Virtuous Machines: Towards Artificial General Science
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13421v1
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:35:56 GMT
- Title: Virtuous Machines: Towards Artificial General Science
- Authors: Gabrielle Wehr, Reuben Rideaux, Amaya J. Fox, David R. Lightfoot, Jason Tangen, Jason B. Mattingley, Shane E. Ehrhardt,
- Abstract summary: We show that a domain-agnostic, agentic AI system can independently navigate the scientific workflow.<n>The system autonomously designed and executed three psychological studies on visual working memory, mental rotation, and imagery vividness.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence systems are transforming scientific discovery by accelerating specific research tasks, from protein structure prediction to materials design, yet remain confined to narrow domains requiring substantial human oversight. The exponential growth of scientific literature and increasing domain specialisation constrain researchers' capacity to synthesise knowledge across disciplines and develop unifying theories, motivating exploration of more general-purpose AI systems for science. Here we show that a domain-agnostic, agentic AI system can independently navigate the scientific workflow - from hypothesis generation through data collection to manuscript preparation. The system autonomously designed and executed three psychological studies on visual working memory, mental rotation, and imagery vividness, executed one new online data collection with 288 participants, developed analysis pipelines through 8-hour+ continuous coding sessions, and produced completed manuscripts. The results demonstrate the capability of AI scientific discovery pipelines to conduct non-trivial research with theoretical reasoning and methodological rigour comparable to experienced researchers, though with limitations in conceptual nuance and theoretical interpretation. This is a step toward embodied AI that can test hypotheses through real-world experiments, accelerating discovery by autonomously exploring regions of scientific space that human cognitive and resource constraints might otherwise leave unexplored. It raises important questions about the nature of scientific understanding and the attribution of scientific credit.
Related papers
- AI4X Roadmap: Artificial Intelligence for the advancement of scientific pursuit and its future directions [65.44445343399126]
We look at AI-enabled science across biology, chemistry, climate science, mathematics, materials science, physics, self-driving laboratories and unconventional computing.<n>Several shared themes emerge: the need for diverse and trustworthy data, transferable electronic-structure and interatomic models, AI systems integrated into end-to-end scientific synthesis.<n>Across domains, we highlight how large foundation models, active learning and self-driving laboratories can close loops between prediction and validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-26T02:10:28Z) - OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists [47.41269933143946]
We introduce OmniScientist, a framework that encodes the underlying mechanisms of human research into the AI scientific workflow.<n> OmniScientist achieves end-to-end automation across data foundation, literature review, research ideation, experiment automation, scientific writing, and peer review.<n>This infrastructure empowers agents to not only comprehend and leverage human knowledge systems but also to collaborate and co-evolve.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-21T03:55:19Z) - Autonomous Agents for Scientific Discovery: Orchestrating Scientists, Language, Code, and Physics [82.55776608452017]
Large language models (LLMs) provide a flexible and versatile framework that orchestrates interactions with human scientists, natural language, computer language and code, and physics.<n>This paper presents our view and vision of LLM-based scientific agents and their growing role in transforming the scientific discovery lifecycle.<n>We identify open research challenges and outline promising directions for building more robust, generalizable, and adaptive scientific agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T22:26:26Z) - From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery [108.1082357960201]
Agentic AI shows capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, execution, analysis, and iterative refinement.<n>This survey provides a domain-oriented review of autonomous scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, materials science, and physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-18T05:25:54Z) - Position: Intelligent Science Laboratory Requires the Integration of Cognitive and Embodied AI [98.19195693735487]
We propose the paradigm of Intelligent Science Laboratories (ISLs)<n>ISLs are a multi-layered, closed-loop framework that deeply integrates cognitive and embodied intelligence.<n>We argue that such systems are essential for overcoming the current limitations of scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T13:31:44Z) - AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability [33.232300349142285]
The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Scientist represents a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>Recent AI Scientist studies demonstrate sufficient capabilities for independent scientific discovery.<n>Despite this substantial progress, AI Scientist has yet to produce a groundbreaking achievement in the domain of computer science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T06:59:10Z) - Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists [72.3420699173245]
An autonomous generalist scientist (AGS) concept combines agentic AI and embodied robotics to automate the entire research lifecycle.<n>AGS aims to significantly reduce the time and resources needed for scientific discovery.<n>As these autonomous systems become increasingly integrated into the research process, we hypothesize that scientific discovery might adhere to new scaling laws.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T14:00:27Z) - Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges [11.232704182001253]
This paper examines the current state of AI for scientific discovery, highlighting recent progress in large language models and other AI techniques applied to scientific tasks.<n>We then outline key challenges and promising research directions toward developing more comprehensive AI systems for scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T03:52:20Z) - The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop
Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole.
AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access.
Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.