), which jointly trains a diverse ensemble of LLMs and provides reward signals by voting on collective outputs. Moreover, each model's vote is weighted by its Self-Consistency (SC) score, ensuring that more confident models contribute more to the collective decision. Benefiting from the diverse output distributions and complementary abilities of multiple LLMs, RLCCF enables the model collective to continuously enhance its reasoning ability through coevolution. Experiments on four mainstream open-source LLMs across four mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our framework yields significant performance gains, achieving an average relative improvement of 16.72\% in accuracy. Notably, RLCCF not only improves the performance of individual models but also enhances the group's majority-voting accuracy by 4.51\%, demonstrating its ability to extend the collective capability boundary of the model collective.

Related papers

• Coupled Variational Reinforcement Learning for Language Model General Reasoning [83.82392089177841]
  We propose textitbCoupled bVari bReinforcement bLearning (CoVRL) to bridge variational inference and reinforcement learning.<n>CoVRL improves performance by 12.4% over the base model and achieves an additional 2.3% improvement over strong state-of-the-art verifier-free RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T07:03:51Z)
• Rewarding the Journey, Not Just the Destination: A Composite Path and Answer Self-Scoring Reward Mechanism for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning [29.778703252962092]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for advancing Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We develop a novel test-time reward mechanism that operates without external supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T07:53:51Z)
• Confidence as a Reward: Transforming LLMs into Reward Models [54.98336080630691]
  Confidence-as-a-Reward (CRew) is a training-free method that utilizes token-level confidence in the model's final answers as a proxy for reward.<n>We show that CRew outperforms existing training-free reward approaches on the MATH500 and RewardMATH benchmarks.<n>We propose CRew-DPO, a training strategy that constructs preference data from confidence scores combined with correctness signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T12:51:47Z)
• CoMAS: Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Interaction Rewards [80.78748457530718]
  Self-evolution is a central research topic in enabling large language model (LLM)-based agents to continually improve their capabilities after pretraining.<n>We introduce Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems (CoMAS), a novel framework that enables agents to improve autonomously by learning from inter-agent interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:50:26Z)
• RL-PLUS: Countering Capability Boundary Collapse of LLMs in Reinforcement Learning with Hybrid-policy Optimization [86.30192066451256]
  We propose RL-PLUS, a novel hybrid-policy optimization approach for Large Language Models (LLMs)<n> RL-PLUS synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities and surpass the boundaries of base models.<n>We provide both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T23:55:29Z)
• Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback [3.73824942136665]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce plausible but poorly-calibrated answers.<n>We present Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback (RLSF), a post-training stage that uses the model's own confidence as an intrinsic reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T15:46:26Z)
• Omni-Thinker: Scaling Cross-Domain Generalization in LLMs via Multi-Task RL with Hybrid Rewards [50.21528417884747]
  We introduce Omni-Thinker, a unified reinforcement learning framework that enhances large language models (LLMs) performance across diverse tasks.<n>Our approach enables consistent optimization across task types and scales RL-based training to subjective domains.<n> Experimental results across four domains reveal that curriculum learning improves performance by 5.2% over joint training and 9.1% over model merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T01:50:16Z)
• MeRF: Motivation-enhanced Reinforcement Finetuning for Large Reasoning Models [95.6332110724999]
  Motivation-enhanced Reinforcement Finetuning (MeRF) is an intuitive yet effective method enhancing reinforcement learning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>MeRF directly injects the reward specification into the prompt, which serves as an in-context motivation for model to improve its responses with awareness of the optimization objective.<n> Empirical evaluations on the Knights and Knaves(K&K) logic puzzle reasoning benchmark demonstrate that textttMeRF achieves substantial performance gains over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T10:37:57Z)
• CC-LEARN: Cohort-based Consistency Learning [5.7716971260066]
  Large language models struggle with consistent, robust reasoning.<n>We introduce cohort-based Consistency Learning (CC-Learn)<n>Experiments show that CC-Learn boosts both accuracy and reasoning stability over pretrained and SFT baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:41:28Z)
• Crowd-SFT: Crowdsourcing for LLM Alignment [4.648677931378919]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)<n>We propose an open, crowd-sourced fine-tuning framework that enables broader feedback collection for SFT without extensive annotator training.<n>Our framework promotes incentive fairness via a point-based reward system correlated with Shapley values and guides model convergence through iterative model updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T15:26:38Z)
• On the Diminishing Returns of Complex Robust RAG Training in the Era of Powerful LLMs [85.688901949146]
  We investigate the question: does the benefit of complex robust training methods diminish as language models become more powerful?<n>Our analysis reveals a consistent trend: emphthe marginal robustness benefit of sophisticated training strategies decreases substantially as model capacity increases.<n>Further investigation demonstrates that stronger models naturally exhibit better confidence calibration, cross-dataset generalization capability, and more effective attention patterns, even under simple training regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:34:31Z)
• MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Training [66.9481561915524]
  MALT (Multi-Agent LLM Training) is a novel post-training strategy that divides the reasoning process into generation, verification, and refinement steps.<n>On MATH, GSM8K, and CSQA, MALT surpasses the same baseline LLM with a relative improvement of 15.66%, 7.42%, and 9.40% respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T19:30:36Z)
• On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
  Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks. We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly. In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z)
• Confidence Calibration and Rationalization for LLMs via Multi-Agent Deliberation [18.815226646364476]
  Existing calibration methods for large language models (LLMs) focus on estimating or eliciting individual confidence without taking full advantage of the "Collective Wisdom" We propose Collaborative, a post-hoc training-free calibration strategy that leverages the collaborative and expressive capabilities of multiple tool-augmented LLM agents in a simulated group deliberation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-14T02:40:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.