Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02624v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2025 13:38:50 GMT
• Title: Who Owns The Robot?: Four Ethical and Socio-technical Questions about Wellbeing Robots in the Real World through Community Engagement
• Authors: Minja Axelsson, Jiaee Cheong, Rune Nyrup, Hatice Gunes,
• Abstract summary: We undertake a community-centered investigation to examine three different communities' perspectives on using robotic wellbeing coaches in real-world environments.<n>We conducted workshops with three communities who are under-represented in robotics development.<n>We identify four themes regarding key ethical and socio-technical questions about the real-world use of wellbeing robots.
• Score: 9.005689230245432
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent studies indicate that robotic coaches can play a crucial role in promoting wellbeing. However, the real-world deployment of wellbeing robots raises numerous ethical and socio-technical questions and concerns. To explore these questions, we undertake a community-centered investigation to examine three different communities' perspectives on using robotic wellbeing coaches in real-world environments. We frame our work as an anticipatory ethical investigation, which we undertake to better inform the development of robotic technologies with communities' opinions, with the ultimate goal of aligning robot development with public interest. We conducted workshops with three communities who are under-represented in robotics development: 1) members of the public at a science festival, 2) women computer scientists at a conference, and 3) humanities researchers interested in history and philosophy of science. In the workshops, we collected qualitative data using the Social Robot Co-Design Canvas on Ethics. We analysed the collected qualitative data with Thematic Analysis, informed by notes taken during workshops. Through our analysis, we identify four themes regarding key ethical and socio-technical questions about the real-world use of wellbeing robots. We group participants' insights and discussions around these broad thematic questions, discuss them in light of state-of-the-art literature, and highlight areas for future investigation. Finally, we provide the four questions as a broad framework that roboticists can and should use during robotic development and deployment, in order to reflect on the ethics and socio-technical dimensions of their robotic applications, and to engage in dialogue with communities of robot users. The four questions are: 1) Is the robot safe and how can we know that?, 2) Who is the robot built for and with?, 3) Who owns the robot and the data?, and 4) Why a robot?.

Related papers

• What Questions Should Robots Be Able to Answer? A Dataset of User Questions for Explainable Robotics [6.292766967410994]
  We introduce a dataset of 1,893 user questions for household robots.<n>Most work in explainable robotics focuses on why-questions.<n>We find that users who identify as novices in robotics ask different questions than more experienced users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-18T10:16:45Z)
• A roadmap for AI in robotics [55.87087746398059]
  We are witnessing growing excitement in robotics at the prospect of leveraging the potential of AI to tackle some of the outstanding barriers to the full deployment of robots in our daily lives.<n>This article offers an assessment of what AI for robotics has achieved since the 1990s and proposes a short- and medium-term research roadmap listing challenges and promises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T15:18:28Z)
• Existential Crisis: A Social Robot's Reason for Being [0.0]
  This study aims to investigate how the user perception of robots is influenced by displays of personality.<n>Using LLMs and speech to text technology, we designed a within-subject study to compare two conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T20:30:15Z)
• Generalizable Humanoid Manipulation with 3D Diffusion Policies [66.78220965526732]
  We build a real-world robotic system to address the problem of autonomous manipulation by humanoid robots.<n>Our system is mainly an integration of 1) a whole-upper-body robotic teleoperation system to acquire human-like robot data, and 2) a 25-DoF humanoid robot platform with a height-adjustable cart and a 3D LiDAR sensor.<n>We show that using only data collected in one scene and with only onboard computing, a full-sized humanoid robot can autonomously perform skills in diverse real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:59:00Z)
• Robotics Meets Software Engineering: A First Look at the Robotics Discussions on Stackoverflow [0.0]
  This study seeks to identify the challenges encountered by robot developers by analyzing questions posted on StackOverflow. We created a filtered dataset of 500 robotics-related questions and examined their characteristics. We identified 11 major themes, with questions about robot movement being the most frequent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T23:03:56Z)
• Dialogue with Robots: Proposals for Broadening Participation and Research in the SLIVAR Community [57.56212633174706]
  The ability to interact with machines using natural human language is becoming commonplace, but expected. In this paper, we chronicle the recent history of this growing field of spoken dialogue with robots. We offer the community three proposals, the first focused on education, the second on benchmarks, and the third on the modeling of language when it comes to spoken interaction with robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T15:03:27Z)
• Human-Robot Interaction and Perceived Irrationality: A Study of Trust Dynamics and Error Acknowledgment [0.0]
  This study systematically examines trust dynamics and system design by analyzing human reactions to robot failures.<n>We conducted a four-stage survey to explore how trust evolves throughout human-robot interactions.<n>Results indicate that trust in robotic systems significantly increased when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T11:00:11Z)
• Asch Meets HRI: Human Conformity to Robot Groups [0.9350546589421261]
  We present a research outline that aims at investigating group dynamics and peer pressure in the context of industrial robots. We are interested in highlighting the effects of group size, perceived robot credibility, psychological stress, and peer pressure in the context of industrial robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T11:14:24Z)
• The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [64.77385130665128]
  The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots. We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T11:12:45Z)
• Robotic Speech Synthesis: Perspectives on Interactions, Scenarios, and Ethics [2.6959411243976175]
  We discuss the difficulties of synthesizing non-verbal and interaction-oriented speech signals, particularly backchannels. We present the findings of relevant literature and our prior work, trying to bring the attention of human-robot interaction researchers to design better conversational robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T20:24:17Z)
• The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [65.60507052509406]
  The aim of this workshop is to give researchers from academia and industry the possibility to discuss the inter-and multi-disciplinary nature of the relationships between people and robots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T16:52:12Z)
• Semantics for Robotic Mapping, Perception and Interaction: A Survey [93.93587844202534]
  Study of understanding dictates what does the world "mean" to a robot. With humans and robots increasingly operating in the same world, the prospects of human-robot interaction also bring semantics into the picture. Driven by need, as well as by enablers like increasing availability of training data and computational resources, semantics is a rapidly growing research area in robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T12:34:39Z)
• Joint Mind Modeling for Explanation Generation in Complex Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks [83.37025218216888]
  We propose a novel explainable AI (XAI) framework for achieving human-like communication in human-robot collaborations. The robot builds a hierarchical mind model of the human user and generates explanations of its own mind as a form of communications. Results show that the generated explanations of our approach significantly improves the collaboration performance and user perception of the robot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T23:35:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.