Ethics of Care for Software Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.16303v1
• Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 20:16:00 GMT
• Title: Ethics of Care for Software Engineering
• Abstract summary: We argue that the opposition of "caring about" and "caring for" is based on the ethics of care.<n>We advocate for the adoption of ethics of care in software engineering.
• Score: 51.80521257060489
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Software engineering researchers repeatedly argue that the impact of their research on industrial practice, while desired and intended, is rarely achieved. We believe that a possible explanation of this phenomenon is the opposition of "caring about" and "caring for", based on the ethics of care. Indeed, while software engineering is collaborative and hence builds on interpersonal relations, researchers tend to care about "industrial impact" and "practitioners" in abstract terms, but rarely care for specific individuals working in specific contexts facing specific challenges. In this position paper, we advocate for the adoption of ethics of care in software engineering and discuss the implications of this adoption for researchers and conference organizers.

Related papers

• Unrequited Emotions: Investigating the Gaps in Motivation and Practice in Speech Emotion Recognition Research [11.170150451606936]
  We conduct a systematic survey of speech emotion recognition (SER) research to uncover what stated motivations drive this work.<n>We find that while SER research identifies appealing goals, commonly-used datasets do not reflect these proposed deployment contexts.<n>We argue that such gaps engender ethical concerns, and that SER research should reassert itself with concrete use-cases to prevent misinterpretations, misuse, and downstream harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T15:43:35Z)
• Be a Partner, not a Bystander in Software Engineering Practice: Bridging the Gaps between Academia and Industry [1.6818254855155208]
  We argue that the software engineering community is deeply concerned about its research impact and relevance to industry practices.<n>We propose new calls for action and reforms in SE, and thus envision a new future for the software engineering community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T02:56:01Z)
• Who Speaks for Ethics? How Demographics Shape Ethical Advocacy in Software Development [3.504870208291045]
  This study investigates ethical concerns in software development, focusing on how they are perceived, prioritized, and addressed by demographically different practitioners.<n>Our findings reveal pronounced demographic disparities, with marginalized groups - including women, BIPOC, and disabled individuals - reporting ethical concerns at higher frequencies.<n>These insights underscore the urgent need for reforms in software education and development processes that center on diverse perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T14:43:57Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Ethics Pathways: A Design Activity for Reflecting on Ethics Engagement in HCI Research [18.426314819481576]
  Ethics Pathways offers a design approach to understanding the complexities of researchers' past ethics engagements in their work. This activity involves four main tasks: recalling ethical incidents; describing stakeholders involved in the situation; recounting their actions or speculative alternatives, and reflection and emotion walk-through.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T18:16:27Z)
• Responsible AI Considerations in Text Summarization Research: A Review of Current Practices [89.85174013619883]
  We focus on text summarization, a common NLP task largely overlooked by the responsible AI community. We conduct a multi-round qualitative analysis of 333 summarization papers from the ACL Anthology published between 2020-2022. We focus on how, which, and when responsible AI issues are covered, which relevant stakeholders are considered, and mismatches between stated and realized research goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T15:35:36Z)
• The Participatory Turn in AI Design: Theoretical Foundations and the Current State of Practice [64.29355073494125]
  This article aims to ground what we dub the "participatory turn" in AI design by synthesizing existing theoretical literature on participation. We articulate empirical findings concerning the current state of participatory practice in AI design based on an analysis of recently published research and semi-structured interviews with 12 AI researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T05:30:42Z)
• The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
  This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment. Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Case Study: Deontological Ethics in NLP [119.53038547411062]
  We study one ethical theory, namely deontological ethics, from the perspective of NLP. In particular, we focus on the generalization principle and the respect for autonomy through informed consent. We provide four case studies to demonstrate how these principles can be used with NLP systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T16:04:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.