Intelligent Cause Prioritisation? An Analysis of AI Policy Priorities and Governance in Africa

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18459v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:16:39 GMT
• Title: Intelligent Cause Prioritisation? An Analysis of AI Policy Priorities and Governance in Africa
• Abstract summary: Africa is largely a consumer rather than a producer of frontier AI systems.<n>Governments across Africa are eager to embrace AI as a means for accelerating economic transformation.<n>This essay argues that while African governments are highly attentive to AI's opportunities, they devote comparatively little attention to AI safety.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The rapid improvement of AI systems has intensified debate about humanity's economic, political, social, and existential future. As AI reshapes expectations about what lies ahead, policy choices and institutional responses will play a crucial role in determining who benefits, who bears the costs, and whether the most serious risks can be mitigated. Africa remains relatively overlooked in these discussions, partly because it is largely a consumer rather than a producer of frontier AI systems, and also because many countries on the continent continue to face pressing development challenges. Given the catch-up imperative, governments across Africa are eager to embrace AI as a means for accelerating economic transformation. Drawing on speeches, press releases, public statements, and national AI strategies/frameworks, this essay argues that while African governments are highly attentive to AI's opportunities, they devote comparatively little attention to AI safety.

Related papers

• Toward an African Agenda for AI Safety [1.5614394853621925]
  This paper maps Africa's distinctive AI risk profile, from deepfake fuelled electoral interference and data colonial dependency to compute scarcity, labour disruption and disproportionate exposure to climate driven environmental costs.<n>We propose a five-point action plan that foregrounds the protection of the human rights of those most vulnerable to experiencing the harmful socio-economic effects of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T17:42:09Z)
• Advancing Science- and Evidence-based AI Policy [163.43609502905707]
  This paper tackles the problem of how to optimize the relationship between evidence and policy to address the opportunities and challenges of AI.<n>An increasing number of efforts address this problem by often either (i) contributing research into the risks of AI and their effective mitigation or (ii) advocating for policy to address these risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T23:20:58Z)
• The California Report on Frontier AI Policy [110.35302787349856]
  Continued progress in frontier AI carries the potential for profound advances in scientific discovery, economic productivity, and broader social well-being.<n>As the epicenter of global AI innovation, California has a unique opportunity to continue supporting developments in frontier AI.<n>Report derives policy principles that can inform how California approaches the use, assessment, and governance of frontier AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T23:33:21Z)
• AI Governance to Avoid Extinction: The Strategic Landscape and Actionable Research Questions [2.07180164747172]
  Humanity appears to be on course to soon develop AI systems that substantially outperform human experts.<n>We believe the default trajectory has a high likelihood of catastrophe, including human extinction.<n>Risks come from failure to control powerful AI systems, misuse of AI by malicious rogue actors, war between great powers, and authoritarian lock-in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T17:35:36Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences.<n>First, it is not sustainable, as, despite efficiency improvements, its compute demands increase faster than model performance.<n>Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Societal Adaptation to Advanced AI [1.2607853680700076]
  Existing strategies for managing risks from advanced AI systems often focus on affecting what AI systems are developed and how they diffuse.<n>We urge a complementary approach: increasing societal adaptation to advanced AI.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework which helps identify adaptive interventions that avoid, defend against and remedy potentially harmful uses of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:52:12Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• AI Governance and Ethics Framework for Sustainable AI and Sustainability [0.0]
  There are many emerging AI risks for humanity, such as autonomous weapons, automation-spurred job loss, socio-economic inequality, bias caused by data and algorithms, privacy violations and deepfakes. Social diversity, equity and inclusion are considered key success factors of AI to mitigate risks, create values and drive social justice. In our journey towards an AI-enabled sustainable future, we need to address AI ethics and governance as a priority.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T22:23:10Z)
• AI Ethics Needs Good Data [0.8701566919381224]
  We argue that discourse on AI must transcend the language of 'ethics' and engage with power and political economy. We offer four 'economys' on which Good Data AI can be built: community, rights, usability and politics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-15T04:16:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.