Conformalized Exceptional Model Mining: Telling Where Your Model Performs (Not) Well

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15569v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:43:14 GMT
• Title: Conformalized Exceptional Model Mining: Telling Where Your Model Performs (Not) Well
• Authors: Xin Du, Sikun Yang, Wouter Duivesteijn, Mykola Pechenizkiy,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel framework, Conformalized Exceptional Model Mining.<n>It combines the rigor of Conformal Prediction with the explanatory power of Exceptional Model Mining.<n>We develop a new model class, mSMoPE, which quantifies uncertainty through conformal prediction's rigorous coverage guarantees.
• Score: 31.013018198280506
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Understanding the nuanced performance of machine learning models is essential for responsible deployment, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance. This paper introduces a novel framework, Conformalized Exceptional Model Mining, which combines the rigor of Conformal Prediction with the explanatory power of Exceptional Model Mining (EMM). The proposed framework identifies cohesive subgroups within data where model performance deviates exceptionally, highlighting regions of both high confidence and high uncertainty. We develop a new model class, mSMoPE (multiplex Soft Model Performance Evaluation), which quantifies uncertainty through conformal prediction's rigorous coverage guarantees. By defining a new quality measure, Relative Average Uncertainty Loss (RAUL), our framework isolates subgroups with exceptional performance patterns in multi-class classification and regression tasks. Experimental results across diverse datasets demonstrate the framework's effectiveness in uncovering interpretable subgroups that provide critical insights into model behavior. This work lays the groundwork for enhancing model interpretability and reliability, advancing the state-of-the-art in explainable AI and uncertainty quantification.

Related papers

• STAR : Bridging Statistical and Agentic Reasoning for Large Model Performance Prediction [78.0692157478247]
  We propose STAR, a framework that bridges data-driven STatistical expectations with knowledge-driven Agentic Reasoning.<n>We show that STAR consistently outperforms all baselines on both score-based and rank-based metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T16:30:07Z)
• An Integrated Fusion Framework for Ensemble Learning Leveraging Gradient Boosting and Fuzzy Rule-Based Models [59.13182819190547]
  Fuzzy rule-based models excel in interpretability and have seen widespread application across diverse fields.<n>They face challenges such as complex design specifications and scalability issues with large datasets.<n>This paper proposes an Integrated Fusion Framework that merges the strengths of both paradigms to enhance model performance and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T10:28:23Z)
• Learning Robust Diffusion Models from Imprecise Supervision [75.53546939251146]
  DMIS is a unified framework for training robust Conditional Diffusion Models from Imprecise Supervision.<n>Our framework is derived from likelihood and decomposes the objective into generative and classification components.<n>Experiments on diverse forms of imprecise supervision, covering tasks covering image generation, weakly supervised learning, and dataset condensation demonstrate that DMIS consistently produces high-quality and class-discriminative samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T14:00:32Z)
• Relative Overfitting and Accept-Reject Framework [5.465098504510676]
  We propose an ensemble framework that governs how models are segmented to ensure performance improvement.<n>We detail the patterns of this framework within the domain of NLP and briefly describe its to other fields, such as computer vision (CV) and AI for science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T17:36:14Z)
• Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z)
• LoRE-Merging: Exploring Low-Rank Estimation For Large Language Model Merging [10.33844295243509]
  We propose a unified framework for model merging based on low-rank estimation of task vectors without the need for access to the base model, named textscLoRE-Merging.<n>Our approach is motivated by the observation that task vectors from fine-tuned models frequently exhibit a limited number of dominant singular values, making low-rank estimations less prone to interference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T10:18:46Z)
• On the Reasoning Capacity of AI Models and How to Quantify It [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have intensified the debate surrounding the fundamental nature of their reasoning capabilities.<n>While achieving high performance on benchmarks such as GPQA and MMLU, these models exhibit limitations in more complex reasoning tasks.<n>We propose a novel phenomenological approach that goes beyond traditional accuracy metrics to probe the underlying mechanisms of model behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T16:58:18Z)
• Challenging the Performance-Interpretability Trade-off: An Evaluation of Interpretable Machine Learning Models [3.3595341706248876]
  Generalized additive models (GAMs) offer promising properties for capturing complex, non-linear patterns while remaining fully interpretable. This study examines the predictive performance of seven different GAMs in comparison to seven commonly used machine learning models based on a collection of twenty benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T12:58:52Z)
• PerturBench: Benchmarking Machine Learning Models for Cellular Perturbation Analysis [14.298235969992877]
  We introduce a comprehensive framework for perturbation response modeling in single cells.<n>Our approach includes a modular and user-friendly model development and evaluation platform.<n>We highlight the limitations of widely used models, such as mode collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T07:40:20Z)
• On the Generalization and Adaption Performance of Causal Models [99.64022680811281]
  Differentiable causal discovery has proposed to factorize the data generating process into a set of modules. We study the generalization and adaption performance of such modular neural causal models. Our analysis shows that the modular neural causal models outperform other models on both zero and few-shot adaptation in low data regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:12:32Z)
• Characterizing Fairness Over the Set of Good Models Under Selective Labels [69.64662540443162]
  We develop a framework for characterizing predictive fairness properties over the set of models that deliver similar overall performance. We provide tractable algorithms to compute the range of attainable group-level predictive disparities. We extend our framework to address the empirically relevant challenge of selectively labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T02:11:37Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.