OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16931v1
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 03:55:19 GMT
- Title: OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists
- Authors: Chenyang Shao, Dehao Huang, Yu Li, Keyu Zhao, Weiquan Lin, Yining Zhang, Qingbin Zeng, Zhiyu Chen, Tianxing Li, Yifei Huang, Taozhong Wu, Xinyang Liu, Ruotong Zhao, Mengsheng Zhao, Xuhua Zhang, Yue Wang, Yuanyi Zhen, Fengli Xu, Yong Li, Tie-Yan Liu,
- Abstract summary: We introduce OmniScientist, a framework that encodes the underlying mechanisms of human research into the AI scientific workflow.<n> OmniScientist achieves end-to-end automation across data foundation, literature review, research ideation, experiment automation, scientific writing, and peer review.<n>This infrastructure empowers agents to not only comprehend and leverage human knowledge systems but also to collaborate and co-evolve.
- Score: 47.41269933143946
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), AI agents have demonstrated increasing proficiency in scientific tasks, ranging from hypothesis generation and experimental design to manuscript writing. Such agent systems are commonly referred to as "AI Scientists." However, existing AI Scientists predominantly formulate scientific discovery as a standalone search or optimization problem, overlooking the fact that scientific research is inherently a social and collaborative endeavor. Real-world science relies on a complex scientific infrastructure composed of collaborative mechanisms, contribution attribution, peer review, and structured scientific knowledge networks. Due to the lack of modeling for these critical dimensions, current systems struggle to establish a genuine research ecosystem or interact deeply with the human scientific community. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniScientist, a framework that explicitly encodes the underlying mechanisms of human research into the AI scientific workflow. OmniScientist not only achieves end-to-end automation across data foundation, literature review, research ideation, experiment automation, scientific writing, and peer review, but also provides comprehensive infrastructural support by simulating the human scientific system, comprising: (1) a structured knowledge system built upon citation networks and conceptual correlations; (2) a collaborative research protocol (OSP), which enables seamless multi-agent collaboration and human researcher participation; and (3) an open evaluation platform (ScienceArena) based on blind pairwise user voting and Elo rankings. This infrastructure empowers agents to not only comprehend and leverage human knowledge systems but also to collaborate and co-evolve, fostering a sustainable and scalable innovation ecosystem.
Related papers
- Autonomous Agents for Scientific Discovery: Orchestrating Scientists, Language, Code, and Physics [82.55776608452017]
Large language models (LLMs) provide a flexible and versatile framework that orchestrates interactions with human scientists, natural language, computer language and code, and physics.<n>This paper presents our view and vision of LLM-based scientific agents and their growing role in transforming the scientific discovery lifecycle.<n>We identify open research challenges and outline promising directions for building more robust, generalizable, and adaptive scientific agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T22:26:26Z) - Virtuous Machines: Towards Artificial General Science [0.0]
We show that a domain-agnostic, agentic AI system can independently navigate the scientific workflow.<n>The system autonomously designed and executed three psychological studies on visual working memory, mental rotation, and imagery vividness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-19T00:35:56Z) - From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery [108.1082357960201]
Agentic AI shows capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, execution, analysis, and iterative refinement.<n>This survey provides a domain-oriented review of autonomous scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, materials science, and physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-18T05:25:54Z) - AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability [33.232300349142285]
The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Scientist represents a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>Recent AI Scientist studies demonstrate sufficient capabilities for independent scientific discovery.<n>Despite this substantial progress, AI Scientist has yet to produce a groundbreaking achievement in the domain of computer science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T06:59:10Z) - From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [67.07598263346591]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>This survey systematically charts this burgeoning field, placing a central focus on the changing roles and escalating capabilities of LLMs in science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-19T15:41:32Z) - Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists [72.3420699173245]
An autonomous generalist scientist (AGS) concept combines agentic AI and embodied robotics to automate the entire research lifecycle.<n>AGS aims to significantly reduce the time and resources needed for scientific discovery.<n>As these autonomous systems become increasingly integrated into the research process, we hypothesize that scientific discovery might adhere to new scaling laws.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T14:00:27Z) - Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges [11.232704182001253]
This paper examines the current state of AI for scientific discovery, highlighting recent progress in large language models and other AI techniques applied to scientific tasks.<n>We then outline key challenges and promising research directions toward developing more comprehensive AI systems for scientific discovery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-16T03:52:20Z) - Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [62.832818186789545]
Virtual Scientists (VirSci) is a multi-agent system designed to mimic the teamwork inherent in scientific research.<n>VirSci organizes a team of agents to collaboratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas.<n>We show that this multi-agent approach outperforms the state-of-the-art method in producing novel scientific ideas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-12T07:16:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.