The AI in the Mirror: LLM Self-Recognition in an Iterated Public Goods Game

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18467v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:35:03 GMT
• Title: The AI in the Mirror: LLM Self-Recognition in an Iterated Public Goods Game
• Authors: Olivia Long, Carter Teplica,
• Abstract summary: We analyze the behavior of four reasoning and non-reasoning models across two conditions.<n>We find that, across different settings, telling LLMs that they are playing against themselves significantly changes their tendency to cooperate.<n>While our study is conducted in a toy environment, our results may provide insights into multi-agent settings where agents "unconsciously" discriminating against each other could inexplicably increase or decrease cooperation.
• Score: 0.8594140167290097
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As AI agents become increasingly capable of tool use and long-horizon tasks, they have begun to be deployed in settings where multiple agents can interact. However, whereas prior work has mostly focused on human-AI interactions, there is an increasing need to understand AI-AI interactions. In this paper, we adapt the iterated public goods game, a classic behavioral economics game, to analyze the behavior of four reasoning and non-reasoning models across two conditions: models are either told they are playing against "another AI agent" or told their opponents are themselves. We find that, across different settings, telling LLMs that they are playing against themselves significantly changes their tendency to cooperate. While our study is conducted in a toy environment, our results may provide insights into multi-agent settings where agents "unconsciously" discriminating against each other could inexplicably increase or decrease cooperation.

Related papers

• Social Cooperation in Conversational AI Agents [17.015143707851358]
  We argue that these challenges can be overcome by explicitly modeling humans' social intelligence.<n>By mathematically modeling the strategies humans use to communicate and reason about one another over long periods of time, we may be able to derive new game theoretic objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T13:02:36Z)
• FAIRGAME: a Framework for AI Agents Bias Recognition using Game Theory [51.96049148869987]
  We present FAIRGAME, a Framework for AI Agents Bias Recognition using Game Theory.<n>We describe its implementation and usage, and we employ it to uncover biased outcomes in popular games among AI agents.<n>Overall, FAIRGAME allows users to reliably and easily simulate their desired games and scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-19T15:29:04Z)
• Promoting Cooperation in the Public Goods Game using Artificial Intelligent Agents [0.0]
  Using a computational evolutionary model, we find that only when AI agents mimic player behavior does the critical synergy threshold for cooperation decrease.<n>This suggests that we can leverage AI to promote collective well-being in societal dilemmas by designing AI agents to mimic human players.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T22:16:21Z)
• Toward Human-AI Alignment in Large-Scale Multi-Player Games [24.784173202415687]
  We analyze extensive human gameplay data from Xbox's Bleeding Edge (100K+ games) We find that while human players exhibit variability in fight-flight and explore-exploit behavior, AI players tend towards uniformity. These stark differences underscore the need for interpretable evaluation, design, and integration of AI in human-aligned applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T22:55:33Z)
• The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey [91.71061158000953]
  Large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents. We explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T17:12:03Z)
• Improving Language Model Negotiation with Self-Play and In-Context Learning from AI Feedback [97.54519989641388]
  We study whether multiple large language models (LLMs) can autonomously improve each other in a negotiation game by playing, reflecting, and criticizing. Only a subset of the language models we consider can self-play and improve the deal price from AI feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T11:55:32Z)
• Incorporating Rivalry in Reinforcement Learning for a Competitive Game [65.2200847818153]
  This work proposes a novel reinforcement learning mechanism based on the social impact of rivalry behavior. Our proposed model aggregates objective and social perception mechanisms to derive a rivalry score that is used to modulate the learning of artificial agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-22T14:06:06Z)
• Cooperative Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  We argue that there is a need for research on the intersection between game theory and artificial intelligence. We discuss the problem of how an external agent can promote cooperation between artificial learners. We show that the resulting cooperative outcome is stable in certain games even if the planning agent is turned off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-20T16:50:37Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Learning Latent Representations to Influence Multi-Agent Interaction [65.44092264843538]
  We propose a reinforcement learning-based framework for learning latent representations of an agent's policy. We show that our approach outperforms the alternatives and learns to influence the other agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-12T19:04:26Z)
• Real-World Human-Robot Collaborative Reinforcement Learning [6.089774484591287]
  We present a real-world setup of a human-robot collaborative maze game, designed to be non-trivial and only solvable through collaboration. We use deep reinforcement learning for the control of the robotic agent, and achieve results within 30 minutes of real-world play. We present results on how co-policy learning occurs over time between the human and the robotic agent resulting in each participant's agent serving as a representation of how they would play the game.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T19:34:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.