The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16371v3
• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 22:33:10 GMT
• Title: The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach
• Authors: Michael E. Cuffaro
• Abstract summary: I argue that quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: I flesh out the sense in which the informational approach to interpreting quantum mechanics, as defended by Pitowsky and Bub and lately by a number of other authors, is (neo-)Bohrian. I argue that on this approach, quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a ``natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' in the sense that the idea (which philosophers of science like Stein have argued for on the grounds of practical and epistemic necessity) that understanding a theory as a theory of physics requires that one be able to ``schematise the observer'' within it is elevated in quantum mechanics to the level of a postulate in the sense that interpreting the outcome of a measurement interaction, as providing us with information about the world, requires as a matter of principle, the specification of a schematic representation of an observer in the form of a `Boolean frame' -- the Boolean algebra representing the yes-or-no questions associated with a given observable representative of a given experimental context. I argue that the approach's central concern is with the methodological question of how to assign physical properties to what one takes to be a system in a given experimental context, rather than the metaphysical question of what a given state vector represents independently of any context, and I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint that the orthodox approach to quantum mechanics runs afoul of the supposedly fundamental methodological requirement to the effect that one must always be able, according to Einstein, to treat spatially separated systems as isolated from one another.

Related papers

• Postulating the Unicity of the Macroscopic Physical World [0.0]
  We argue that the unicity of the macroscopic world is a fundamental postulate of physics, rather than an issue that must be mathematically justified or demonstrated. This is made possible by using general operator algebras to extend the mathematical description of the physical world towards macroscopic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T19:21:36Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• On idealism of Anton Zeilinger's information interpretation of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  We argue that Anton Zeilinger's "foundational conceptual principle" for quantum mechanics is an idealistic principle, which should be replaced by a realistic principle of contextuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-16T08:56:58Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
  This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
• Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, "It is only the theory which decides what can be observed.") [0.0]
  We argue that the ad hoc introduction of the projection postulate (or measurement rule) can be understood as a necessary requirement coming from a naive empiricist standpoint. We discuss the general physical conditions for measuring and observing quantum superpositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T14:30:56Z)
• From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
  We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover. The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
• Bohr meets Rovelli: a dispositionalist account of the quantum limits of knowledge [0.0]
  I argue that the no-go theorems reflect on a formal level those practical and experimental settings that are needed to come to know the properties of physical systems. I show that, as a consequence of a relationist and perspectival approach to quantum mechanics, the quantum state of the universe regarded as an isolated system cannot be known in principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T22:45:09Z)
• The (Quantum) Measurement Problem in Classical Mechanics [0.0]
  We show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta. We discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and'measurement' We show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-01T17:07:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.