Artificially Fluent: Swahili AI Performance Benchmarks Between English-Trained and Natively-Trained Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04516v2
• Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 20:25:45 GMT
• Title: Artificially Fluent: Swahili AI Performance Benchmarks Between English-Trained and Natively-Trained Datasets
• Authors: Sophie Jaffer, Simeon Sayer,
• Abstract summary: This study compares two monolingual BERT models: one trained and tested entirely on Swahili data, and another on comparable English news data.<n>This approach tests the hypothesis by evaluating whether translating Swahili inputs for evaluation on an English model yields better or worse performance compared to training and testing a model entirely in Swahili.<n>The results prove that, despite high-quality translation, the native Swahili-trained model performed better than the Swahili-to-English translated model, producing nearly four times fewer errors: 0.36% vs. 1.47% respectively.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) expand multilingual capabilities, questions remain about the equity of their performance across languages. While many communities stand to benefit from AI systems, the dominance of English in training data risks disadvantaging non-English speakers. To test the hypothesis that such data disparities may affect model performance, this study compares two monolingual BERT models: one trained and tested entirely on Swahili data, and another on comparable English news data. To simulate how multilingual LLMs process non-English queries through internal translation and abstraction, we translated the Swahili news data into English and evaluated it using the English-trained model. This approach tests the hypothesis by evaluating whether translating Swahili inputs for evaluation on an English model yields better or worse performance compared to training and testing a model entirely in Swahili, thus isolating the effect of language consistency versus cross-lingual abstraction. The results prove that, despite high-quality translation, the native Swahili-trained model performed better than the Swahili-to-English translated model, producing nearly four times fewer errors: 0.36% vs. 1.47% respectively. This gap suggests that translation alone does not bridge representational differences between languages and that models trained in one language may struggle to accurately interpret translated inputs due to imperfect internal knowledge representation, suggesting that native-language training remains important for reliable outcomes. In educational and informational contexts, even small performance gaps may compound inequality. Future research should focus on addressing broader dataset development for underrepresented languages and renewed attention to multilingual model evaluation, ensuring the reinforcing effect of global AI deployment on existing digital divides is reduced.

Related papers

• Exploring Performance Variations in Finetuned Translators of Ultra-Low Resource Languages: Do Linguistic Differences Matter? [0.0]
  Finetuning pre-trained language models with small amounts of data is a commonly-used method to create translators for ultra-low resource languages.<n>Previous works have reported substantially different performances with translators created using similar methodology and data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T14:15:14Z)
• Adapting Language Models to Indonesian Local Languages: An Empirical Study of Language Transferability on Zero-Shot Settings [1.1556013985948772]
  We evaluate transferability of pre-trained language models to low-resource Indonesian local languages.<n>We group the target languages into three categories: seen, partially seen, and unseen.<n> Multilingual models perform best on seen languages, moderately on partially seen ones, and poorly on unseen languages.<n>We find that MAD-X significantly improves performance, especially for seen and partially seen languages, without requiring labeled data in the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T12:17:55Z)
• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• A Comparative Study of Translation Bias and Accuracy in Multilingual Large Language Models for Cross-Language Claim Verification [1.566834021297545]
  This study systematically evaluates translation bias and the effectiveness of Large Language Models for cross-lingual claim verification. We investigate two distinct translation methods: pre-translation and self-translation. Our findings reveal that low-resource languages exhibit significantly lower accuracy in direct inference due to underrepresentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T09:02:42Z)
• The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
  We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance. Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes. We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z)
• Zero-shot Cross-lingual Stance Detection via Adversarial Language Adaptation [7.242609314791262]
  This paper introduces a novel approach to zero-shot cross-lingual stance detection, Multilingual Translation-Augmented BERT (MTAB) Our technique employs translation augmentation to improve zero-shot performance and pairs it with adversarial learning to further boost model efficacy. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach, showcasing improved results in comparison to a strong baseline model as well as ablated versions of our model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T16:56:43Z)
• mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation [79.60172087719356]
  Abstractive summarization has enjoyed renewed interest in recent years, thanks to pre-trained language models and the availability of large-scale datasets. Despite promising results, current models still suffer from generating factually inconsistent summaries. We leverage factual consistency evaluation models to improve multilingual summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T19:52:41Z)
• Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for Check-worthy Claim Identification over Twitter [7.601937548486356]
  Misinformation spread over social media has become an undeniable infodemic. We present a systematic study of six approaches for cross-lingual check-worthiness estimation across pairs of five diverse languages with the help of Multilingual BERT (mBERT) model. Our results show that for some language pairs, zero-shot cross-lingual transfer is possible and can perform as good as monolingual models that are trained on the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T18:18:53Z)
• Language Contamination Explains the Cross-lingual Capabilities of English Pretrained Models [79.38278330678965]
  We find that common English pretraining corpora contain significant amounts of non-English text. This leads to hundreds of millions of foreign language tokens in large-scale datasets. We then demonstrate that even these small percentages of non-English data facilitate cross-lingual transfer for models trained on them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T23:56:54Z)
• On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translation [81.81456880770762]
  Language coverage bias is important for neural machine translation (NMT) because the target-original training data is not well exploited in current practice. By carefully designing experiments, we provide comprehensive analyses of the language coverage bias in the training data. We propose two simple and effective approaches to alleviate the language coverage bias problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T01:55:34Z)
• A Hybrid Approach for Improved Low Resource Neural Machine Translation using Monolingual Data [0.0]
  Many language pairs are low resource, meaning the amount and/or quality of available parallel data is not sufficient to train a neural machine translation (NMT) model. This work proposes a novel approach that enables both the backward and forward models to benefit from the monolingual target data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-14T22:18:45Z)
• Mixed-Lingual Pre-training for Cross-lingual Summarization [54.4823498438831]
  Cross-lingual Summarization aims at producing a summary in the target language for an article in the source language. We propose a solution based on mixed-lingual pre-training that leverages both cross-lingual tasks like translation and monolingual tasks like masked language models. Our model achieves an improvement of 2.82 (English to Chinese) and 1.15 (Chinese to English) ROUGE-1 scores over state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-18T00:21:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.