Benchmarking GPT-5 for biomedical natural language processing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04462v2
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:09:35 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking GPT-5 for biomedical natural language processing
• Authors: Yu Hou, Zaifu Zhan, Min Zeng, Yifan Wu, Shuang Zhou, Rui Zhang,
• Abstract summary: This study extends a unified benchmark to evaluate GPT-5 and GPT-4o across five core biomedical NLP tasks.<n> GPT-5 consistently outperformed GPT-4o, with the largest gains on reasoning-intensive datasets.
• Score: 17.663813433200122
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Biomedical literature and clinical narratives pose multifaceted challenges for natural language understanding, from precise entity extraction and document synthesis to multi-step diagnostic reasoning. This study extends a unified benchmark to evaluate GPT-5 and GPT-4o under zero-, one-, and five-shot prompting across five core biomedical NLP tasks: named entity recognition, relation extraction, multi-label document classification, summarization, and simplification, and nine expanded biomedical QA datasets covering factual knowledge, clinical reasoning, and multimodal visual understanding. Using standardized prompts, fixed decoding parameters, and consistent inference pipelines, we assessed model performance, latency, and token-normalized cost under official pricing. GPT-5 consistently outperformed GPT-4o, with the largest gains on reasoning-intensive datasets such as MedXpertQA and DiagnosisArena and stable improvements in multimodal QA. In core tasks, GPT-5 achieved better chemical NER and ChemProt scores but remained below domain-tuned baselines for disease NER and summarization. Despite producing longer outputs, GPT-5 showed comparable latency and 30 to 50 percent lower effective cost per correct prediction. Fine-grained analyses revealed improvements in diagnosis, treatment, and reasoning subtypes, whereas boundary-sensitive extraction and evidence-dense summarization remain challenging. Overall, GPT-5 approaches deployment-ready performance for biomedical QA while offering a favorable balance of accuracy, interpretability, and economic efficiency. The results support a tiered prompting strategy: direct prompting for large-scale or cost-sensitive applications, and chain-of-thought scaffolds for analytically complex or high-stakes scenarios, highlighting the continued need for hybrid solutions where precision and factual fidelity are critical.

Related papers

• Evaluating GPT-5 as a Multimodal Clinical Reasoner: A Landscape Commentary [36.736436091313585]
  This commentary is the first controlled, cross-sectional evaluation of the GPT-5 family (GPT-5, GPT-5 Mini, GPT-5 Nano) against its predecessor GPT-4o.<n> GPT-5 demonstrated substantial gains in expert-level textual reasoning, with absolute improvements exceeding 25 percentage-points on MedXpertQA.<n>When tasked with multimodal synthesis, GPT-5 effectively leveraged this enhanced reasoning capacity to ground uncertain clinical narratives in concrete imaging evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T03:24:48Z)
• MedAD-R1: Eliciting Consistent Reasoning in Interpretible Medical Anomaly Detection via Consistency-Reinforced Policy Optimization [46.65200216642429]
  We introduce MedAD-38K, the first large-scale, multi-modal, and multi-center benchmark for MedAD featuring diagnostic Chain-of-Thought (CoT) annotations alongside structured Visual Question-Answering (VQA) pairs.<n>Our proposed model, MedAD-R1, achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the MedAD-38K benchmark, outperforming strong baselines by more than 10%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T07:56:10Z)
• From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical Calculations [45.414878840652115]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising performance on medical benchmarks.<n>However, their ability to perform medical calculations remains underexplored and poorly evaluated.<n>In this work, we revisit medical calculation evaluation with a stronger focus on clinical trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T09:10:26Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models for Evidence-Based Clinical Question Answering [4.101088122511548]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial progress in biomedical and clinical applications.<n>We curate a benchmark drawing from Cochrane systematic reviews and clinical guidelines.<n>We observe consistent performance patterns across sources and clinical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-13T15:03:34Z)
• Capabilities of GPT-5 across critical domains: Is it the next breakthrough? [0.0]
  GPT-4 by OpenAI introduced advances in reasoning, multimodality, and task generalization.<n>Released in August 2025, GPT-5 incorporates a system-of-models architecture designed for task-specific optimization.<n>This study provides one of the first systematic comparisons of GPT-4 and GPT-5 using human raters from linguistics and clinical fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T12:26:11Z)
• Benchmarking GPT-5 for Zero-Shot Multimodal Medical Reasoning in Radiology and Radiation Oncology [4.156123728258067]
  We present a zero-shot evaluation of GPT-5 and its smaller variants (GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano) against GPT-4o across three representative tasks.<n>Across all datasets, GPT-5 achieved the highest accuracy, with substantial gains over GPT-4o up to +200% in challenging anatomical regions.<n>GPT-5 delivers consistent and often pronounced performance improvements over GPT-4o in both image-grounded reasoning and domain-specific numerical problem-solving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T16:14:51Z)
• Performance of GPT-5 Frontier Models in Ophthalmology Question Answering [6.225411871775591]
  Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-5 integrate advanced reasoning capabilities that may improve performance on medical question-answering tasks.<n>We evaluated 12 configurations of OpenAI's GPT-5 series alongside o1-high, o3-high, and GPT-4o.<n> GPT-5-high ranked first in both accuracy (1.66x stronger than o3-high) and rationale quality (1.11x stronger than o3-high)<n>These results benchmark GPT-5 on a high-quality ophthalmology dataset, demonstrate the influence of reasoning effort on accuracy, and introduce an autograder framework for scalable evaluation of
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T17:17:17Z)
• Capabilities of GPT-5 on Multimodal Medical Reasoning [4.403894457826502]
  This study positions GPT-5 as a generalist multimodal reasoner for medical decision support.<n>We benchmark GPT-5, GPT-5-mini, GPT-5-nano, and GPT-4o-2024-11-20 against standardized splits of MedQA, MedXpertQA (text and multimodal), MMLU medical subsets, USMLE self-assessment exams, and VQA-RAD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T17:43:45Z)
• Medical Reasoning in the Era of LLMs: A Systematic Review of Enhancement Techniques and Applications [59.721265428780946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) in medicine have enabled impressive capabilities, yet a critical gap remains in their ability to perform systematic, transparent, and verifiable reasoning.<n>This paper provides the first systematic review of this emerging field.<n>We propose a taxonomy of reasoning enhancement techniques, categorized into training-time strategies and test-time mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T14:41:31Z)
• Quantifying the Reasoning Abilities of LLMs on Real-world Clinical Cases [48.87360916431396]
  We introduce MedR-Bench, a benchmarking dataset of 1,453 structured patient cases, annotated with reasoning references.<n>We propose a framework encompassing three critical examination recommendation, diagnostic decision-making, and treatment planning, simulating the entire patient care journey.<n>Using this benchmark, we evaluate five state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, including DeepSeek-R1, OpenAI-o3-mini, and Gemini-2.0-Flash Thinking, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T18:35:39Z)
• RankRAG: Unifying Context Ranking with Retrieval-Augmented Generation in LLMs [60.38044044203333]
  Large language models (LLMs) typically utilize the top-k contexts from a retriever in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) We propose a novel instruction fine-tuning framework RankRAG, which instruction-tunes a single LLM for the dual purpose of context ranking and answer generation in RAG. For generation, we compare our model with many strong baselines, including GPT-4-0613, GPT-4-turbo-2024-0409, and ChatQA-1.5, an open-sourced model with the state-of-the-art performance on RAG benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T17:59:17Z)
• BMRetriever: Tuning Large Language Models as Better Biomedical Text Retrievers [48.21255861863282]
  BMRetriever is a series of dense retrievers for enhancing biomedical retrieval. BMRetriever exhibits strong parameter efficiency, with the 410M variant outperforming baselines up to 11.7 times larger.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T05:40:08Z)
• Exploring the Boundaries of GPT-4 in Radiology [46.30976153809968]
  GPT-4 has a sufficient level of radiology knowledge with only occasional errors in complex context. For findings summarisation, GPT-4 outputs are found to be overall comparable with existing manually-written impressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T05:13:03Z)
• Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
  "Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions. We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z)
• GPT-4 Technical Report [116.90398195245983]
  GPT-4 is a large-scale, multimodal model which can accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs. It exhibits human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, including passing a simulated bar exam with a score around the top 10% of test takers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T17:15:04Z)
• News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3 [73.48220043216087]
  We study how GPT-3 compares against fine-tuned models trained on large summarization datasets. We show that not only do humans overwhelmingly prefer GPT-3 summaries, prompted using only a task description, but these also do not suffer from common dataset-specific issues such as poor factuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T01:04:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.