The Collaborations among Healthcare Systems, Research Institutions, and Industry on Artificial Intelligence Research and Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00068v1
• Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 12:04:17 GMT
• Title: The Collaborations among Healthcare Systems, Research Institutions, and Industry on Artificial Intelligence Research and Development
• Authors: Jiancheng Ye, Michelle Ma, Malak Abuhashish,
• Abstract summary: The integration of Artificial Intelligence in healthcare promises to revolutionize patient care, diagnostics, and treatment protocols.<n>This study aims to characterize collaborative networks and stakeholders in AI healthcare initiatives.
• Score: 3.3505351631804046
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Objectives: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare promises to revolutionize patient care, diagnostics, and treatment protocols. Collaborative efforts among healthcare systems, research institutions, and industry are pivotal to leveraging AI's full potential. This study aims to characterize collaborative networks and stakeholders in AI healthcare initiatives, identify challenges and opportunities within these collaborations, and elucidate priorities for future AI research and development. Methods: This study utilized data from the Chinese Society of Radiology and the Chinese Medical Imaging AI Innovation Alliance. A national cross-sectional survey was conducted in China (N = 5,142) across 31 provincial administrative regions, involving participants from three key groups: clinicians, institution professionals, and industry representatives. The survey explored diverse aspects including current AI usage in healthcare, collaboration dynamics, challenges encountered, and research and development priorities. Results: Findings reveal high interest in AI among clinicians, with a significant gap between interest and actual engagement in development activities. Despite the willingness to share data, progress is hindered by concerns about data privacy and security, and lack of clear industry standards and legal guidelines. Future development interests focus on lesion screening, disease diagnosis, and enhancing clinical workflows. Conclusion: This study highlights an enthusiastic yet cautious approach toward AI in healthcare, characterized by significant barriers that impede effective collaboration and implementation. Recommendations emphasize the need for AI-specific education and training, secure data-sharing frameworks, establishment of clear industry standards, and formation of dedicated AI research departments.

Related papers

• The Patient/Industry Trade-off in Medical Artificial Intelligence [0.9219967191855128]
  We discuss three features of AI studies that hamper the integration of AI into clinical practice.<n>These include lack of clinically relevant metrics, lack of clinical trials and longitudinal studies to validate results, and lack of patient and physician involvement in the development process.<n>We propose three approaches for addressing this gap: improved transparency and explainability of AI models, fostering relationships with industry partners that have a reputation for centering patient benefit in their practices, and prioritization of overall healthcare benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T18:01:57Z)
• A Comprehensive Review of Datasets for Clinical Mental Health AI Systems [55.67299586253951]
  We present the first comprehensive survey of clinical mental health datasets relevant to the training and development of AI-powered clinical assistants.<n>Our survey identifies critical gaps such as a lack of longitudinal data, limited cultural and linguistic representation, inconsistent collection and annotation standards, and a lack of modalities in synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T13:42:35Z)
• From Screens to Scenes: A Survey of Embodied AI in Healthcare [31.183244202702983]
  "EmAI in healthcare" spans diverse fields such as algorithms, robotics, and biomedicine.<n>We provide a comprehensive overview of the "brain" of EmAI for healthcare, wherein we introduce AI algorithms for perception, actuation, planning, and memory.<n>We discuss the technical barriers and explore ethical considerations, offering a forward-looking perspective on the future of EmAI in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T16:35:52Z)
• Ethical Challenges and Evolving Strategies in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Clinical Practice [1.0301404234578682]
  We focus on five critical ethical concerns: justice and fairness, transparency, patient consent and confidentiality, accountability, and patient-centered and equitable care.<n>The paper explores how bias, lack of transparency, and challenges in maintaining patient trust can undermine the effectiveness and fairness of AI applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T00:52:22Z)
• Towards Next-Generation Medical Agent: How o1 is Reshaping Decision-Making in Medical Scenarios [46.729092855387165]
  We study the choice of the backbone LLM for medical AI agents, which is the foundation for the agent's overall reasoning and action generation.<n>Our findings demonstrate o1's ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency, paving the way for smarter, more responsive AI tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-16T18:19:53Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications: A Review [42.33274794442013]
  This article reviews recent research grounded in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)<n>It focuses on medical practices within the visual, audio, and multimodal perspectives.<n>We endeavour to categorise and synthesise these practices, aiming to provide support and guidance for future researchers and healthcare professionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T11:31:06Z)
• SoK: Security and Privacy Risks of Healthcare AI [15.655956766190256]
  The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into healthcare systems holds great promise for enhancing patient care.<n>However, it also exposes sensitive data and system integrity to potential cyberattacks.<n>Current security and privacy (S&P) research on healthcare AI is highly unbalanced in terms of healthcare deployment scenarios and threat models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T16:59:58Z)
• AI-Driven Healthcare: A Review on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias [4.9325218275489515]
  This review paper examines the integration of AI in healthcare, highlighting critical challenges related to bias and exploring strategies for mitigation.<n>We emphasize the necessity of diverse datasets, fairness-aware algorithms, and regulatory frameworks to ensure equitable healthcare delivery.<n>The paper concludes with recommendations for future research, advocating for interdisciplinary approaches, transparency in AI decision-making, and the development of innovative and inclusive AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T02:39:17Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare [73.78776682247187]
  Concerns have been raised about the technical, clinical, ethical and legal risks associated with medical AI. This work describes the FUTURE-AI guideline as the first international consensus framework for guiding the development and deployment of trustworthy AI tools in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T10:49:05Z)
• A Conceptual Algorithm for Applying Ethical Principles of AI to Medical Practice [5.005928809654619]
  AI-powered tools are increasingly matching or exceeding specialist-level performance across multiple domains.<n>These systems promise to reduce disparities in care delivery across demographic, racial, and socioeconomic boundaries.<n>The democratization of such AI tools can reduce the cost of care, optimize resource allocation, and improve the quality of care.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T04:14:18Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations. Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.