Systematic Analysis of MCP Security

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.12538v1
• Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:23:41 GMT
• Title: Systematic Analysis of MCP Security
• Authors: Yongjian Guo, Puzhuo Liu, Wanlun Ma, Zehang Deng, Xiaogang Zhu, Peng Di, Xi Xiao, Sheng Wen,
• Abstract summary: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a universal standard that enables AI agents to seamlessly connect with external tools.<n> MCP introduces significant vulnerabilities, such as Tool Poisoning Attacks (TPA), where hidden malicious instructions exploit the sycophancy of large language models.<n>We present the MCP Attack Library (MCPLIB), which categorizes and implements 31 distinct attack methods under four key classifications.
• Score: 13.801464032236481
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a universal standard that enables AI agents to seamlessly connect with external tools, significantly enhancing their functionality. However, while MCP brings notable benefits, it also introduces significant vulnerabilities, such as Tool Poisoning Attacks (TPA), where hidden malicious instructions exploit the sycophancy of large language models (LLMs) to manipulate agent behavior. Despite these risks, current academic research on MCP security remains limited, with most studies focusing on narrow or qualitative analyses that fail to capture the diversity of real-world threats. To address this gap, we present the MCP Attack Library (MCPLIB), which categorizes and implements 31 distinct attack methods under four key classifications: direct tool injection, indirect tool injection, malicious user attacks, and LLM inherent attack. We further conduct a quantitative analysis of the efficacy of each attack. Our experiments reveal key insights into MCP vulnerabilities, including agents' blind reliance on tool descriptions, sensitivity to file-based attacks, chain attacks exploiting shared context, and difficulty distinguishing external data from executable commands. These insights, validated through attack experiments, underscore the urgency for robust defense strategies and informed MCP design. Our contributions include 1) constructing a comprehensive MCP attack taxonomy, 2) introducing a unified attack framework MCPLIB, and 3) conducting empirical vulnerability analysis to enhance MCP security mechanisms. This work provides a foundational framework, supporting the secure evolution of MCP ecosystems.

Related papers

• Prompt Injection Attacks on Agentic Coding Assistants: A Systematic Analysis of Vulnerabilities in Skills, Tools, and Protocol Ecosystems [0.0]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of prompt injection attacks targeting agentic coding assistants.<n>Our meta-analysis synthesizes findings from 78 recent studies.<n>Our findings indicate that the security community must treat prompt injection as a first-class vulnerability class.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T18:39:21Z)
• An Empirical Study on the Security Vulnerabilities of GPTs [48.12756684275687]
  GPTs are one kind of customized AI agents based on OpenAI's large language models.<n>We present an empirical study on the security vulnerabilities of GPTs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T13:30:25Z)
• MCPGuard : Automatically Detecting Vulnerabilities in MCP Servers [16.620755774987774]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a standardized interface enabling seamless integration between Large Language Models (LLMs) and external data sources and tools.<n>This paper systematically analyzes the security landscape of MCP-based systems, identifying three principal threat categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T05:12:51Z)
• Cuckoo Attack: Stealthy and Persistent Attacks Against AI-IDE [64.47951172662745]
  Cuckoo Attack is a novel attack that achieves stealthy and persistent command execution by embedding malicious payloads into configuration files.<n>We formalize our attack paradigm into two stages, including initial infection and persistence.<n>We contribute seven actionable checkpoints for vendors to evaluate their product security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T04:10:52Z)
• Mind Your Server: A Systematic Study of Parasitic Toolchain Attacks on the MCP Ecosystem [13.95558554298296]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated with external systems through the Model Context Protocol (MCP)<n>In this paper, we reveal a new class of attacks, Parasitic Toolchain Attacks, instantiated as MCP Unintended Privacy Disclosure (MCP-UPD)<n>The malicious logic infiltrates the toolchain and unfolds in three phases: Parasitic Ingestion, Privacy Collection, and Privacy Disclosure, culminating in stealthy exfiltration of private data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T11:35:32Z)
• Servant, Stalker, Predator: How An Honest, Helpful, And Harmless (3H) Agent Unlocks Adversarial Skills [3.0620527758972496]
  This paper identifies and analyzes a novel vulnerability class in Model Context Protocol based agent systems.<n>The attack chain describes and demonstrates how benign, individually authorized tasks can be orchestrated to produce harmful emergent behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T01:11:59Z)
• MCPSecBench: A Systematic Security Benchmark and Playground for Testing Model Context Protocols [7.10162765778832]
  We present the first systematic taxonomy of MCP security, identifying 17 attack types across 4 primary attack surfaces.<n>We introduce MCPSecBench, a comprehensive security benchmark and playground that integrates prompt datasets, MCP servers, MCP clients, attack scripts, and protection mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T11:49:16Z)
• Attractive Metadata Attack: Inducing LLM Agents to Invoke Malicious Tools [10.086284534400658]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning and decision-making by leveraging external tools.<n>We identify this as a new and stealthy threat surface that allows malicious tools to be preferentially selected by LLM agents.<n>We propose a black-box in-context learning framework that generates highly attractive but syntactically and semantically valid tool metadata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:38:59Z)
• Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms [1.03121181235382]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents face security vulnerabilities spanning AI-specific and traditional software domains.<n>This study bridges this gap through comparative evaluation of Function Calling architecture and Model Context Protocol (MCP) deployment paradigms.<n>We tested 3,250 attack scenarios across seven language models, evaluating simple, composed, and chained attacks targeting both AI-specific threats and software vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T18:24:28Z)
• A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models [55.60375624503877]
  Model extraction attacks pose significant security threats to deployed language models.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive taxonomy of extraction attacks and defenses, categorizing attacks into functionality extraction, training data extraction, and prompt-targeted attacks.<n>We examine defense mechanisms organized into model protection, data privacy protection, and prompt-targeted strategies, evaluating their effectiveness across different deployment scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T22:02:01Z)
• We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems [48.345884334050965]
  We advocate the research community in LLM safety to pay close attention to the new safety risks issues introduced by MCP.<n>We conduct a series of pilot experiments to demonstrate the safety risks in MCP-powered agent systems is a real threat and its defense is not trivial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T16:24:31Z)
• Beyond the Protocol: Unveiling Attack Vectors in the Model Context Protocol Ecosystem [9.147044310206773]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an emerging standard designed to enable seamless interaction between Large Language Model (LLM) applications and external tools or resources.<n>In this paper, we present the first systematic study of attack vectors targeting the MCP ecosystem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-31T08:01:11Z)
• MCIP: Protecting MCP Safety via Model Contextual Integrity Protocol [47.98229326363512]
  This paper proposes a novel framework to enhance Model Context Protocol safety.<n>Based on the MAESTRO framework, we first analyze the missing safety mechanisms in MCP.<n>Next, we develop a fine-grained taxonomy that captures a diverse range of unsafe behaviors observed in MCP scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:41:45Z)
• AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents [54.29555239363013]
  We propose a generic black-box fuzzing framework, AgentVigil, to automatically discover and exploit indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities.<n>We evaluate AgentVigil on two public benchmarks, AgentDojo and VWA-adv, where it achieves 71% and 70% success rates against agents based on o3-mini and GPT-4o.<n>We apply our attacks in real-world environments, successfully misleading agents to navigate to arbitrary URLs, including malicious sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:40:17Z)
• MCP Guardian: A Security-First Layer for Safeguarding MCP-Based AI System [0.0]
  We present MCP Guardian, a framework that strengthens MCP-based communication with authentication, rate-limiting, logging, tracing, and Web Application Firewall (WAF) scanning.<n>Our approach fosters secure, scalable data access for AI assistants, underscoring the importance of a defense-in-depth approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T08:49:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.