VERA: Validation and Enhancement for Retrieval Augmented systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15364v1
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:10:47 GMT
- Title: VERA: Validation and Enhancement for Retrieval Augmented systems
- Authors: Nitin Aravind Birur, Tanay Baswa, Divyanshu Kumar, Jatan Loya, Sahil Agarwal, Prashanth Harshangi,
- Abstract summary: We propose textbfVERA (textbfValidation and textbfEnhancement for textbfRetrieval textbfAugmented systems), a system designed to evaluate and enhance the retrieved context before response generation.
VERA employs an evaluator-cum-enhancer LLM that first checks if external retrieval is necessary, evaluates the relevance and redundancy of the retrieved context, and refines it to eliminate non-essential information.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities but often produce inaccurate responses, as they rely solely on their embedded knowledge. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances LLMs by incorporating an external information retrieval system, supplying additional context along with the query to mitigate inaccuracies for a particular context. However, accuracy issues still remain, as the model may rely on irrelevant documents or extrapolate incorrectly from its training knowledge. To assess and improve the performance of both the retrieval system and the LLM in a RAG framework, we propose \textbf{VERA} (\textbf{V}alidation and \textbf{E}nhancement for \textbf{R}etrieval \textbf{A}ugmented systems), a system designed to: 1) Evaluate and enhance the retrieved context before response generation, and 2) Evaluate and refine the LLM-generated response to ensure precision and minimize errors. VERA employs an evaluator-cum-enhancer LLM that first checks if external retrieval is necessary, evaluates the relevance and redundancy of the retrieved context, and refines it to eliminate non-essential information. Post-response generation, VERA splits the response into atomic statements, assesses their relevance to the query, and ensures adherence to the context. Our experiments demonstrate VERA's remarkable efficacy not only in improving the performance of smaller open-source models, but also larger state-of-the art models. These enhancements underscore VERA's potential to produce accurate and relevant responses, advancing the state-of-the-art in retrieval-augmented language modeling. VERA's robust methodology, combining multiple evaluation and refinement steps, effectively mitigates hallucinations and improves retrieval and response processes, making it a valuable tool for applications demanding high accuracy and reliability in information generation. .
Related papers
- Retriever-and-Memory: Towards Adaptive Note-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation [72.70046559930555]
We propose a generic RAG approach called Adaptive Note-Enhanced RAG (Adaptive-Note) for complex QA tasks.
Specifically, Adaptive-Note introduces an overarching view of knowledge growth, iteratively gathering new information in the form of notes.
In addition, we employ an adaptive, note-based stop-exploration strategy to decide "what to retrieve and when to stop" to encourage sufficient knowledge exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T14:03:29Z) - Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation [19.312330150540912]
An emerging application is using Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) capabilities.
We propose FRAMES, a high-quality evaluation dataset designed to test LLMs' ability to provide factual responses.
We present baseline results demonstrating that even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle with this task, achieving 0.40 accuracy with no retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T17:52:07Z) - SFR-RAG: Towards Contextually Faithful LLMs [57.666165819196486]
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is a paradigm that integrates external contextual information with large language models (LLMs) to enhance factual accuracy and relevance.
We introduce SFR-RAG, a small LLM that is instruction-textual with an emphasis on context-grounded generation and hallucination.
We also present ConBench, a new evaluation framework compiling multiple popular and diverse RAG benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-16T01:08:18Z) - RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios.
With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance.
Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z) - Think-then-Act: A Dual-Angle Evaluated Retrieval-Augmented Generation [3.2134014920850364]
Large language models (LLMs) often face challenges such as temporal misalignment and generating hallucinatory content.
We propose a dual-angle evaluated retrieval-augmented generation framework textitThink-then-Act'
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T20:51:34Z) - Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented LMs with a Two-stage Consistency Learning Compressor [4.35807211471107]
This work proposes a novel two-stage consistency learning approach for retrieved information compression in retrieval-augmented language models.
The proposed method is empirically validated across multiple datasets, demonstrating notable enhancements in precision and efficiency for question-answering tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T12:43:23Z) - ERAGent: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with Improved Accuracy, Efficiency, and Personalization [14.62114319247837]
We introduce ERAGent, a cutting-edge framework that embodies an advancement in the RAG area.
Retrieval Trigger is incorporated to curtail extraneous external knowledge retrieval without sacrificing response quality.
ERAGent personalizes responses by incorporating a learned user profile.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-06T04:42:18Z) - RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generation [42.82192656794179]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities but are prone to generating inaccurate or hallucinatory responses.
This limitation stems from their reliance on vast pretraining datasets, making them susceptible to errors in unseen scenarios.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this by incorporating external, relevant documents into the response generation process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-31T08:58:54Z) - REAR: A Relevance-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Open-Domain
Question Answering [122.62012375722124]
In existing methods, large language models (LLMs) cannot precisely assess the relevance of retrieved documents.
We propose REAR, a RElevance-Aware Retrieval-augmented approach for open-domain question answering (QA)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T13:22:51Z) - ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases.
We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets.
Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z) - Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through
Self-Reflection [74.51523859064802]
We introduce a new framework called Self-Reflective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Self-RAG)
Self-RAG enhances an LM's quality and factuality through retrieval and self-reflection.
It significantly outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs and retrieval-augmented models on a diverse set of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T18:18:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.