HEAL: A Hypothesis-Based Preference-Aware Analysis Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.19922v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:30:08 GMT
• Title: HEAL: A Hypothesis-Based Preference-Aware Analysis Framework
• Authors: Yifu Huo, Chenglong Wang, Qiren Zhu, Shunjie Xing, Tong Xiao, Chunliang Zhang, Tongran Liu, Jinbo Zhu,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a textbfHypothesis-based PrtextbfEference-aware textbfAnatextbfLysis Framework (HEAL)<n>It formulates preference alignment as a re-ranking process within hypothesis spaces.<n>The framework incorporates two complementary metrics: ranking accuracy for evaluating ordinal consistency and preference strength correlation for assessing continuous alignment.
• Score: 32.45006553398745
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Preference optimization methods like DPO have achieved remarkable performance in LLM alignment. However, the evaluation for these methods relies on a single response and overlooks other potential outputs, which could also be generated in real-world applications within this hypothetical space. To address this issue, this paper presents a \textbf{H}ypothesis-based Pr\textbf{E}ference-aware \textbf{A}na\textbf{L}ysis Framework (HEAL), a novel evaluation paradigm that formulates preference alignment as a re-ranking process within hypothesis spaces. The framework incorporates two complementary metrics: ranking accuracy for evaluating ordinal consistency and preference strength correlation for assessing continuous alignment. To facilitate this framework, we develop UniHypoBench, a unified hypothesis benchmark constructed from diverse instruction-response pairs. Through extensive experiments based on HEAL, with a particular focus on the intrinsic mechanisms of preference learning, we demonstrate that current preference learning methods can effectively capture preferences provided by proxy models while simultaneously suppressing negative samples. These findings contribute to preference learning research through two significant avenues. Theoretically, we introduce hypothesis space analysis as an innovative paradigm for understanding preference alignment. Practically, HEAL offers researchers robust diagnostic tools for refining preference optimization methods, while our empirical results identify promising directions for developing more advanced alignment algorithms capable of comprehensive preference capture.

Related papers

• How Sampling Shapes LLM Alignment: From One-Shot Optima to Iterative Dynamics [65.67654005892469]
  We show that proper instance-dependent sampling can yield stronger ranking guarantees, while skewed on-policy sampling can induce excessive concentration under structured preferences.<n>We then analyze iterative alignment dynamics in which the learned policy feeds back into future sampling and reference policies.<n>Our theoretical insights extend to Direct Preference Optimization, indicating the phenomena we captured are common to a broader class of preference-alignment methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T17:11:08Z)
• Efficient Thought Space Exploration through Strategic Intervention [54.35208611253168]
  We propose a novel Hint-Practice Reasoning (HPR) framework that operationalizes this insight through two synergistic components.<n>The framework's core innovation lies in Distributional Inconsistency Reduction (DIR), which dynamically identifies intervention points.<n> Experiments across arithmetic and commonsense reasoning benchmarks demonstrate HPR's state-of-the-art efficiency-accuracy tradeoffs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T07:26:01Z)
• Doubly-Robust Estimation of Counterfactual Policy Mean Embeddings [24.07815507403025]
  Estimating the distribution of outcomes under counterfactual policies is critical for decision-making in domains such as recommendation, advertising, and healthcare.<n>We analyze a novel framework-Counterfactual Policy Mean Embedding (CPME)-that represents the entire counterfactual outcome distribution in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T12:16:46Z)
• Proximalized Preference Optimization for Diverse Feedback Types: A Decomposed Perspective on DPO [19.5712961932773]
  We revisit direct preference optimization (DPO) and demonstrate that its loss theoretically admits a decomposed reformulation.<n>We introduce PRoximalized PReference Optimization (PRO), a unified method to align with diverse feeback types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T10:23:22Z)
• MOOSE-Chem3: Toward Experiment-Guided Hypothesis Ranking via Simulated Experimental Feedback [136.27567671480156]
  We introduce experiment-guided ranking, which prioritizes hypotheses based on feedback from prior tests.<n>We frame experiment-guided ranking as a sequential decision-making problem.<n>Our approach significantly outperforms pre-experiment baselines and strong ablations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T13:24:50Z)
• A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization [103.59317151002693]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented generative capabilities.<n>Their alignment with human values remains critical for ensuring helpful and harmless deployments.<n>Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently gained prominence as a streamlined alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T08:45:15Z)
• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• $i$REPO: $i$mplicit Reward Pairwise Difference based Empirical Preference Optimization [12.266207199002604]
  Large Language Models (LLM) can sometimes produce outputs that deviate from human expectations. We propose a novel framework named $i$REPO, which utilizes implicit Reward pairwise difference regression for Empirical Preference Optimization. We show that $i$REPO effectively achieves self-alignment using soft-label, self-generated responses and the logit of empirical AI annotators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T05:42:11Z)
• Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Hypothesis Consolidation of Prediction Rationale [53.152460508207184]
  Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (SFUDA) is a challenging task where a model needs to be adapted to a new domain without access to target domain labels or source domain data. This paper proposes a novel approach that considers multiple prediction hypotheses for each sample and investigates the rationale behind each hypothesis. To achieve the optimal performance, we propose a three-step adaptation process: model pre-adaptation, hypothesis consolidation, and semi-supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T05:53:22Z)
• Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint [56.74058752955209]
  This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. We propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T18:58:42Z)
• PARL: A Unified Framework for Policy Alignment in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [106.63518036538163]
  We present a novel unified bilevel optimization-based framework, textsfPARL, formulated to address the recently highlighted critical issue of policy alignment in reinforcement learning. Our framework addressed these concerns by explicitly parameterizing the distribution of the upper alignment objective (reward design) by the lower optimal variable. Our empirical results substantiate that the proposed textsfPARL can address the alignment concerns in RL by showing significant improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T18:03:44Z)
• An Operational Perspective to Fairness Interventions: Where and How to Intervene [9.833760837977222]
  We present a holistic framework for evaluating and contextualizing fairness interventions. We demonstrate our framework with a case study on predictive parity. We find predictive parity is difficult to achieve without using group data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T07:04:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.