Large Language Model-Based Automatic Formulation for Stochastic Optimization Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17200v1
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 03:31:25 GMT
- Title: Large Language Model-Based Automatic Formulation for Stochastic Optimization Models
- Authors: Amirreza Talebi,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents the first integrated systematic study on the performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>We design several prompts that guide ChatGPT through structured tasks using chain-of- thought and modular reasoning.<n>Across a diverse set of problems, GPT-4-Turbo outperforms other models in partial score, variable matching, objective accuracy, with cot_s_instructions emerging as the most effective prompting strategies.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents the first integrated systematic study on the performance of large language models (LLMs), specifically ChatGPT, to automatically formulate and solve stochastic optimiza- tion problems from natural language descriptions. Focusing on three key categories, joint chance- constrained models, individual chance-constrained models, and two-stage stochastic linear programs (SLP-2), we design several prompts that guide ChatGPT through structured tasks using chain-of- thought and modular reasoning. We introduce a novel soft scoring metric that evaluates the struc- tural quality and partial correctness of generated models, addressing the limitations of canonical and execution-based accuracy. Across a diverse set of stochastic problems, GPT-4-Turbo outperforms other models in partial score, variable matching, and objective accuracy, with cot_s_instructions and agentic emerging as the most effective prompting strategies. Our findings reveal that with well-engineered prompts and multi-agent collaboration, LLMs can facilitate specially stochastic formulations, paving the way for intelligent, language-driven modeling pipelines in stochastic opti- mization.
Related papers
- D-Models and E-Models: Diversity-Stability Trade-offs in the Sampling Behavior of Large Language Models [91.21455683212224]
In large language models (LLMs), the probability of relevance for the next piece of information is linked to the probability of relevance for the next product.<n>But whether fine-grained sampling probabilities faithfully align with task requirements remains an open question.<n>We identify two model types: D-models, whose P_token exhibits large step-to-step variability and poor alignment with P_task; and E-models, whose P_token is more stable and better aligned with P_task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T14:59:09Z) - Automated Optimization Modeling via a Localizable Error-Driven Perspective [20.591721861026414]
We propose a novel error-driven learning framework for automated optimization modeling.<n>MIND customized the whole model training framework from data synthesis to post-training.<n>MIND consistently outperforms all the state-of-the-art automated optimization modeling approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-17T09:59:01Z) - Dual-Phase LLM Reasoning: Self-Evolved Mathematical Frameworks [48.105258051884384]
This paper proposes a new two-stage training framework that enhances models' self-correction capabilities.<n>During the first stage, a multi-turn dialogue strategy guides the model to generate long chain-of-thought (CoT) data.<n>The second stage employs a difficulty-aware rejection sampling mechanism to dynamically optimize data distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-09T08:19:11Z) - Offline Multi-Task Multi-Objective Data-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm with Language Surrogate Model and Implicit Q-Learning [16.52427396199173]
We propose Q-MetaSur as a plug-and-play surrogate modeling scheme.<n>We consider multi-task-multi-objective optimization(MTMOO) in offline setting.<n>We show that Q-MetaSur outperforms representative surrogate baselines in objective approximation accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T07:30:11Z) - Multimodal Large Language Models with Adaptive Preference Optimization for Sequential Recommendation [60.33386541343322]
We propose a Multimodal Large Language Models framework that integrates Hardness-aware and Noise-regularized preference optimization for Recommendation (HaNoRec)<n>Specifically, HaNoRec dynamically adjusts optimization weights based on both the estimated hardness of each training sample and the policy model's real-time responsiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-24T04:10:46Z) - When Words Change the Model: Sensitivity of LLMs for Constraint Programming Modelling [1.052782170493037]
Large language models show impressive results in automatically generating models for classical benchmarks.<n>Many standard CP problems are likely included in the training data of these models.<n>We show that while LLMs can produce syntactically valid and semantically plausible models, their performance drops sharply under contextual and linguistic variation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-18T10:40:32Z) - SPARE: Single-Pass Annotation with Reference-Guided Evaluation for Automatic Process Supervision and Reward Modelling [58.05959902776133]
We introduce Single-Pass.<n>with Reference-Guided Evaluation (SPARE), a novel structured framework that enables efficient per-step annotation.<n>We demonstrate SPARE's effectiveness across four diverse datasets spanning mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, MATH), multi-hop question answering (MuSiQue-Ans), and spatial reasoning (SpaRP)<n>On ProcessBench, SPARE demonstrates data-efficient out-of-distribution generalization, using only $sim$16% of training samples compared to human-labeled and other synthetically trained baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-18T14:37:59Z) - Self-Steering Language Models [113.96916935955842]
DisCIPL is a method for "self-steering" language models (LMs)<n>DisCIPL generates a task-specific inference program that is executed by a population of Follower models.<n>Our work opens up a design space of highly-parallelized Monte Carlo inference strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-09T17:54:22Z) - DFPE: A Diverse Fingerprint Ensemble for Enhancing LLM Performance [11.753349115726952]
We propose a novel ensemble method - Diverse Fingerprint Ensemble (DFPE)<n>Our approach involves: (1) clustering models based on response "fingerprints" patterns, (2) applying a quantile-based filtering mechanism, and (3) assigning adaptive weights to remaining models.<n>In experiments on the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark, DFPE outperforms the best single model by 3% overall accuracy and 5% in discipline-level accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-29T08:44:45Z) - Effective Demonstration Annotation for In-Context Learning via Language Model-Based Determinantal Point Process [45.632012199451275]
In-context learning (ICL) is a few-shot learning paradigm that involves learning mappings through input-output pairs.
Existing works are highly dependent on large-scale labeled support sets, not always feasible in practical scenarios.
We introduce the Language Model-based Determinant Point Process (LM-DPP) that simultaneously considers the uncertainty and diversity of unlabeled instances for optimal selection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-04T18:08:15Z) - Mixture-of-Instructions: Aligning Large Language Models via Mixture Prompting [7.103987978402038]
We introduce a novel technique termed Mixture-of-Instructions (MoI)<n>MoI employs a strategy of instruction packing combined with diverse system prompts to boost the alignment efficiency of language models.<n>Our methodology was applied to the open-source Qwen-7B-chat model, culminating in the development of Qwen-SFT-MoI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T03:58:12Z) - Sample Complexity Characterization for Linear Contextual MDPs [67.79455646673762]
Contextual decision processes (CMDPs) describe a class of reinforcement learning problems in which the transition kernels and reward functions can change over time with different MDPs indexed by a context variable.
CMDPs serve as an important framework to model many real-world applications with time-varying environments.
We study CMDPs under two linear function approximation models: Model I with context-varying representations and common linear weights for all contexts; and Model II with common representations for all contexts and context-varying linear weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T03:25:04Z) - Mixture-of-Linguistic-Experts Adapters for Improving and Interpreting
Pre-trained Language Models [22.977852629450346]
We propose a method that combines two popular research areas by injecting linguistic structures into pre-trained language models.
In our approach, parallel adapter modules encoding different linguistic structures are combined using a novel Mixture-of-Linguistic-Experts architecture.
Our experiment results show that our approach can outperform state-of-the-art PEFT methods with a comparable number of parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T23:29:06Z) - Guiding Language Model Reasoning with Planning Tokens [122.43639723387516]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently attracted considerable interest for their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks.
We propose a hierarchical generation scheme to encourage a more structural generation of chain-of-thought steps.
Our approach requires a negligible increase in trainable parameters (0.001%) and can be applied through either full fine-tuning or a more parameter-efficient scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T13:29:37Z) - Discover, Explanation, Improvement: An Automatic Slice Detection
Framework for Natural Language Processing [72.14557106085284]
slice detection models (SDM) automatically identify underperforming groups of datapoints.
This paper proposes a benchmark named "Discover, Explain, improve (DEIM)" for classification NLP tasks.
Our evaluation shows that Edisa can accurately select error-prone datapoints with informative semantic features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-08T19:00:00Z) - Bayesian Prompt Learning for Image-Language Model Generalization [64.50204877434878]
We use the regularization ability of Bayesian methods to frame prompt learning as a variational inference problem.
Our approach regularizes the prompt space, reduces overfitting to the seen prompts and improves the prompt generalization on unseen prompts.
We demonstrate empirically on 15 benchmarks that Bayesian prompt learning provides an appropriate coverage of the prompt space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-05T17:05:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.