The Differential Meaning of Models: A Framework for Analyzing the Structural Consequences of Semantic Modeling Decisions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00248v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 21:28:10 GMT
• Title: The Differential Meaning of Models: A Framework for Analyzing the Structural Consequences of Semantic Modeling Decisions
• Authors: Zachary K. Stine, James E. Deitrick,
• Abstract summary: We argue that models measure latent symbol geometries, which can be understood as hypotheses about the complex of semiotic agencies underlying a symbolic dataset.<n>This forms the basis of a theory of model semantics in which models, and the modeling decisions that constitute them, are themselves treated as signs.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of methods for modeling of human meaning-making constitutes a powerful class of instruments for the analysis of complex semiotic systems. However, the field lacks a general theoretical framework for describing these modeling practices across various model types in an apples-to-apples way. In this paper, we propose such a framework grounded in the semiotic theory of C. S. Peirce. We argue that such models measure latent symbol geometries, which can be understood as hypotheses about the complex of semiotic agencies underlying a symbolic dataset. Further, we argue that in contexts where a model's value cannot be straightforwardly captured by proxy measures of performance, models can instead be understood relationally, so that the particular interpretive lens of a model becomes visible through its contrast with other models. This forms the basis of a theory of model semantics in which models, and the modeling decisions that constitute them, are themselves treated as signs. In addition to proposing the framework, we illustrate its empirical use with a few brief examples and consider foundational questions and future directions enabled by the framework.

Related papers

• From Black-box to Causal-box: Towards Building More Interpretable Models [57.23201263629627]
  We introduce the notion of causal interpretability, which formalizes when counterfactual queries can be evaluated from a specific class of models.<n>We derive a complete graphical criterion that determines whether a given model architecture supports a given counterfactual query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T20:03:18Z)
• Modeling Open-World Cognition as On-Demand Synthesis of Probabilistic Models [93.1043186636177]
  We explore the hypothesis that people use a combination of distributed and symbolic representations to construct bespoke mental models tailored to novel situations.<n>We propose a computational implementation of this idea -- a Model Synthesis Architecture''<n>We evaluate our MSA as a model of human judgments on a novel reasoning dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T18:01:03Z)
• The CoT Encyclopedia: Analyzing, Predicting, and Controlling how a Reasoning Model will Think [81.38614558541772]
  We introduce the CoT Encyclopedia, a framework for analyzing and steering model reasoning.<n>Our method automatically extracts diverse reasoning criteria from model-generated CoTs.<n>We show that this framework produces more interpretable and comprehensive analyses than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T11:31:02Z)
• Towards Compositional Interpretability for XAI [3.3768167170511587]
  We present an approach to defining AI models and their interpretability based on category theory. We compare a wide range of AI models as compositional models. We find that what makes the standard 'intrinsically interpretable' models so transparent is brought out most clearly diagrammatically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T14:27:03Z)
• Learning Discrete Concepts in Latent Hierarchical Models [73.01229236386148]
  Learning concepts from natural high-dimensional data holds potential in building human-aligned and interpretable machine learning models.<n>We formalize concepts as discrete latent causal variables that are related via a hierarchical causal model.<n>We substantiate our theoretical claims with synthetic data experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T18:01:03Z)
• Incorporating Domain Knowledge in Deep Neural Networks for Discrete Choice Models [0.5801044612920815]
  This paper proposes a framework that expands the potential of data-driven approaches for DCM. It includes pseudo data samples that represent required relationships and a loss function that measures their fulfillment. A case study demonstrates the potential of this framework for discrete choice analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T12:53:55Z)
• Minimal Value-Equivalent Partial Models for Scalable and Robust Planning in Lifelong Reinforcement Learning [56.50123642237106]
  Common practice in model-based reinforcement learning is to learn models that model every aspect of the agent's environment. We argue that such models are not particularly well-suited for performing scalable and robust planning in lifelong reinforcement learning scenarios. We propose new kinds of models that only model the relevant aspects of the environment, which we call "minimal value-minimal partial models"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-24T16:40:01Z)
• Geometric and Topological Inference for Deep Representations of Complex Networks [13.173307471333619]
  We present a class of statistics that emphasize the topology as well as the geometry of representations. We evaluate these statistics in terms of the sensitivity and specificity that they afford when used for model selection. These new methods enable brain and computer scientists to visualize the dynamic representational transformations learned by brains and models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T17:14:14Z)
• On generative models as the basis for digital twins [0.0]
  A framework is proposed for generative models as a basis for digital twins or mirrors of structures. The proposal is based on the premise that deterministic models cannot account for the uncertainty present in most structural modelling applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T20:34:56Z)
• An Ample Approach to Data and Modeling [1.0152838128195467]
  We describe a framework for modeling how models can be built that integrates concepts and methods from a wide range of fields. The reference M* meta model framework is presented, which relies critically in associating whole datasets and respective models in terms of a strict equivalence relation. Several considerations about how the developed framework can provide insights about data clustering, complexity, collaborative research, deep learning, and creativity are then presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T01:26:09Z)
• Model-agnostic multi-objective approach for the evolutionary discovery of mathematical models [55.41644538483948]
  In modern data science, it is more interesting to understand the properties of the model, which parts could be replaced to obtain better results. We use multi-objective evolutionary optimization for composite data-driven model learning to obtain the algorithm's desired properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T11:17:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.