Conflict in Community-Based Design: A Case Study of a Relationship Breakdown

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21308v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 02:11:19 GMT
• Title: Conflict in Community-Based Design: A Case Study of a Relationship Breakdown
• Abstract summary: We reflect on our two-year-long engagement with a non-profit organization in southern India.<n>During design, we encountered practices that upheld caste hierarchies.<n>We outline pluralistic pathways that community-based designers might inhabit when navigating value conflicts.
• Score: 0.8283940114367679
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Community-based design efforts rightly seek to reduce the power differences between researchers and community participants by aligning with community values and furthering their priorities. However, what should designers do when key community members' practices seem to enact an oppressive and harmful structure? We reflect on our two-year-long engagement with a non-profit organization in southern India that supports women subjected to domestic abuse or facing mental health crises. We highlight the organizational gaps in knowledge management and transfer, which became an avenue for our design intervention. During design, we encountered practices that upheld caste hierarchies. These practices were expected to be incorporated into our technology. Anticipating harms to indirect stakeholders, we resisted this incorporation. It led to a breakdown in our relationship with the partner organization. Reflecting on this experience, we outline pluralistic pathways that community-based designers might inhabit when navigating value conflicts. These include making space for reflection before and during engagements, strategically repositioning through role reframing or appreciative inquiry, and exiting the engagement if necessary.

Related papers

• Epistemic Trust as a Mechanism for Ethics Integration: Failure Modes and Design Principles from 70 Moral Imagination Workshops [0.15686650621337614]
  Bottom-up responsible innovation initiatives seek to empower technology development teams to engage in ethical reflection.<n>Yet such initiatives frequently fail to achieve practitioner engagement.<n>This paper proposes a conceptual model linking intervention design to engagement outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T10:39:10Z)
• Impostor Phenomenon as Human Debt: A Challenge to the Future of Software Engineering [46.44607910934403]
  The Impostor Phenomenon (IP) impacts a significant portion of the Software Engineering workforce.<n>Similar to technical debt, Human Debt accumulates due to gaps in psychological safety and inclusive support within socio-technical ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-14T13:26:38Z)
• Ethics of Care for Software Engineering [51.80521257060489]
  We argue that the opposition of "caring about" and "caring for" is based on the ethics of care.<n>We advocate for the adoption of ethics of care in software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T20:16:00Z)
• Is It Safe To Learn And Share? On Psychological Safety and Social Learning in (Agile) Communities of Practice [4.662447283600293]
  Communities of Practice (CoPs) are increasingly adopted to support social learning beyond formal education.<n> psychological safety, a prerequisite for effective learning, remains insufficiently understood in these settings.<n>This study investigates psychological safety within Agile CoPs through survey data from 143 participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T19:06:43Z)
• CRAFT@Large: Building Community Through Co-Making [2.5569675122244475]
  CRAFT@Large is an initiative launched by the Maker at Cornell Tech to create an inclusive environment for the exchange of ideas through making. We challenge the traditional definition of community outreach performed by academic makerspaces. Existing academic makerspaces often perform community engagement by only offering hourly, one-time workshops or by having community members provide a problem that is then used by students as a project assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:26:32Z)
• Unified External Stakeholder Engagement and Requirements Strategy [3.199782544428545]
  This study proposes a framework for early stakeholder identification and continuous engagement throughout the project lifecycle. The framework addresses common organizational failures in stakeholder communication that lead to project delays and cancellations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-08T08:20:57Z)
• Fostering Inclusion: A Regional Initiative Uniting Communities to Co-Design Assistive Technologies [0.3374875022248865]
  The presented regional initiative strives to tackle these problems by bringing together people with disabilities, students, researchers, and associations. During different lecture formats at the university, students co-design assistive technologies with people with disabilities. We conducted and analyzed thirteen semi-structured interviews with participants and other involved stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T21:21:50Z)
• Rehearsal: Simulating Conflict to Teach Conflict Resolution [54.32934135393982]
  Rehearsal is a system that allows users to rehearse conflicts with a believable simulated interlocutor. Users can utilize Rehearsal to practice handling a variety of predefined conflict scenarios. Rehearsal uses IRP to generate utterances grounded in conflict resolution theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T17:59:20Z)
• Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness [55.037030060643126]
  Intersectionality is a critical framework that allows us to examine how social inequalities persist. We argue that adopting intersectionality as an analytical framework is pivotal to effectively operationalizing fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-16T21:02:09Z)
• "STILL AROUND": Experiences and Survival Strategies of Veteran Women Software Developers [53.5211430148752]
  We conducted 14 interviews to examine the experiences of people at the intersection of ageism and sexism. We identified 283 codes, which fell into three main categories: Strategies, Experiences, and Perception. Several strategies we identified, such as (Deliberately) Not Trying to Look Younger, were not previously described in the software engineering literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T19:26:15Z)
• Fragments of the Past: Curating Peer Support with Perpetrators of Domestic Violence [88.37416552778178]
  We report on a ten-month study where we worked with six support workers and eighteen perpetrators in the design and deployment of Fragments of the Past. We share how crafting digitally-augmented artefacts - 'fragments' - of experiences of desisting from violence can translate messages for motivation and rapport between peers. These insights provide the basis for practical considerations for future network design with challenging populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T22:57:43Z)
• Leveraging traditional ecological knowledge in ecosystem restoration projects utilizing machine learning [77.34726150561087]
  Community engagement throughout the stages of ecosystem restoration projects could contribute to improved community well-being. We suggest that adaptive and scalable practices could incentivize interdisciplinary collaboration during all stages of ecosystemic ML restoration projects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T16:17:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.