QFrCoLA: a Quebec-French Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability Judgments

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16867v1
• Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 01:51:45 GMT
• Title: QFrCoLA: a Quebec-French Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability Judgments
• Authors: David Beauchemin, Richard Khoury,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces QFrCoLA, a normative binary acceptability judgments dataset comprising 25,153 in-domain and 2,675 out-of-domain sentences.<n>We benchmark seven language models using QFrCoLA and seven other linguistic binary acceptability judgment corpora.<n>On average, fine-tuned Transformer-based LM are strong baselines for most languages and that zero-shot binary classification large language models perform poorly on the task.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large and Transformer-based language models perform outstandingly in various downstream tasks. However, there is limited understanding regarding how these models internalize linguistic knowledge, so various linguistic benchmarks have recently been proposed to facilitate syntactic evaluation of language models across languages. This paper introduces QFrCoLA (Quebec-French Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability Judgments), a normative binary acceptability judgments dataset comprising 25,153 in-domain and 2,675 out-of-domain sentences. Our study leverages the QFrCoLA dataset and seven other linguistic binary acceptability judgment corpora to benchmark seven language models. The results demonstrate that, on average, fine-tuned Transformer-based LM are strong baselines for most languages and that zero-shot binary classification large language models perform poorly on the task. However, for the QFrCoLA benchmark, on average, a fine-tuned Transformer-based LM outperformed other methods tested. It also shows that pre-trained cross-lingual LLMs selected for our experimentation do not seem to have acquired linguistic judgment capabilities during their pre-training for Quebec French. Finally, our experiment results on QFrCoLA show that our dataset, built from examples that illustrate linguistic norms rather than speakers' feelings, is similar to linguistic acceptability judgment; it is a challenging dataset that can benchmark LM on their linguistic judgment capabilities.

Related papers

• CLaS-Bench: A Cross-Lingual Alignment and Steering Benchmark [21.574271160875046]
  We introduce CLaS-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating language-forcing behavior in large language models (LLMs) across 32 languages.<n>We find that across languages simple residual-based DiffMean method consistently outperforms all other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T08:42:03Z)
• Adapting Language Models to Indonesian Local Languages: An Empirical Study of Language Transferability on Zero-Shot Settings [1.1556013985948772]
  We evaluate transferability of pre-trained language models to low-resource Indonesian local languages.<n>We group the target languages into three categories: seen, partially seen, and unseen.<n> Multilingual models perform best on seen languages, moderately on partially seen ones, and poorly on unseen languages.<n>We find that MAD-X significantly improves performance, especially for seen and partially seen languages, without requiring labeled data in the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T12:17:55Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts.<n>We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion.<n>We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• MELA: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability [7.524375463656369]
  We present the largest benchmark to date on linguistic acceptability: Multilingual Evaluation of Linguistic Acceptability -- MELA, with 46K samples covering 10 languages. In pursuit of multilingual interpretability, we conduct probing experiments with fine-tuned XLM-R. Cross-lingual transfer experiments show that transfer in acceptability judgment is non-trivial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T15:25:28Z)
• Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language Acquisition [4.779196219827507]
  We argue that some of the most prominent benchmarks for evaluating the syntactic capacities of neural language models may not be sufficiently rigorous. When trained on small-scale data modeling child language acquisition, the LMs can be readily matched by simple baseline models. We conclude with suggestions for better connecting LMs with the empirical study of child language acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T00:16:17Z)
• Soft Language Clustering for Multilingual Model Pre-training [57.18058739931463]
  We propose XLM-P, which contextually retrieves prompts as flexible guidance for encoding instances conditionally. Our XLM-P enables (1) lightweight modeling of language-invariant and language-specific knowledge across languages, and (2) easy integration with other multilingual pre-training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T08:08:08Z)
• RuCoLA: Russian Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability [6.500438378175089]
  We introduce the Russian Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability (RuCoLA) RuCoLA consists of $9.8$k in-domain sentences from linguistic publications and $3.6$k out-of-domain sentences produced by generative models. We demonstrate that the most widely used language models still fall behind humans by a large margin, especially when detecting morphological and semantic errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T18:29:22Z)
• On Cross-Lingual Retrieval with Multilingual Text Encoders [51.60862829942932]
  We study the suitability of state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks. We benchmark their performance in unsupervised ad-hoc sentence- and document-level CLIR experiments. We evaluate multilingual encoders fine-tuned in a supervised fashion (i.e., we learn to rank) on English relevance data in a series of zero-shot language and domain transfer CLIR experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:10:27Z)
• A Massively Multilingual Analysis of Cross-linguality in Shared Embedding Space [61.18554842370824]
  In cross-lingual language models, representations for many different languages live in the same space. We compute a task-based measure of cross-lingual alignment in the form of bitext retrieval performance. We examine a range of linguistic, quasi-linguistic, and training-related features as potential predictors of these alignment metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T21:05:37Z)
• XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic Contextualization [98.61159823343036]
  We present the Word-in-Context dataset (WiC) for assessing the ability to correctly model distinct meanings of a word. We put forward a large multilingual benchmark, XL-WiC, featuring gold standards in 12 new languages. Experimental results show that even when no tagged instances are available for a target language, models trained solely on the English data can attain competitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T15:32:00Z)
• XCOPA: A Multilingual Dataset for Causal Commonsense Reasoning [68.57658225995966]
  Cross-lingual Choice of Plausible Alternatives (XCOPA) is a typologically diverse multilingual dataset for causal commonsense reasoning in 11 languages. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models on this novel dataset, revealing that the performance of current methods falls short compared to translation-based transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T12:22:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.