RelAItionship Building: Analyzing Recruitment Strategies for Participatory AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20176v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 18:00:46 GMT
• Title: RelAItionship Building: Analyzing Recruitment Strategies for Participatory AI
• Authors: Eugene Kim, Vaibhav Balloli, Berelian Karimian, Elizabeth Bondi-Kelly, Benjamin Fish,
• Abstract summary: We investigate the challenges that researchers face when designing and executing recruitment methodology for Participatory AI projects.<n>We describe the recruitment methodologies used in AI projects using a corpus of 37 projects to capture the diversity of practices in the field and perform an initial analysis on the documentation of recruitment practices.<n>We find that these outcomes are shaped by structural conditions of their work, researchers' own goals and expectations, and the relationships built from the recruitment methodology and subsequent collaboration.
• Score: 7.603490843138366
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Participatory AI, in which impacted community members and other stakeholders are involved in the design and development of AI systems, holds promise as a way to ensure AI is developed to meet their needs and reflect their values. However, the process of identifying, reaching out, and engaging with all relevant stakeholder groups, which we refer to as recruitment methodology, is still a practical challenge in AI projects striving to adopt participatory practices. In this paper, we investigate the challenges that researchers face when designing and executing recruitment methodology for Participatory AI projects, and the implications of current recruitment practice for Participatory AI. First, we describe the recruitment methodologies used in AI projects using a corpus of 37 projects to capture the diversity of practices in the field and perform an initial analysis on the documentation of recruitment practices, as well as specific strategies that researchers use to meet goals of equity and empowerment. To complement this analysis, we interview five AI researchers to learn about the outcomes of recruitment methodologies. We find that these outcomes are shaped by structural conditions of their work, researchers' own goals and expectations, and the relationships built from the recruitment methodology and subsequent collaboration. Based on these analyses, we provide recommendations for designing and executing relationship-forward recruitment methods, as well as reflexive recruitment documentation practices for Participatory AI researchers.

Related papers

• Understanding Ethical Practices in AI: Insights from a Cross-Role, Cross-Region Survey of AI Development Teams [1.5020330976600738]
  Recent advances in AI applications have raised growing concerns about the need for ethical guidelines and regulations to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies.<n>We present a mixed-method survey study to examine the ethical perceptions, practices, and knowledge of individuals involved in various AI development roles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T19:07:20Z)
• Operationalizing AI for Good: Spotlight on Deployment and Integration of AI Models in Humanitarian Work [52.96150571365764]
  We share details about the close collaboration with a humanitarian-to-humanitarian (H2H) organization.<n>We discuss how to deploy the AI model in a resource-constrained environment, and how to maintain it for continuous performance updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:30:38Z)
• Designing Conversational AI to Support Think-Aloud Practice in Technical Interview Preparation for CS Students [8.444343781409207]
  We conducted a study with 17 participants using an LLM-based technical interview practice tool.<n>Key design recommendations include promoting social presence in conversational AI for technical interview simulation.<n>We examined broader considerations, including intersectional challenges and potential strategies to address them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T00:15:05Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labs [0.17205106391379024]
  There is a dearth of evidence on attitudes to and approaches for participation in the sites driving major AI developments. This paper explores how commercial AI labs understand participatory AI approaches and the obstacles they have faced implementing these practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T14:34:28Z)
• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
  We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
• Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir" [76.44130385507894]
  This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices. Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.