A Large-Scale Web Search Dataset for Federated Online Learning to Rank
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12353v1
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 12:57:54 GMT
- Title: A Large-Scale Web Search Dataset for Federated Online Learning to Rank
- Abstract summary: We present a large-scale web search dataset with 2.6 million queries from 10,000 users.<n>Our dataset addresses key limitations of existing benchmarks by including user identifiers, real click data, and query timestamps.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The centralized collection of search interaction logs for training ranking models raises significant privacy concerns. Federated Online Learning to Rank (FOLTR) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by enabling collaborative model training without sharing raw user data. However, benchmarks in FOLTR are largely based on random partitioning of classical learning-to-rank datasets, simulated user clicks, and the assumption of synchronous client participation. This oversimplifies real-world dynamics and undermines the realism of experimental results. We present AOL4FOLTR, a large-scale web search dataset with 2.6 million queries from 10,000 users. Our dataset addresses key limitations of existing benchmarks by including user identifiers, real click data, and query timestamps, enabling realistic user partitioning, behavior modeling, and asynchronous federated learning scenarios.
Related papers
- Fed-REACT: Federated Representation Learning for Heterogeneous and Evolving Data [19.33095080645165]
Fed-REACT is a federated learning framework designed for heterogeneous and evolving client data.<n>We provide a theoretical analysis of the representation learning stage, and empirically demonstrate that Fed-REACT achieves superior accuracy and robustness on real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T20:24:40Z) - Effective and secure federated online learning to rank [5.874142059884521]
Online Learning to Rank optimises ranking models using implicit user feedback, such as clicks.<n>It addresses several drawbacks such as the high cost of human annotations, potential misalignment between user preferences and human judgements, and the rapid changes in user query intents.<n>This thesis presents a comprehensive study on Federated Online Learning to Rank, addressing its effectiveness, robustness, security, and unlearning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-26T05:53:10Z) - Accelerating Large Language Model Pretraining via LFR Pedagogy: Learn, Focus, and Review [50.78587571704713]
Learn-Focus-Review (LFR) is a dynamic training approach that adapts to the model's learning progress.<n>LFR tracks the model's learning performance across data blocks (sequences of tokens) and prioritizes revisiting challenging regions of the dataset.<n>Compared to baseline models trained on the full datasets, LFR consistently achieved lower perplexity and higher accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T00:59:18Z) - Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlations [56.41097718862742]
We present a framework that selects high-quality pretraining data without any LLM training of our own.<n>We build a new statistical framework for data selection centered around estimates of perplexity-benchmark correlations.<n>Our approach outperforms DSIR on every benchmark, while matching the best data selector found in DataComp-LM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-09T17:23:29Z) - Replica Tree-based Federated Learning using Limited Data [6.572149681197959]
In this work, we propose a novel federated learning framework, named RepTreeFL.
At the core of the solution is the concept of a replica, where we replicate each participating client by copying its model architecture and perturbing its local data distribution.
Our approach enables learning from limited data and a small number of clients by aggregating a larger number of models with diverse data distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-28T17:47:25Z) - FedSampling: A Better Sampling Strategy for Federated Learning [81.85411484302952]
Federated learning (FL) is an important technique for learning models from decentralized data in a privacy-preserving way.
Existing FL methods usually uniformly sample clients for local model learning in each round.
We propose a novel data uniform sampling strategy for federated learning (FedSampling)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-25T13:38:51Z) - Scalable Collaborative Learning via Representation Sharing [53.047460465980144]
Federated learning (FL) and Split Learning (SL) are two frameworks that enable collaborative learning while keeping the data private (on device)
In FL, each data holder trains a model locally and releases it to a central server for aggregation.
In SL, the clients must release individual cut-layer activations (smashed data) to the server and wait for its response (during both inference and back propagation).
In this work, we present a novel approach for privacy-preserving machine learning, where the clients collaborate via online knowledge distillation using a contrastive loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-20T10:49:22Z) - FLIS: Clustered Federated Learning via Inference Similarity for Non-IID
Data Distribution [7.924081556869144]
We present a new algorithm, FLIS, which groups the clients population in clusters with jointly trainable data distributions.
We present experimental results to demonstrate the benefits of FLIS over the state-of-the-art benchmarks on CIFAR-100/10, SVHN, and FMNIST datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-20T22:10:48Z) - Straggler-Resilient Personalized Federated Learning [55.54344312542944]
Federated learning allows training models from samples distributed across a large network of clients while respecting privacy and communication restrictions.
We develop a novel algorithmic procedure with theoretical speedup guarantees that simultaneously handles two of these hurdles.
Our method relies on ideas from representation learning theory to find a global common representation using all clients' data and learn a user-specific set of parameters leading to a personalized solution for each client.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-05T01:14:46Z) - IFedAvg: Interpretable Data-Interoperability for Federated Learning [39.388223565330385]
In this work, we define and address low interoperability induced by underlying client data inconsistencies in federated learning for tabular data.
The proposed method, iFedAvg, builds on federated averaging adding local element-wise affine layers to allow for a personalized and granular understanding of the collaborative learning process.
We evaluate iFedAvg using several public benchmarks and a collection of real-world datasets from the 2014 - 2016 West African Ebola epidemic, jointly forming the largest such dataset in the world.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-14T09:54:00Z) - Straggler-Resilient Federated Learning: Leveraging the Interplay Between
Statistical Accuracy and System Heterogeneity [57.275753974812666]
Federated learning involves learning from data samples distributed across a network of clients while the data remains local.
In this paper, we propose a novel straggler-resilient federated learning method that incorporates statistical characteristics of the clients' data to adaptively select the clients in order to speed up the learning procedure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-28T19:21:14Z) - Multi-Center Federated Learning [62.57229809407692]
This paper proposes a novel multi-center aggregation mechanism for federated learning.
It learns multiple global models from the non-IID user data and simultaneously derives the optimal matching between users and centers.
Our experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method outperforms several popular federated learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-03T09:14:31Z) - Overcoming Noisy and Irrelevant Data in Federated Learning [13.963024590508038]
Federated learning is an effective way of training a machine learning model in a distributed manner from local data collected by client devices.
We propose a method for distributedly selecting relevant data, where we use a benchmark model trained on a small benchmark dataset.
The effectiveness of our proposed approach is evaluated on multiple real-world image datasets in a simulated system with a large number of clients.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-22T22:28:47Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.