Intersubjective Agreement about Quantum States Is Unnecessary in QBism

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16683v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:31:12 GMT
• Title: Intersubjective Agreement about Quantum States Is Unnecessary in QBism
• Abstract summary: We argue that intersubjective agreement on quantum states is unnecessary.<n>We argue that the QBist notion of reciprocity leads to sharper characterization of what it means to objectify quantum systems.
• Score: 0.5161531917413708
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The thought experiment called Wigner's Friend has experienced a renewal of interest for interrogating the meaning of intersubjectivity and objectivity in quantum mechanics. These new inquiries extend to investigations at the intersection of phenomenology and QBism. Philosopher of physics Steven French has criticized QBism on the grounds that it does not give assurances that Wigner and friend must agree on the same quantum state or the same set of facts in the experiment. In this paper, we draw on Wigner's Friend to argue that intersubjective agreement on quantum states is unnecessary. We defend the QBist notion of reciprocity, treating Wigner and friend as "peer observers" or physical systems taking mutual actions on each other. We argue that accounts of intersubjectivity that preserve the possibility of privileged observation, vantage points for solipsistic super-observers, undermine the epistemic benefits we look for when we insist on intersubjectivity agreement as a criterion for objectivity. In its place, the QBist notion of reciprocity leads to sharper characterization of what it means to objectify quantum systems with a quantum state assignment. Drawing on phenomenological resources, we argue that state assignments for quantum systems, including those for Wigner and friend, are thematizations. To assign a quantum state is to thematize a phenomenon as a quantum system, to treat something as the sort of object to which the formalism applies. Our argument accounts for why the quantum formalism does not radically change in application for different systems because the systems themselves exceed their formalization.

Related papers

• Identifying the $3$-qubit $W$ state with quantum uncertainty relation [14.803730343784439]
  The $W$ state is a canonical representative of multipartite quantum entanglement.<n>This paper introduces a novel approach to identifying tripartite $W$ states by leveraging tripartite quantum uncertainty relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T14:59:48Z)
• QBism and relational interpretation of quantum mechanics from the point of view of a contextual quantum realism (CQR) [0.0]
  A realist interpretation of quantum mechanics is proposed - Contextual Quantum Realism (CQR)<n>CQR is compared with QBism and Quantum Mechanics (RQM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T10:22:47Z)
• Intrinsic Quantum Mpemba Effect in Markovian Systems and Quantum Circuits [9.979018524312751]
  The quantum Mpemba effect (QME) describes the counterintuitive phenomenon in which a system farther from equilibrium reaches steady state faster than one closer to equilibrium.<n>Here we propose the intrinsic quantum Mpemba effect (IQME), defined using the trajectory length traced by the quantum state as a more appropriate measure of distance.<n>This work deepens our understanding of quantum state evolution and lays the foundation for accurately capturing novel quantum dynamical behaviour.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T15:00:59Z)
• Quantum Probabilities Are Objective Degrees of Epistemic Justification [0.0]
  QBism is one of the most widely discussed'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. This paper takes QBism as a starting point, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T22:07:34Z)
• The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach [0.0]
  I argue that quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T00:19:04Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Measurement with A New Space-Time Approach to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics [9.116661570248171]
  Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement. We employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T13:25:08Z)
• Perspectival Quantum Realism [0.0]
  We argue that the problems identified by QBism and Quantum Pragmatism do not necessitate abandoning the ideal of representing the physical world. We can avail ourselves of the same puzzle-solving strategies as employed by QBists and pragmatists by adopting a emphperspectival quantum realism
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T16:23:54Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
  This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
• The view from a Wigner bubble [0.0]
  I argue that the key distinction between QBism and realist interpretations of quantum mechanics is best understood in terms of their adherence to different theories of truth. The notion of reality afforded by QBism will correspond to the invariant elements of any theory that has pragmatic value to all rational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T04:21:33Z)
• QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed [0.0]
  We evaluate the plausibility of recent criticism of QBism. We focus on the consequences of the subjective character of the quantum state, the issue of realism and the problem of the evolution of the quantum state in QBism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-04T11:38:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.