Distributional Adversarial Attacks and Training in Deep Hedging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14757v2
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:50:22 GMT
• Title: Distributional Adversarial Attacks and Training in Deep Hedging
• Authors: Guangyi He, Tobias Sutter, Lukas Gonon,
• Abstract summary: We study the robustness of classical deep hedging strategies under distributional shifts.<n>We propose an adversarial training framework tailored to increase the robustness of deep hedging strategies.
• Score: 13.466955656693372
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we study the robustness of classical deep hedging strategies under distributional shifts by leveraging the concept of adversarial attacks. We first demonstrate that standard deep hedging models are highly vulnerable to small perturbations in the input distribution, resulting in significant performance degradation. Motivated by this, we propose an adversarial training framework tailored to increase the robustness of deep hedging strategies. Our approach extends pointwise adversarial attacks to the distributional setting and introduces a computationally tractable reformulation of the adversarial optimization problem over a Wasserstein ball. This enables the efficient training of hedging strategies that are resilient to distributional perturbations. Through extensive numerical experiments, we show that adversarially trained deep hedging strategies consistently outperform their classical counterparts in terms of out-of-sample performance and resilience to model misspecification. Additional results indicate that the robust strategies maintain reliable performance on real market data and remain effective during periods of market change. Our findings establish a practical and effective framework for robust deep hedging under realistic market uncertainties.

Related papers

• Learning to Hedge Swaptions [0.0]
  This paper investigates the deep hedging framework, based on reinforcement learning (RL), for the dynamic hedging of swaptions.<n>We design agents under three distinct objective functions to capture alternative risk preferences.<n>Our findings show that near-optimal hedging effectiveness is achieved when using two swaps as hedging instruments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-07T03:00:52Z)
• Exploiting Edge Features for Transferable Adversarial Attacks in Distributed Machine Learning [54.26807397329468]
  This work explores a previously overlooked vulnerability in distributed deep learning systems.<n>An adversary who intercepts the intermediate features transmitted between them can still pose a serious threat.<n>We propose an exploitation strategy specifically designed for distributed settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T20:09:00Z)
• Sampling-aware Adversarial Attacks Against Large Language Models [52.30089653615172]
  Existing adversarial attacks typically target harmful responses in single-point greedy generations.<n>We show that for the goal of eliciting harmful responses, repeated sampling of model outputs during the attack prompt optimization.<n>We show that integrating sampling into existing attacks boosts success rates by up to 37% and improves efficiency by up to two orders of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T16:13:33Z)
• Robust Optimization with Diffusion Models for Green Security [49.68562792424776]
  In green security, defenders must forecast adversarial behavior, such as poaching, illegal logging, and illegal fishing, to plan effective patrols.<n>We propose a conditional diffusion model for adversary behavior modeling, leveraging its strong distribution-fitting capabilities.<n>We introduce a mixed strategy of mixed strategies and employ a twisted Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampler for accurate sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T05:30:46Z)
• Adversarial Training in Low-Label Regimes with Margin-Based Interpolation [8.585017175426023]
  Adversarial training has emerged as an effective approach to train robust neural network models that are resistant to adversarial attacks.<n>In this paper, we introduce a novel semi-supervised adversarial training approach that enhances both robustness and natural accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T00:35:13Z)
• Enhancing Adversarial Robustness via Uncertainty-Aware Distributional Adversarial Training [43.766504246864045]
  We propose a novel uncertainty-aware distributional adversarial training method. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art adversarial robustness and maintains natural performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T07:26:24Z)
• Strategic Conformal Prediction [0.66567375919026]
  When a machine learning model is deployed, its predictions can alter its environment, as better informed agents strategize to suit their own interests. We propose a new framework, Strategic Conformal Prediction, which is capable of robust uncertainty quantification in such a setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T15:06:05Z)
• Ensembling Portfolio Strategies for Long-Term Investments: A Distribution-Free Preference Framework for Decision-Making and Algorithms [0.0]
  This paper investigates the problem of ensembling multiple strategies for sequential portfolios to outperform individual strategies in terms of long-term wealth.<n>We introduce a novel framework for decision-making in combining strategies, irrespective of market conditions.<n>We show results in favor of the proposed strategies, albeit with small tradeoffs in their Sharpe ratios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T23:08:57Z)
• Mutual-modality Adversarial Attack with Semantic Perturbation [81.66172089175346]
  We propose a novel approach that generates adversarial attacks in a mutual-modality optimization scheme. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art attack methods and can be readily deployed as a plug-and-play solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T05:06:01Z)
• Doubly Robust Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Training [107.40683655362285]
  We propose a novel doubly-robust instance reweighted adversarial framework. Our importance weights are obtained by optimizing the KL-divergence regularized loss function. Our proposed approach outperforms related state-of-the-art baseline methods in terms of average robust performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T06:16:18Z)
• Improving Adversarial Robustness with Self-Paced Hard-Class Pair Reweighting [5.084323778393556]
  adversarial training with untargeted attacks is one of the most recognized methods. We find that the naturally imbalanced inter-class semantic similarity makes those hard-class pairs to become the virtual targets of each other. We propose to upweight hard-class pair loss in model optimization, which prompts learning discriminative features from hard classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T22:51:36Z)
• Resisting Deep Learning Models Against Adversarial Attack Transferability via Feature Randomization [17.756085566366167]
  We propose a feature randomization-based approach that resists eight adversarial attacks targeting deep learning models. Our methodology can secure the target network and resists adversarial attack transferability by over 60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-11T20:14:12Z)
• Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness [53.094682754683255]
  We propose a Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack (MAMA) approach to discover stronger attack algorithms automatically. Our method learns the in adversarial attacks parameterized by a recurrent neural network. We develop a model-agnostic training algorithm to improve the ability of the learned when attacking unseen defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T13:54:24Z)
• On the Loss Landscape of Adversarial Training: Identifying Challenges and How to Overcome Them [57.957466608543676]
  We analyze the influence of adversarial training on the loss landscape of machine learning models. We show that the adversarial loss landscape is less favorable to optimization, due to increased curvature and more scattered gradients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:50:23Z)
• Adversarial Distributional Training for Robust Deep Learning [53.300984501078126]
  Adversarial training (AT) is among the most effective techniques to improve model robustness by augmenting training data with adversarial examples. Most existing AT methods adopt a specific attack to craft adversarial examples, leading to the unreliable robustness against other unseen attacks. In this paper, we introduce adversarial distributional training (ADT), a novel framework for learning robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-14T12:36:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.