Evaluating classical simulations with a quantum processor
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15759v1
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 17:55:53 GMT
- Title: Evaluating classical simulations with a quantum processor
- Authors: Alberto Nocera, Jack Raymond, William Bernoudy, Mohammad H. Amin, Andrew D. King,
- Abstract summary: Scaling predictions are based on local structure and assumptions.<n>We use a quantum annealing processor to produce a ground truth for evaluating classical tensor-network methods.<n>Our results demonstrate that the virtuous cycle of competition between classical and quantum simulations can lend insight in both directions.
- Score: 0.5592394503914488
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: As simulations of quantum systems cross the limits of classical computability, both quantum and classical approaches become hard to verify. Scaling predictions are therefore based on local structure and asymptotic assumptions, typically with classical methods being used to evaluate quantum simulators where possible. Here, in contrast, we use a quantum annealing processor to produce a ground truth for evaluating classical tensor-network methods whose scaling has not yet been firmly established. Our observations run contrary to previous scaling predictions, demonstrating the need for caution when extrapolating the accuracy of classical simulations of quantum dynamics. Our results demonstrate that the virtuous cycle of competition between classical and quantum simulations can lend insight in both directions.
Related papers
- Fermionic dynamics on a trapped-ion quantum computer beyond exact classical simulation [0.024486319744627862]
We implement an efficient quantum simulation algorithm on Quantinuum's System Model H2 trapped-ion quantum computer.<n>We focus on the periodic spinful 2D Fermi-Hubbard model and present evidence of spin-charge separation.<n>Our results herald the use of quantum computing for simulating strongly correlated electronic systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-30T09:39:02Z) - Operationally classical simulation of quantum states [41.94295877935867]
A classical state-preparation device cannot generate superpositions and hence its emitted states must commute.<n>We show that no such simulation exists, thereby certifying quantum coherence.<n>Our approach is a possible avenue to understand how and to what extent quantum states defy generic models based on classical devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-03T15:25:03Z) - Efficient quantum-enhanced classical simulation for patches of quantum landscapes [0.0]
We show that it is always possible to generate a classical surrogate of a sub-region of an expectation landscape produced by a parameterized quantum circuit.<n>We provide a quantum-enhanced classical algorithm which, after simple measurements on a quantum device, allows one to classically simulate approximate expectation values of a subregion of a landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-29T18:00:07Z) - Efficient Learning for Linear Properties of Bounded-Gate Quantum Circuits [63.733312560668274]
Given a quantum circuit containing d tunable RZ gates and G-d Clifford gates, can a learner perform purely classical inference to efficiently predict its linear properties?
We prove that the sample complexity scaling linearly in d is necessary and sufficient to achieve a small prediction error, while the corresponding computational complexity may scale exponentially in d.
We devise a kernel-based learning model capable of trading off prediction error and computational complexity, transitioning from exponential to scaling in many practical settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T08:21:28Z) - Benchmarking highly entangled states on a 60-atom analog quantum
simulator [7.354547292158537]
We perform fidelity benchmarking and mixed-state entanglement estimation with a 60-atom analog Rydberg quantum simulator.
Our results enable a new paradigm for evaluating the ability of both analog and digital quantum devices to generate entanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-15T17:54:31Z) - Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics [55.41644538483948]
We explore the applicability of quantum-data learning to practical problems in high-energy physics.
We make use of ansatz based on quantum convolutional neural networks and numerically show that it is capable of recognizing quantum phases of ground states.
The observation of non-trivial learning properties demonstrated in these benchmarks will motivate further exploration of the quantum-data learning architecture in high-energy physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-29T18:00:01Z) - Tensor Networks or Decision Diagrams? Guidelines for Classical Quantum
Circuit Simulation [65.93830818469833]
tensor networks and decision diagrams have independently been developed with differing perspectives, terminologies, and backgrounds in mind.
We consider how these techniques approach classical quantum circuit simulation, and examine their (dis)similarities with regard to their most applicable abstraction level.
We provide guidelines for when to better use tensor networks and when to better use decision diagrams in classical quantum circuit simulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-13T19:00:00Z) - Anticipative measurements in hybrid quantum-classical computation [68.8204255655161]
We present an approach where the quantum computation is supplemented by a classical result.
Taking advantage of its anticipation also leads to a new type of quantum measurements, which we call anticipative.
In an anticipative quantum measurement the combination of the results from classical and quantum computations happens only in the end.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-12T15:47:44Z) - Classical Tracking for Quantum Trajectories [1.284647943889634]
Quantum state estimation, based on the numerical integration of master equations (SMEs), provides estimates for the evolution of quantum systems.
We show that classical tracking methods based on particle filters can be used to track quantum states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-01T08:39:19Z) - Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics: A performance study on the
spin-boson model [68.8204255655161]
Quantum algorithms for quantum dynamics simulations are traditionally based on implementing a Trotter-approximation of the time-evolution operator.
variational quantum algorithms have become an indispensable alternative, enabling small-scale simulations on present-day hardware.
We show that, despite providing a clear reduction of quantum gate cost, the variational method in its current implementation is unlikely to lead to a quantum advantage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-09T18:00:05Z) - Efficient classical computation of expectation values in a class of
quantum circuits with an epistemically restricted phase space representation [0.0]
We devise a classical algorithm which efficiently computes the quantum expectation values arising in a class of continuous variable quantum circuits.
The classical computational algorithm exploits a specific restriction in classical phase space which directly captures the quantum uncertainty relation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-21T06:43:34Z) - Error mitigation and quantum-assisted simulation in the error corrected
regime [77.34726150561087]
A standard approach to quantum computing is based on the idea of promoting a classically simulable and fault-tolerant set of operations.
We show how the addition of noisy magic resources allows one to boost classical quasiprobability simulations of a quantum circuit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-12T20:58:41Z) - From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover.
The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.