FoMEMO: Towards Foundation Models for Expensive Multi-objective Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.03244v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 12:00:24 GMT
• Title: FoMEMO: Towards Foundation Models for Expensive Multi-objective Optimization
• Authors: Yiming Yao, Fei Liu, Liang Zhao, Xi Lin, Qingfu Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new paradigm named FoMEMO, which enables the establishment of a foundation model conditioned on any domain trajectory and user preference.<n>Rather than accessing extensive domain experiments in the real world, we demonstrate that pre-training the foundation model with a diverse set of hundreds of millions of synthetic data can lead to superior adaptability to unknown problems.
• Score: 19.69959362934787
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Expensive multi-objective optimization is a prevalent and crucial concern in many real-world scenarios, where sample-efficiency is vital due to the limited evaluations to recover the true Pareto front for decision making. Existing works either involve rebuilding Gaussian process surrogates from scratch for each objective in each new problem encountered, or rely on extensive past domain experiments for pre-training deep learning models, making them hard to generalize and impractical to cope with various emerging applications in the real world. To address this issue, we propose a new paradigm named FoMEMO (Foundation Models for Expensive Multi-objective Optimization), which enables the establishment of a foundation model conditioned on any domain trajectory and user preference, and facilitates fast in-context optimization based on the predicted preference-wise aggregation posteriors. Rather than accessing extensive domain experiments in the real world, we demonstrate that pre-training the foundation model with a diverse set of hundreds of millions of synthetic data can lead to superior adaptability to unknown problems, without necessitating any subsequent model training or updates in the optimization process. We evaluate our method across a variety of synthetic benchmarks and real-word applications, and demonstrate its superior generality and competitive performance compared to existing methods.

Related papers

• TCPO: Thought-Centric Preference Optimization for Effective Embodied Decision-making [75.29820290660065]
  This paper proposes Thought-Centric Preference Optimization ( TCPO) for effective embodied decision-making.<n>It emphasizes the alignment of the model's intermediate reasoning process, mitigating the problem of model degradation.<n>Experiments in the ALFWorld environment demonstrate an average success rate of 26.67%, achieving a 6% improvement over RL4VLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T11:16:21Z)
• Automated Optimization Modeling through Expert-Guided Large Language Model Reasoning [43.63419208391747]
  We present a novel framework that leverages expert-level optimization modeling principles through chain-of-thought reasoning to automate the optimization process.<n>We also introduce LogiOR, a new optimization modeling benchmark from the logistics domain, containing more complex problems with standardized annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T04:14:54Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Objective Multi-Echelon Supply Chain Optimisation [3.1194372040101928]
  The model is evaluated using a multi-objective reinforcement learning (RL) method, benchmarked against an originally single-objective RL algorithm modified with weighted sum.<n>We conduct experiments on varying network complexities, mimicking typical real-world challenges using a customisable simulator.<n>The model determines production and delivery quantities across supply chain routes to achieve near-optimal trade-offs between competing objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T04:30:11Z)
• Divergence Minimization Preference Optimization for Diffusion Model Alignment [58.651951388346525]
  Divergence Minimization Preference Optimization (DMPO) is a principled method for aligning diffusion models by minimizing reverse KL divergence.<n>Our results show that diffusion models fine-tuned with DMPO can consistently outperform or match existing techniques.<n>DMPO unlocks a robust and elegant pathway for preference alignment, bridging principled theory with practical performance in diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:57:30Z)
• Preference-Guided Diffusion for Multi-Objective Offline Optimization [64.08326521234228]
  We propose a preference-guided diffusion model for offline multi-objective optimization.<n>Our guidance is a preference model trained to predict the probability that one design dominates another.<n>Our results highlight the effectiveness of classifier-guided diffusion models in generating diverse and high-quality solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T16:49:38Z)
• A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization [103.59317151002693]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented generative capabilities.<n>Their alignment with human values remains critical for ensuring helpful and harmless deployments.<n>Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently gained prominence as a streamlined alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T08:45:15Z)
• Learning Dynamic Representations via An Optimally-Weighted Maximum Mean Discrepancy Optimization Framework for Continual Learning [16.10753846850319]
  Continual learning allows models to persistently acquire and retain information.<n> catastrophic forgetting can severely impair model performance.<n>We introduce a novel framework termed Optimally-Weighted Mean Discrepancy (OWMMD), which imposes penalties on representation alterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T13:33:45Z)
• Diffusion Models as Constrained Samplers for Optimization with Unknown Constraints [55.39203337683045]
  We propose to perform optimization within the data manifold using diffusion models.<n>Depending on the differentiability of the objective function, we propose two different sampling methods.<n>Our method achieves better or comparable performance with previous state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T03:09:12Z)
• Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment [46.44464839353993]
  We introduce Rewards-in-Context (RiC), which conditions the response of a foundation model on multiple rewards in its prompt context. RiC only requires supervised fine-tuning of a single foundation model and supports dynamic adjustment for user preferences during inference time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T18:58:31Z)
• Slimmable Domain Adaptation [112.19652651687402]
  We introduce a simple framework, Slimmable Domain Adaptation, to improve cross-domain generalization with a weight-sharing model bank. Our framework surpasses other competing approaches by a very large margin on multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T06:28:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.