Towards a Real-World Aligned Benchmark for Unlearning in Recommender Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17076v2
• Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:17:43 GMT
• Title: Towards a Real-World Aligned Benchmark for Unlearning in Recommender Systems
• Authors: Pierre Lubitzsch, Olga Ovcharenko, Hao Chen, Maarten de Rijke, Sebastian Schelter,
• Abstract summary: We propose a set of design desiderata and research questions to guide the development of a more realistic benchmark for unlearning in recommender systems.<n>We argue for an unlearning setup that reflects the sequential, time-sensitive nature of real-world deletion requests.<n>We present a preliminary experiment in a next-basket recommendation setting based on our proposed desiderata and find that unlearning also works for sequential recommendation models.
• Score: 49.766845975588275
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern recommender systems heavily leverage user interaction data to deliver personalized experiences. However, relying on personal data presents challenges in adhering to privacy regulations, such as the GDPR's "right to be forgotten". Machine unlearning (MU) aims to address these challenges by enabling the efficient removal of specific training data from models post-training, without compromising model utility or leaving residual information. However, current benchmarks for unlearning in recommender systems -- most notably CURE4Rec -- fail to reflect real-world operational demands. They focus narrowly on collaborative filtering, overlook tasks like session-based and next-basket recommendation, simulate unrealistically large unlearning requests, and ignore critical efficiency constraints. In this paper, we propose a set of design desiderata and research questions to guide the development of a more realistic benchmark for unlearning in recommender systems, with the goal of gathering feedback from the research community. Our benchmark proposal spans multiple recommendation tasks, includes domain-specific unlearning scenarios, and several unlearning algorithms -- including ones adapted from a recent NeurIPS unlearning competition. Furthermore, we argue for an unlearning setup that reflects the sequential, time-sensitive nature of real-world deletion requests. We also present a preliminary experiment in a next-basket recommendation setting based on our proposed desiderata and find that unlearning also works for sequential recommendation models, exposed to many small unlearning requests. In this case, we observe that a modification of a custom-designed unlearning algorithm for recommender systems outperforms general unlearning algorithms significantly, and that unlearning can be executed with a latency of only several seconds.

Related papers

• Curriculum Approximate Unlearning for Session-based Recommendation [56.86137487298901]
  Approximate unlearning for session-based recommendation refers to eliminating the influence of specific training samples from the recommender without retraining.<n> Gradient ascent (GA) is a representative method to conduct approximate unlearning.<n>We introduce CAU, a curriculum approximate unlearning framework tailored to session-based recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T05:52:28Z)
• Can Prompt Difficulty be Online Predicted for Accelerating RL Finetuning of Reasoning Models? [62.579951798437115]
  This work investigates iterative approximate evaluation for arbitrary prompts.<n>It introduces Model Predictive Prompt Selection (MoPPS), a Bayesian risk-predictive framework.<n>MoPPS reliably predicts prompt difficulty and accelerates training with significantly reduced rollouts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T03:20:52Z)
• Pre-training for Recommendation Unlearning [14.514770044236375]
  UnlearnRec is a model-agnostic pre-training paradigm that prepares systems for efficient unlearning operations.<n>Our method delivers exceptional unlearning effectiveness while providing more than 10x speedup compared to retraining approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:57:11Z)
• A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following [83.71180850955679]
  We use a novel synthetic data generation pipeline to generate 48,000 instruction unique-following prompts.<n>With our synthetic prompts, we use two preference dataset curation methods - rejection sampling (RS) and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)<n>Experiments reveal that shared prefixes in preference pairs, as generated by MCTS, provide marginal but consistent improvements.<n>High-contrast preference pairs generally outperform low-contrast pairs; however, combining both often yields the best performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T15:38:39Z)
• A Survey on Recommendation Unlearning: Fundamentals, Taxonomy, Evaluation, and Open Questions [16.00188808166725]
  recommender systems have become increasingly influential in shaping user behavior and decision-making.<n>Widespread adoption of machine learning models in recommender systems has raised significant concerns regarding user privacy and security.<n>Traditional machine unlearning methods are ill-suited for recommendation unlearning due to the unique challenges posed by collaborative interactions and model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T11:58:55Z)
• Real-Time Personalization for LLM-based Recommendation with Customized In-Context Learning [57.28766250993726]
  This work explores adapting to dynamic user interests without any model updates. Existing Large Language Model (LLM)-based recommenders often lose the in-context learning ability during recommendation tuning. We propose RecICL, which customizes recommendation-specific in-context learning for real-time recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T15:48:36Z)
• Meta-Learning with Adaptive Weighted Loss for Imbalanced Cold-Start Recommendation [4.379304291229695]
  We propose a novel sequential recommendation framework based on gradient-based meta-learning. Our work is the first to tackle the impact of imbalanced ratings in cold-start sequential recommendation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T15:18:42Z)
• Top-N Recommendation with Counterfactual User Preference Simulation [26.597102553608348]
  Top-N recommendation, which aims to learn user ranking-based preference, has long been a fundamental problem in a wide range of applications. In this paper, we propose to reformulate the recommendation task within the causal inference framework to handle the data scarce problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T14:28:46Z)
• Information Directed Reward Learning for Reinforcement Learning [64.33774245655401]
  We learn a model of the reward function that allows standard RL algorithms to achieve high expected return with as few expert queries as possible. In contrast to prior active reward learning methods designed for specific types of queries, IDRL naturally accommodates different query types. We support our findings with extensive evaluations in multiple environments and with different types of queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T18:46:42Z)
• Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systems [77.38665506495553]
  We propose self-supervised reinforcement learning for sequential recommendation tasks. Our approach augments standard recommendation models with two output layers: one for self-supervised learning and the other for RL. Based on such an approach, we propose two frameworks namely Self-Supervised Q-learning(SQN) and Self-Supervised Actor-Critic(SAC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T11:18:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.