Effects of Distributional Biases on Gradient-Based Causal Discovery in the Bivariate Categorical Case

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01621v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2025 17:08:03 GMT
• Title: Effects of Distributional Biases on Gradient-Based Causal Discovery in the Bivariate Categorical Case
• Authors: Tim Schwabe, Moritz Lange, Laurenz Wiskott, Maribel Acosta,
• Abstract summary: We show that gradient-based causal discovery can be susceptible to distributional biases in the data they are trained on.<n>We employ two simple models that derive causal factorizations by learning marginal or conditional data distributions.<n>An empirical evaluation of two related approaches indicates that eliminating competition between possible causal factorizations can make models robust to the presented biases.
• Score: 0.4339839287869652
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Gradient-based causal discovery shows great potential for deducing causal structure from data in an efficient and scalable way. Those approaches however can be susceptible to distributional biases in the data they are trained on. We identify two such biases: Marginal Distribution Asymmetry, where differences in entropy skew causal learning toward certain factorizations, and Marginal Distribution Shift Asymmetry, where repeated interventions cause faster shifts in some variables than in others. For the bivariate categorical setup with Dirichlet priors, we illustrate how these biases can occur even in controlled synthetic data. To examine their impact on gradient-based methods, we employ two simple models that derive causal factorizations by learning marginal or conditional data distributions - a common strategy in gradient-based causal discovery. We demonstrate how these models can be susceptible to both biases. We additionally show how the biases can be controlled. An empirical evaluation of two related, existing approaches indicates that eliminating competition between possible causal factorizations can make models robust to the presented biases.

Related papers

• Moment Matters: Mean and Variance Causal Graph Discovery from Heteroscedastic Observational Data [2.436681150766912]
  Heteroscedasticity -- where the variance of a variable changes with other variables -- is pervasive in real data.<n>Standard causal discovery does not reveal which causes act on the mean versus the variance, as it returns a single moment-agnostic graph.<n>We propose a Bayesian, moment-driven causal discovery framework that infers separate textitmean and textit variance causal graphs from observational heteroscedastic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T02:13:03Z)
• Causal Graph Learning via Distributional Invariance of Cause-Effect Relationship [54.575090553659074]
  We develop an algorithm that efficiently uncovers causal relationships with quadratic complexity in the number of observational variables.<n>Our experiments on a varied benchmark of large-scale datasets show superior or equivalent performance compared to existing works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T10:26:16Z)
• Identifiable Latent Neural Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning seeks to uncover latent, high-level causal representations from low-level observed data. We determine the types of distribution shifts that do contribute to the identifiability of causal representations. We translate our findings into a practical algorithm, allowing for the acquisition of reliable latent causal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T04:13:55Z)
• Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Change [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning aims to unveil latent high-level causal representations from observed low-level data.<n>One of its primary tasks is to provide reliable assurance of identifying these latent causal models, known as identifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T07:46:10Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Towards Causal Representation Learning and Deconfounding from Indefinite Data [17.793702165499298]
  Non-statistical data (e.g., images, text, etc.) encounters significant conflicts in terms of properties and methods with traditional causal data. We redefine causal data from two novel perspectives and then propose three data paradigms. We implement the above designs as a dynamic variational inference model, tailored to learn causal representation from indefinite data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T08:20:37Z)
• Identifying Weight-Variant Latent Causal Models [82.14087963690561]
  We find that transitivity acts as a key role in impeding the identifiability of latent causal representations. Under some mild assumptions, we can show that the latent causal representations can be identified up to trivial permutation and scaling. We propose a novel method, termed Structural caUsAl Variational autoEncoder, which directly learns latent causal representations and causal relationships among them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T11:12:59Z)
• Causal Discovery in Heterogeneous Environments Under the Sparse Mechanism Shift Hypothesis [7.895866278697778]
  Machine learning approaches commonly rely on the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data. In reality, this assumption is almost always violated due to distribution shifts between environments. We propose the Mechanism Shift Score (MSS), a score-based approach amenable to various empirical estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T15:39:30Z)
• Estimation of Bivariate Structural Causal Models by Variational Gaussian Process Regression Under Likelihoods Parametrised by Normalising Flows [74.85071867225533]
  Causal mechanisms can be described by structural causal models. One major drawback of state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is its lack of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T14:52:58Z)
• Causal Autoregressive Flows [4.731404257629232]
  We highlight an intrinsic correspondence between a simple family of autoregressive normalizing flows and identifiable causal models. We exploit the fact that autoregressive flow architectures define an ordering over variables, analogous to a causal ordering, to show that they are well-suited to performing a range of causal inference tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T13:17:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.