MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13186v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 13:46:47 GMT
• Title: MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents
• Abstract summary: MM-BrowseComp is a novel benchmark comprising 224 challenging, hand-crafted questions.<n>These questions often incorporate images in prompts, and crucial information encountered during the search and reasoning process may also be embedded within images or videos on webpages.<n>Our comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art models on MM-BrowseComp reveals that even top models like OpenAI o3 with tools achieve only 29.02% accuracy.
• Score: 78.3863007028688
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: AI agents with advanced reasoning and tool use capabilities have demonstrated impressive performance in web browsing for deep search. While existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp evaluate these browsing abilities, they primarily focus on textual information, overlooking the prevalence of multimodal content. To bridge this gap, we introduce MM-BrowseComp, a novel benchmark comprising 224 challenging, hand-crafted questions specifically designed to assess agents' multimodal retrieval and reasoning capabilities. These questions often incorporate images in prompts, and crucial information encountered during the search and reasoning process may also be embedded within images or videos on webpages. Consequently, methods relying solely on text prove insufficient for our benchmark. Additionally, we provide a verified checklist for each question, enabling fine-grained analysis of multimodal dependencies and reasoning paths. Our comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art models on MM-BrowseComp reveals that even top models like OpenAI o3 with tools achieve only 29.02\% accuracy, highlighting the suboptimal multimodal capabilities and lack of native multimodal reasoning in current models.

Related papers

• Do Composed Image Retrieval Benchmarks Require Multimodal Composition? [86.99911649534795]
  We show that strong performance on Composed Image Retrieval benchmarks is assumed to require multimodal composition.<n>Across four widely used CIR benchmarks and eleven Generalist Multimodal Embedding models, a large fraction of queries can be solved using a single modality.<n>High CIR performance can arise from unimodal signals rather than true multimodal composition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T12:56:36Z)
• Towards Long-horizon Agentic Multimodal Search [109.0092257657625]
  We propose a novel Long-horizon MultiModal deep search framework, named LMM-Searcher, centered on a file-based visual representation mechanism.<n>We equip the agent with a tailored fetch-image tool, enabling a progressive, on-demand visual loading strategy for active perception.<n>Our method successfully scales to 100-turn search horizons, achieving state-of-the-art performance among open-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T15:40:28Z)
• MTA-Agent: An Open Recipe for Multimodal Deep Search Agents [51.180338423927985]
  Multi-hop large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in visual understanding, yet they remain limited in complex, multi-step reasoning.<n>We propose a Multi-hop Tool-Augmented Agent for Evidence-based QA Synthesis (MTA-Agent)<n>MTA-Agent automatically selects tools and their parameters to retrieve and validate evidence from both visual and textual sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T19:01:45Z)
• VisBrowse-Bench: Benchmarking Visual-Native Search for Multimodal Browsing Agents [27.574370658412864]
  We introduce a new benchmark for visual-native search, VisBrowse-Bench.<n>It contains 169 VQA instances covering multiple domains.<n>It evaluates the models' visual reasoning capabilities during the search process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T09:24:13Z)
• BrowseComp-$V^3$: A Visual, Vertical, and Verifiable Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agents [30.849897676091327]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are evolving into autonomous agents capable of performing multimodal web browsing and deep search in open-world environments.<n>We introduce BrowseComp-$V3$, a novel benchmark consisting of 300 carefully curated and challenging questions spanning diverse domains.<n>Our results highlight a fundamental gap between current model capabilities and robust multimodal deep search in real-world settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T12:25:13Z)
• MAVIS: A Benchmark for Multimodal Source Attribution in Long-form Visual Question Answering [44.41273615523289]
  We introduce MAVIS, the first benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal source attribution systems.<n>Our dataset comprises 157K visual QA instances, where each answer is annotated with fact-level citations referring to multimodal documents.<n>We develop fine-grained automatic metrics along three dimensions of informativeness, groundedness, and fluency, and demonstrate their strong correlation with human judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T10:14:59Z)
• UNIDOC-BENCH: A Unified Benchmark for Document-Centric Multimodal RAG [82.84014669683863]
  Multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (MM-RAG) is a key approach for applying large language models to real-world knowledge bases.<n>UniDoc-Bench is the first large-scale, realistic benchmark for MM-RAG built from 70k real-world PDF pages.<n>Our experiments show that multimodal text-image fusion RAG systems consistently outperform both unimodal and jointly multimodal embedding-based retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T04:30:13Z)
• MR$^2$-Bench: Going Beyond Matching to Reasoning in Multimodal Retrieval [86.35779264575154]
  Multimodal retrieval is becoming a crucial component of modern AI applications, yet its evaluation lags behind the demands of more realistic and challenging scenarios.<n>We introduce MR$2$-Bench, a reasoning-intensive benchmark for multimodal retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T15:09:14Z)
• MMSearch-Plus: Benchmarking Provenance-Aware Search for Multimodal Browsing Agents [44.63565009665076]
  We introduce MMSearch-Plus, a 311-task benchmark that enforces multimodal understanding.<n>We provide a model-agnostic agent framework with standard browsing tools and a set-of-mark (SoM) module.<n>SoM enables provenance-aware zoom-and-retrieve and improves robustness in multi-step reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T09:58:27Z)
• Agent-X: Evaluating Deep Multimodal Reasoning in Vision-Centric Agentic Tasks [94.19506319646376]
  We introduce Agent-X, a benchmark for evaluating vision-centric agents in real-world, multimodal settings.<n>Agent-X features 828 agentic tasks with authentic visual contexts, including images, multi-image comparisons, videos, and instructional text.<n>Our results reveal that even the best-performing models, including GPT, Gemini, and Qwen families, struggle to solve multi-step vision tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T17:59:53Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Multimomal Generation for Document Question Answering [42.468210353582755]
  Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) faces dual challenges in processing lengthy multimodal documents.<n>Current document retrieval-augmented generation (DocRAG) methods remain limited by their text-centric approaches.<n>We introduce MMDocRAG, a comprehensive benchmark featuring 4,055 expert-annotated QA pairs with multi-page, cross-modal evidence chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:52:57Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal Contexts [56.7225771305861]
  This paper introduces Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (M$2$RAG), a benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Multi-modal Large Language Models.<n>The benchmark comprises four tasks: image captioning, multi-modal question answering, multi-modal fact verification, and image reranking.<n>To enhance the context utilization capabilities of MLLMs, we also introduce Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Instruction Tuning (MM-RAIT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T16:25:25Z)
• Multi-modal Retrieval Augmented Multi-modal Generation: Datasets, Evaluation Metrics and Strong Baselines [63.22096609916707]
  Multi-modal Retrieval Augmented Multi-modal Generation (M$2$RAG) is a novel task that enables foundation models to process multi-modal web content.<n>Despite its potential impact, M$2$RAG remains understudied, lacking comprehensive analysis and high-quality data resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T13:20:19Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• WebQuest: A Benchmark for Multimodal QA on Web Page Sequences [10.008284460456107]
  WebQuest is a multi-page question-answering dataset that requires reasoning across multiple web pages. Our dataset evaluates information extraction, multimodal retrieval and composition of information from many web pages. We evaluate leading proprietary multimodal models like GPT-4V, Gemini Flash, Claude 3, and open source models like InstructBLIP, PaliGemma on our dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T18:44:25Z)
• An Interactive Multi-modal Query Answering System with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [21.892975397847316]
  We present an interactive Multi-modal Query Answering (MQA) system, empowered by our newly developed multi-modal retrieval framework and navigation graph index. One notable aspect of MQA is its utilization of contrastive learning to assess the significance of different modalities. The system achieves efficient retrieval through our advanced navigation graph index, refined using computational pruning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T02:01:49Z)
• Read, Look or Listen? What's Needed for Solving a Multimodal Dataset [7.0430001782867]
  We propose a two-step method to analyze multimodal datasets, which leverages a small seed of human annotation to map each multimodal instance to the modalities required to process it. We apply our approach to TVQA, a video question-answering dataset, and discover that most questions can be answered using a single modality, without a substantial bias towards any specific modality. We analyze the MERLOT Reserve, finding that it struggles with image-based questions compared to text and audio, but also with auditory speaker identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T08:02:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.