Towards Personalized Explanations for Health Simulations: A Mixed-Methods Framework for Stakeholder-Centric Summarization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04646v1
• Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 20:07:31 GMT
• Title: Towards Personalized Explanations for Health Simulations: A Mixed-Methods Framework for Stakeholder-Centric Summarization
• Authors: Philippe J. Giabbanelli, Ameeta Agrawal,
• Abstract summary: We present a step-by-step framework to identify stakeholder needs and guide LLMs in generating tailored explanations of health simulations.<n>Our procedure uses a mixed-methods design by first eliciting the explanation needs and stylistic preferences of diverse health stakeholders.
• Score: 3.52359746858894
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Modeling & Simulation (M&S) approaches such as agent-based models hold significant potential to support decision-making activities in health, with recent examples including the adoption of vaccines, and a vast literature on healthy eating behaviors and physical activity behaviors. These models are potentially usable by different stakeholder groups, as they support policy-makers to estimate the consequences of potential interventions and they can guide individuals in making healthy choices in complex environments. However, this potential may not be fully realized because of the models' complexity, which makes them inaccessible to the stakeholders who could benefit the most. While Large Language Models (LLMs) can translate simulation outputs and the design of models into text, current approaches typically rely on one-size-fits-all summaries that fail to reflect the varied informational needs and stylistic preferences of clinicians, policymakers, patients, caregivers, and health advocates. This limitation stems from a fundamental gap: we lack a systematic understanding of what these stakeholders need from explanations and how to tailor them accordingly. To address this gap, we present a step-by-step framework to identify stakeholder needs and guide LLMs in generating tailored explanations of health simulations. Our procedure uses a mixed-methods design by first eliciting the explanation needs and stylistic preferences of diverse health stakeholders, then optimizing the ability of LLMs to generate tailored outputs (e.g., via controllable attribute tuning), and then evaluating through a comprehensive range of metrics to further improve the tailored generation of summaries.

Related papers

• Sample Size Calculations for Developing Clinical Prediction Models: Overview and pmsims R package [0.45393070061887714]
  Inadequate sample sizes can lead to overfitting, poor generalisability, and biased predictions.<n>Existing approaches, such as rules, closed-form formulas, and simulation-based methods, vary in flexibility and accuracy.<n>We introduce a conceptual framework that distinguishes between mean-based and assurance-based criteria.<n>We propose a novel simulation-based approach that integrates learning curves, Gaussian Process optimisation, and assurance principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T21:24:34Z)
• MedSAM-Agent: Empowering Interactive Medical Image Segmentation with Multi-turn Agentic Reinforcement Learning [53.37068897861388]
  MedSAM-Agent is a framework that reformulates interactive segmentation as a multi-step autonomous decision-making process.<n>We develop a two-stage training pipeline that integrates multi-turn, end-to-end outcome verification.<n>Experiments across 6 medical modalities and 21 datasets demonstrate that MedSAM-Agent achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T09:47:49Z)
• Integrating Genomics into Multimodal EHR Foundation Models [56.31910745104141]
  This paper introduces an innovative EHR foundation model that integrates Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) as a foundational data modality.<n>The framework aims to learn complex relationships between clinical data and genetic predispositions.<n>This approach is pivotal for unlocking new insights into disease prediction, proactive health management, risk stratification, and personalized treatment strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T15:56:40Z)
• Beyond Correlation: Towards Causal Large Language Model Agents in Biomedicine [0.14700417433722487]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in biomedicine but lack true causal understanding, relying instead on correlations.<n>This paper envisions causal LLM agents that integrate multimodal data (text, images, genomics, etc.) and perform intervention-based reasoning to infer cause-and-effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T17:52:59Z)
• Enhancing Patient-Centric Communication: Leveraging LLMs to Simulate Patient Perspectives [19.462374723301792]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in role-playing scenarios.<n>By mimicking human behavior, LLMs can anticipate responses based on concrete demographic or professional profiles.<n>We evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in simulating individuals with diverse backgrounds and analyze the consistency of these simulated behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T22:49:32Z)
• Self-Healing Machine Learning: A Framework for Autonomous Adaptation in Real-World Environments [50.310636905746975]
  Real-world machine learning systems often encounter model performance degradation due to distributional shifts in the underlying data generating process. Existing approaches to addressing shifts, such as concept drift adaptation, are limited by their reason-agnostic nature. We propose self-healing machine learning (SHML) to overcome these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T20:05:51Z)
• On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
  Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks. We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly. In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z)
• Explainable Biomedical Hypothesis Generation via Retrieval Augmented Generation enabled Large Language Models [46.05020842978823]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools to navigate this complex data landscape. RAGGED is a comprehensive workflow designed to support investigators with knowledge integration and hypothesis generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T07:44:18Z)
• Graph-Augmented LLMs for Personalized Health Insights: A Case Study in Sleep Analysis [2.303486126296845]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in delivering interactive health advice. Traditional methods like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and fine-tuning often fail to fully utilize the complex, multi-dimensional, and temporally relevant data. This paper introduces a graph-augmented LLM framework designed to significantly enhance the personalization and clarity of health insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T01:22:54Z)
• A Toolbox for Surfacing Health Equity Harms and Biases in Large Language Models [20.11590976578911]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold promise to serve complex health information needs but also have the potential to introduce harm and exacerbate health disparities. Reliably evaluating equity-related model failures is a critical step toward developing systems that promote health equity. We present resources and methodologies for surfacing biases with potential to precipitate equity-related harms in long-form, LLM-generated answers to medical questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:56:37Z)
• Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
  Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem. Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools. We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z)
• Extending Process Discovery with Model Complexity Optimization and Cyclic States Identification: Application to Healthcare Processes [62.997667081978825]
  The paper presents an approach to process mining providing semi-automatic support to model optimization. A model simplification approach is proposed, which essentially abstracts the raw model at the desired granularity. We aim to demonstrate the capabilities of the technological solution using three datasets from different applications in the healthcare domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T16:20:59Z)
• A Twin Neural Model for Uplift [59.38563723706796]
  Uplift is a particular case of conditional treatment effect modeling. We propose a new loss function defined by leveraging a connection with the Bayesian interpretation of the relative risk. We show our proposed method is competitive with the state-of-the-art in simulation setting and on real data from large scale randomized experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-11T16:02:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.