On Defining Neural Averaging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14832v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 16:28:08 GMT
• Title: On Defining Neural Averaging
• Authors: Su Hyeong Lee, Richard Ngo,
• Abstract summary: Amortized Model Ensembling (AME) is a data-free meta-optimization approach that treats model differences as pseudogradients to guide neural weight updates.<n>We show AME produces averaged neural solutions that outperform both individual experts and model soup baselines.
• Score: 0.552480439325792
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: What does it even mean to average neural networks? We investigate the problem of synthesizing a single neural network from a collection of pretrained models, each trained on disjoint data shards, using only their final weights and no access to training data. In forming a definition of neural averaging, we take insight from model soup, which appears to aggregate multiple models into a singular model while enhancing generalization performance. In this work, we reinterpret model souping as a special case of a broader framework: Amortized Model Ensembling (AME) for neural averaging, a data-free meta-optimization approach that treats model differences as pseudogradients to guide neural weight updates. We show that this perspective not only recovers model soup but enables more expressive and adaptive ensembling strategies. Empirically, AME produces averaged neural solutions that outperform both individual experts and model soup baselines, especially in out-of-distribution settings. Our results suggest a principled and generalizable notion of data-free model weight aggregation and defines, in one sense, how to perform neural averaging.

Related papers

• Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regression [72.59731158970894]
  We present a unifying perspective on recent results on ridge regression.<n>We use the basic tools of random matrix theory and free probability, aimed at readers with backgrounds in physics and deep learning.<n>Our results extend and provide a unifying perspective on earlier models of scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T15:59:00Z)
• Out of the Ordinary: Spectrally Adapting Regression for Covariate Shift [12.770658031721435]
  We propose a method for adapting the weights of the last layer of a pre-trained neural regression model to perform better on input data originating from a different distribution. We demonstrate how this lightweight spectral adaptation procedure can improve out-of-distribution performance for synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-29T04:15:58Z)
• Neural Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape: A Framework for Interpretable Neural Regression Beyond the Mean [1.0923877073891446]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) have proven to be highly effective in a variety of tasks. Despite this success, the inner workings of DNNs are often not transparent. This lack of interpretability has led to increased research on inherently interpretable neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T17:06:13Z)
• On the Generalization and Adaption Performance of Causal Models [99.64022680811281]
  Differentiable causal discovery has proposed to factorize the data generating process into a set of modules. We study the generalization and adaption performance of such modular neural causal models. Our analysis shows that the modular neural causal models outperform other models on both zero and few-shot adaptation in low data regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:12:32Z)
• The Neural Coding Framework for Learning Generative Models [91.0357317238509]
  We propose a novel neural generative model inspired by the theory of predictive processing in the brain. In a similar way, artificial neurons in our generative model predict what neighboring neurons will do, and adjust their parameters based on how well the predictions matched reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T01:20:38Z)
• Sparsely constrained neural networks for model discovery of PDEs [0.0]
  We present a modular framework that determines the sparsity pattern of a deep-learning based surrogate using any sparse regression technique. We show how a different network architecture and sparsity estimator improve model discovery accuracy and convergence on several benchmark examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T11:02:40Z)
• A Bayesian Perspective on Training Speed and Model Selection [51.15664724311443]
  We show that a measure of a model's training speed can be used to estimate its marginal likelihood. We verify our results in model selection tasks for linear models and for the infinite-width limit of deep neural networks. Our results suggest a promising new direction towards explaining why neural networks trained with gradient descent are biased towards functions that generalize well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T17:56:14Z)
• Model Fusion with Kullback--Leibler Divergence [58.20269014662046]
  We propose a method to fuse posterior distributions learned from heterogeneous datasets. Our algorithm relies on a mean field assumption for both the fused model and the individual dataset posteriors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T03:27:45Z)
• Model Fusion via Optimal Transport [64.13185244219353]
  We present a layer-wise model fusion algorithm for neural networks. We show that this can successfully yield "one-shot" knowledge transfer between neural networks trained on heterogeneous non-i.i.d. data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-10-12T22:07:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.