Retrieval Enhanced Feedback via In-context Neural Error-book

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16313v4
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 02:08:36 GMT
• Title: Retrieval Enhanced Feedback via In-context Neural Error-book
• Authors: Jongyeop Hyun, Bumsoo Kim,
• Abstract summary: We propose REFINE: Retrieval-Enhanced Feedback via In-student Neural Error-context book.<n> REFINE systematically structures errors and provides targeted feedback.<n>Our results demonstrate substantial speedup, reduced computational costs, and successful generalization.
• Score: 8.862195491555575
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved reasoning capabilities, with in-context learning (ICL) emerging as a key technique for adaptation without retraining. While previous works have focused on leveraging correct examples, recent research highlights the importance of learning from errors to enhance performance. However, existing methods lack a structured framework for analyzing and mitigating errors, particularly in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), where integrating visual and textual inputs adds complexity. To address this issue, we propose REFINE: Retrieval-Enhanced Feedback via In-context Neural Error-book, a teacher-student framework that systematically structures errors and provides targeted feedback. REFINE introduces three systematic queries to construct structured feedback -- Feed-Target, Feed-Check, and Feed-Path -- to enhance multimodal reasoning by prioritizing relevant visual information, diagnosing critical failure points, and formulating corrective actions. Unlike prior approaches that rely on redundant retrievals, REFINE optimizes structured feedback retrieval, improving inference efficiency, token usage, and scalability. Our results demonstrate substantial speedup, reduced computational costs, and successful generalization, highlighting REFINE's potential for enhancing multimodal reasoning.

Related papers

• Implicit Neural Representation-Based Continuous Single Image Super Resolution: An Empirical Study [50.15623093332659]
  Implicit neural representation (INR) has become the standard approach for arbitrary-scale image super-resolution (ASSR)<n>We compare existing techniques across diverse settings and present aggregated performance results on multiple image quality metrics.<n>We examine a new loss function that penalizes intensity variations while preserving edges, textures, and finer details during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T07:09:20Z)
• Multi-hop Reasoning via Early Knowledge Alignment [68.28168992785896]
  Early Knowledge Alignment (EKA) aims to align Large Language Models with contextually relevant retrieved knowledge.<n>EKA significantly improves retrieval precision, reduces cascading errors, and enhances both performance and efficiency.<n>EKA proves effective as a versatile, training-free inference strategy that scales seamlessly to large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:14:44Z)
• CIR-CoT: Towards Interpretable Composed Image Retrieval via End-to-End Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [93.05917922306196]
  Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) aims to find a target image from a reference image and a modification text.<n>CIR-CoT is the first end-to-end retrieval-oriented MLLM designed to integrate explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T09:41:45Z)
• In-Place Feedback: A New Paradigm for Guiding LLMs in Multi-Turn Reasoning [10.138497038893096]
  We introduce in-place feedback, a novel interaction paradigm in which users directly edit an LLM's previous response.<n> Empirical evaluations on reasoning-intensive benchmarks reveal that in-place feedback achieves better performance than conventional multi-turn feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T11:16:04Z)
• Automated Optimization Modeling through Expert-Guided Large Language Model Reasoning [43.63419208391747]
  We present a novel framework that leverages expert-level optimization modeling principles through chain-of-thought reasoning to automate the optimization process.<n>We also introduce LogiOR, a new optimization modeling benchmark from the logistics domain, containing more complex problems with standardized annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T04:14:54Z)
• AURORA: Augmented Understanding via Structured Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning for Reference Audio-Visual Segmentation [113.75682363364004]
  AURORA is a framework designed to enhance genuine reasoning and language comprehension in reference audio-visual segmentation.<n>AURORA achieves state-of-the-art performance on Ref-AVS benchmarks and generalizes effectively to unreferenced segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T07:47:38Z)
• Rethinking Prompt Optimization: Reinforcement, Diversification, and Migration in Blackbox LLMs [10.434732630519377]
  We propose a novel Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO) framework centered on enhancing the feedback mechanism.<n>To mitigate the noise inherent in LLM-generated feedback, we introduce a technique called feedback diversification.<n>Our approach consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving significant accuracy improvements, faster convergence, and lower computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T00:20:14Z)
• From Ambiguity to Accuracy: The Transformative Effect of Coreference Resolution on Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems [6.762635083456022]
  We investigate how entity coreference affects both document retrieval and generative performance in RAG-based systems.<n>We demonstrate that coreference resolution enhances retrieval effectiveness and improves question-answering (QA) performance.<n>This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the challenges posed by coreferential complexity in RAG, providing guidance for improving retrieval and generation in knowledge-intensive AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T15:26:59Z)
• Improving Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Language Models through Dialectic Reasoning Argumentations [65.11348389219887]
  We introduce Dialectic-RAG (DRAG), a modular approach that evaluates retrieved information by comparing, contrasting, and resolving conflicting perspectives.<n>We show the impact of our framework both as an in-context learning strategy and for constructing demonstrations to instruct smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T06:55:15Z)
• ReLearn: Unlearning via Learning for Large Language Models [64.2802606302194]
  We propose ReLearn, a data augmentation and fine-tuning pipeline for effective unlearning.<n>This framework introduces Knowledge Forgetting Rate (KFR) and Knowledge Retention Rate (KRR) to measure knowledge-level preservation.<n>Our experiments show that ReLearn successfully achieves targeted forgetting while preserving high-quality output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:31:00Z)
• In-context Demonstration Matters: On Prompt Optimization for Pseudo-Supervision Refinement [71.60563181678323]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved great success across diverse tasks, and fine-tuning is sometimes needed to further enhance generation quality.<n>To handle these challenges, a direct solution is to generate high-confidence'' data from unsupervised downstream tasks.<n>We propose a novel approach, pseudo-supervised demonstrations aligned prompt optimization (PAPO) algorithm, which jointly refines both the prompt and the overall pseudo-supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T03:39:28Z)
• VERA: Validation and Enhancement for Retrieval Augmented systems [0.0]
  We propose textbfVERA (textbfValidation and textbfEnhancement for textbfRetrieval textbfAugmented systems), a system designed to evaluate and enhance the retrieved context before response generation. VERA employs an evaluator-cum-enhancer LLM that first checks if external retrieval is necessary, evaluates the relevance and redundancy of the retrieved context, and refines it to eliminate non-essential information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T16:10:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.