Toward an African Agenda for AI Safety

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13179v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:42:09 GMT
• Title: Toward an African Agenda for AI Safety
• Abstract summary: This paper maps Africa's distinctive AI risk profile, from deepfake fuelled electoral interference and data colonial dependency to compute scarcity, labour disruption and disproportionate exposure to climate driven environmental costs.<n>We propose a five-point action plan that foregrounds the protection of the human rights of those most vulnerable to experiencing the harmful socio-economic effects of AI.
• Score: 1.5614394853621925
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper maps Africa's distinctive AI risk profile, from deepfake fuelled electoral interference and data colonial dependency to compute scarcity, labour disruption and disproportionate exposure to climate driven environmental costs. While major benefits are promised to accrue, the availability, development and adoption of AI also mean that African people and countries face particular AI safety risks, from large scale labour market disruptions to the nefarious use of AI to manipulate public opinion. To date, African perspectives have not been meaningfully integrated into global debates and processes regarding AI safety, leaving African stakeholders with limited influence over the emerging global AI safety governance agenda. While there are Computer Incident Response Teams on the continent, none hosts a dedicated AI Safety Institute or office. We propose a five-point action plan centred on (i) a policy approach that foregrounds the protection of the human rights of those most vulnerable to experiencing the harmful socio-economic effects of AI; (ii) the establishment of an African AI Safety Institute; (iii) promote public AI literacy and awareness; (iv) development of early warning system with inclusive benchmark suites for 25+ African languages; and (v) an annual AU-level AI Safety & Security Forum.

Related papers

• Intelligent Cause Prioritisation? An Analysis of AI Policy Priorities and Governance in Africa [0.0]
  Africa is largely a consumer rather than a producer of frontier AI systems.<n>Governments across Africa are eager to embrace AI as a means for accelerating economic transformation.<n>This essay argues that while African governments are highly attentive to AI's opportunities, they devote comparatively little attention to AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T19:16:39Z)
• Take the Train: Africa at the Crossroad of Modern AI [1.1417805445492082]
  Africa's participation in modern AI development is constrained by severe infrastructural and policy gaps.<n>This paper offers evidence that sustainable AI adoption requires robust digital foundations through balanced access to compute, data, and the energy that makes it possible.<n>We introduce the textitAfrica AI Compute Tracker (ACT), an interactive map to monitor the availability of AI-ready HPC systems throughout the continent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T10:40:10Z)
• Assessing the Case for Africa-Centric AI Safety Evaluations [0.0]
  We develop a taxonomy for identifying Africa-centric severe AI risks.<n>We propose threat modelling strategies for African contexts.<n>We offer practical guidance for running evaluations under resource constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T13:04:52Z)
• "We are not Future-ready": Understanding AI Privacy Risks and Existing Mitigation Strategies from the Perspective of AI Developers in Europe [56.1653658714305]
  We interviewed 25 AI developers based in Europe to understand which privacy threats they believe pose the greatest risk to users, developers, and businesses.<n>We find that there is little consensus among AI developers on the relative ranking of privacy risks.<n>While AI developers are aware of proposed mitigation strategies for addressing these risks, they reported minimal real-world adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T13:51:33Z)
• The Singapore Consensus on Global AI Safety Research Priorities [128.58674892183657]
  "2025 Singapore Conference on AI (SCAI): International Scientific Exchange on AI Safety" aimed to support research in this space.<n>Report builds on the International AI Safety Report chaired by Yoshua Bengio and backed by 33 governments.<n>Report organises AI safety research domains into three types: challenges with creating trustworthy AI systems (Development), challenges with evaluating their risks (Assessment) and challenges with monitoring and intervening after deployment (Control)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T17:59:50Z)
• AI threats to national security can be countered through an incident regime [55.2480439325792]
  We propose a legally mandated post-deployment AI incident regime that aims to counter potential national security threats from AI systems.<n>Our proposed AI incident regime is split into three phases. The first phase revolves around a novel operationalization of what counts as an 'AI incident'<n>The second and third phases spell out that AI providers should notify a government agency about incidents, and that the government agency should be involved in amending AI providers' security and safety procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T17:51:50Z)
• Position: Mind the Gap-the Growing Disconnect Between Established Vulnerability Disclosure and AI Security [56.219994752894294]
  We argue that adapting existing processes for AI security reporting is doomed to fail due to fundamental shortcomings for the distinctive characteristics of AI systems.<n>Based on our proposal to address these shortcomings, we discuss an approach to AI security reporting and how the new AI paradigm, AI agents, will further reinforce the need for specialized AI security incident reporting advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:50:26Z)
• AI-Powered Autonomous Weapons Risk Geopolitical Instability and Threaten AI Research [6.96356867602455]
  We argue that the recent embrace of machine learning in the development of autonomous weapons systems (AWS) creates serious risks to geopolitical stability and the free exchange of ideas in AI research. ML is already enabling the substitution of AWS for human soldiers in many battlefield roles, reducing the upfront human cost, and thus political cost, of waging offensive war. Further, the military value of AWS raises the specter of an AI-powered arms race and the misguided imposition of national security restrictions on AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T05:19:45Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Case Studies of AI Policy Development in Africa [1.3194391758295114]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) requires new ways of evaluating national technology use and strategy for African nations. We conclude that existing global readiness assessments do not fully capture African states' progress in AI readiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T19:17:11Z)
• Empowering Africa: An In-depth Exploration of the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Across the Continent [0.0]
  The study considers regional nuances, cultural factors, and infrastructural constraints shaping the deployment of AI solutions in Africa. Case studies in healthcare, agriculture, finance, and education highlight AI's transformative potential for efficiency, accessibility, and inclusivity. Ethical considerations, including data privacy and algorithmic bias, are addressed alongside policy frameworks supporting responsible AI implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T12:07:13Z)
• Taking control: Policies to address extinction risks from AI [0.0]
  We argue that voluntary commitments from AI companies would be an inappropriate and insufficient response. We describe three policy proposals that would meaningfully address the threats from advanced AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T15:53:14Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.